Jump to content

User talk:Magioladitis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Magioladitis/Archive 19) (bot
→‎Thanks: new section
Line 317: Line 317:
[[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 05:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Coolabahapple|Coolabahapple]] ([[User talk:Coolabahapple|talk]]) 05:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>
<br style="clear: both;"/>

== Thanks ==

I just wanted to take a minute and say thanks for the help on those edits and for the hard work on the improvements to AWB. Its good to know that some folks are still working to improve the project. I also wanted to let you know that I just loaded the new optional update. I'm not sure if its an issue with Wikia today, but since I did the update it trips the timer every few edits. It could just be something with Wikia, but I wanted to let you know anyway just in case. Special K.:-) [[Special:Contributions/108.28.162.100|108.28.162.100]] ([[User talk:108.28.162.100|talk]]) 01:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:09, 5 January 2015

Yobot request

Hi. Is this request good to go? Let me know if there are any problems. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts Hi! I can do during this week. I 've been busy doing other stuff. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thank you. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:16, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Magioladitis. Do you have an update of when this will be started? Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:51, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lugnuts tonight! -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tonight, Tonight? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 20:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lugnuts thanks for the ping. I totally forgot about it. I started it right now. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Initial request

At the Film Project three new task forces have been created. Please could a bot tag the {{WikiProject Film}} banner of articles in the following categories with the appropriate tags:

If an article currently doesn't have a talkpage or a film project tag on an existing talkpage, to add that too. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to myself: I started creating User:Yobot/Film. -- Magioladitis (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts Something is wrong. I think not all sub-cats of Category:Documentary films are films. 44,000 items! -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How many sub-levels of categories does your tagging go down? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lugnuts all the way down unless you tell me otherwise. I haven't started any real tagging yet on this part so no harm has done so far. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:16, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, interesting! I suspect there's a rogue parent category somewhere in the category tree. What if you only tag all the articles in the cats and sub-cats of Category:Documentary films by country and Category:Documentary films by decade? In theory, that should be all of them. Shawn in Montreal - I know you've done a lot of work on the documentary categories - can you spot anything odd with the sub-cats? Thanks! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure. I know Ford has pointed out that we've got some TV doc series mixed in, but it's not that big a problem, I didn't think. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:38, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great on all the articles and cats I have a watch on. And I'm pleased to see that it's tagging documentary filmmakers, too. If that's the case, then it should eventually tag the documentary film organizations, festivals, awards, too, I expect. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, me again. I see it's not adding the documentary tag to categories of doc films by topic, only film? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shawn in Montreal I did not start yet. I normalised the templates before the real tagging to simplify any complications. I'll start tonight. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes of course. I just saw that forest of bold on my watch page and assumed. Thanks. I'm looking forward to seeing if and how all this work leads to an improvement in the doc film articles, down the road. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts subcats of silent films gives 19,000 pages. Subcats of Mexican have a "normal" amount of pages. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about the subcats of just Category:Silent films by country ? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Refined categories

Lugnuts these are the stats:

-- Magioladitis (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts I can proceed if you think this is OK. I checked the category tree of these last 4 categories and seems fine. Meanwhile, I am doing some normalisation to help my tagging code. Things are complicated with all these variants of banners and parameters. I can write a better code later tonight. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good to me - many thanks for looking at this. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I finished the normalisation part. I'll now check which banners already have the wanted parameters and this will reduce the lists more. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note to myself: Exclude biographies from tagging. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If I may: but doc film festivals, awards, etc. They won't necessarily be excluded? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shawn in Montreal no idea. I excluded biographies per a comment that WP:FILM excludes biographies. Is anything else I have to do? I am not a member of WPFilm. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts and Shawn in Montreal: do you want to discuss so I get specific instructions of what to do? Right now I am adding parameters to only existing templates. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts I finished the Mexican ones by adding the parameter only the existing templates. 550 pages affected. I ll continue tomorrow. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm sorry, I don't think I can give you any definitive advice. I believe doc filmmaking organizations, awards, etc. should be included. But the Film wikiproject has separate projects for Filmmaking as it does Filmmakers, and Lugnuts or others may feel the Doc films group should only properly include doc films-related articles, categories, etc. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:14, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They would come in scope for the project and tagging them with the documentary banner sounds reasonable to me. I can't imagine anyone would take offense at the tag being added! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
But to be clear: it's the documentary films banner. I believe Fortdj33 has already corrected me on this, and objected to my proposal that the banner also be applied to documentaries TV series and interactive webdocs. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Magioladitis - what's the latest with the bot tagging? Everything seems to have stopped since 2 days ago. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 10:16, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lugnuts I loaded the next list but unfortunately I'll be busy for the next day. I am traveling for a Wikimedia meeting. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - have fun! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 12:20, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts I finished the Silent ones by adding the parameter only the existing templates. Approx. 7,000 affected. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my watchlist is collapsing under its own weight! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts I started the first part of the Documentary ones. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts Task finished for all pages that already had WikiProject Film on them. Tell me if there is something else I have to do i.e. add banners to pages that do not have it (but I would need specifics of which pages to exclude). -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn in Montreal yes as soon as we find the rogue category that increases the number of articles to 40,000 and sends my bot outside the film pages frame. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't realize that was still an issue. I've eyeballed the cats and I don't see it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn in Montreal Category:Documentary films by genre‎ it's not clear. It even contains user pages. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Take Documentary films by genre → Category:Mockumentaries for instance. It goes to TV series. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as as someone who's perhaps worked the most in the non-fiction film area, I personally don't believe that mockumentaries should be tagged at all. They're fiction films that mimic the documentary style. They're more akin to a comedic version of Found footage (genre) than true documentary. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Shawn in Montreal OK but as you see we have to make exceptions or reconstruct the category tree. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My personal preference would be to make an exception, leave this one aside at least for now, and move on to other untagged category branches. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn in Montreal still too risky. I still haven't found where the user space articles come from. And there are more issues to solve. I can move slowly forward but it's a bit time consuming to be honest. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn in Montreal The problem was with Mockumentaries since it contains Category:The Office (U.S. TV series) which contains Category:The Office task force articles which most probably it should not. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Documentary films by topic

Shawn in Montreal, Lugnuts the last category is Category:Documentary films by topic. There is something wrong there too. Somehow is leads me to Category:Prisoner of war camps in the United States, Category:Military personnel killed in the Falklands War and Category:Operatives of the Dirty War. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are 40 subcategories of Category:Documentary films by topic.

-- Magioladitis (talk) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Should Category:Rock video albums be subcategory of Category:Documentary films about the arts‎?

Shawn in Montreal, Lugnuts Category:United States submarine stubs is in the category tree of Category:Documentary films about death‎. -- 13:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Looks good. I guess most of them will already be covered by the categories for years and countries. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:48, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn in Montreal, Lugnuts I did my part. I will do some tagging but I would like you to check the category tree in the 2 problematic categories. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you just exclude the articles in Category:Rock video albums? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 15:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) The subcategory of Category:Documentary films about death‎ called Category:Filmed deaths seems to be the problem. GoingBatty (talk) 15:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ha. Well, I have removed Category:Filmed deaths as a subcategory with an explanation in the edit summary as to why: we'll see if that edit sticks. They will still share the Category:Films about death parent category, which should suffice. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Missing documentary films by topic tags

As much as the work by Magioladitis is appreciated, there's no way that he is going to catch everything that needs to be tagged. Once the bulk of relevant articles have been tagged by the bot, it will be up to the members of those projects to verify that all the articles are tagged properly, and to catch any that might have been missed. I'm just trying to do my part... Fortdj33 (talk) 17:43, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As am I. I do not have access to AWB but have already done some clean up based on what I've found in the main Task force article listing. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:54, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know why the bot did not revisit this page (and I guess much more). At some point I excluded many pages that were related to broken category tree. I am trying my best here but I certainly need help. I do not want to end up tagging thousands of unrelated pages. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magioladitis! Would it be possible for you to please tweak Yobot's skip criteria so that it doesn't make edits when it's only doing template redirects, like this edit and this edit? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GoingBatty thanks for the help, the comments and the feedback you provide. Right now I run two custom modules separately. I could merge them but this would make my life a bit more difficult. Right now I am in a Wikimedia Meeting. I can try to modify the code tomorrow. Thanks again. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the hard work in tagging these articles over the past few days. I think the vast majority have now been tagged. Have a great Christmas! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts merry Christmas to you too! -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda films and the doc tag

Resolved

Okay, here's another little problem: I was surprised to see "Pimpernel" Smith tagged as a documentary article. It's a propaganda film, but it's fiction, rather than a doc film. I know from the National Film Board of Canada's work that most Canadian WWII propaganda films would qualify as documentary films, but that may vary from country to country? I think it's best just to remove the tags manually where they don't apply.... Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:41, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Shawn in Montreal: This articles is in Category:British World War II propaganda films, which is a sub-subcategory of Category:Documentary films about World War II. GoingBatty (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I'm not suggesting it be decategorized since I expect most wartime propaganda films will fall under the non-fiction film category. I'll just remove the doc tag from articles where it's not a doc film, and I expect others will, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bot finished tagging. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of talk page redirects

Greetings. User:AnomieBOT is approved to create talk pages of subtemplates redirects to the template's talk page. You are coming round afterwards and deleting them. Why? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MSGJ do you have an example? Maybe it was a mistake? What is a subtemplate? -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Template talk:WikiProject writing systems/doc — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AWB bugs

Hi. I use default settings. I don't know how duplicate this bug on demand. I updated to version 5.5.5.0 and I reported here the bug? I don't know if this is important but sincerely I don't make any edit with AWB, I make only dummy edits. I will not explain to you why because is a long history. Bye. --The Polish (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Magioladitis, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing,
(t) Josve05a (c) 17:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Merry

To you and yours

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk thank you very much! I wish you too. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:16, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Defaultsort

Resolved

Is it necessary to add defaultsort into railway station articles?[1] Thanks OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OccultZone yes. In order to delist it from the list of pages with special characters in sortkey. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Including those titles that have got no special characters? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OccultZone in the example your provided there is a special character (á). Do you have an example with no special characters? -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are a few, like Vista Alegre (Madrid Metro) has no special character in the title. No defaultsort in the article. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OccultZone No need to add anything there then. -- Magioladitis (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas, Magio! Wishing you the best in your life. --Meno25 (talk) 06:54, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Meno25 Many greetings to you my friend too! -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

#property usage on cebu / bohol pages

As you may have seen, I'm working my way through the cities and municipalities, changing statements where possible to use wikidata. It is not the easiest job, because wikidata seems to have been designed without any external reference, i.e. what the customer wants rather than what the provider feels like giving. In particular, it is very unsuited to places rather than people. There is no notion as far as I can see of any dimension, not area, no length / elevation etc.

So a lot of items have to be got in with a wangle. This is particularly so when wishing, as I do, to introduce a general case rather than a specific, while at the same time endeavouring to have the output look more or less like it was before. So for example motto is usually presented as italics, even though the infobox itself doesn't do it. But infobox does present something if there is anything given, so a value such as {{#if:{{#property:P1451}}|''{{#property:P1451}}''}} with no actual instantiation of motto-text will produce a line something like Motto: '

Similarly, if {{URL}} is invoked without a parameter, it will give some kind of error case.

There are other problems associated with items which can take multiple values, for instance inception – there are many cases where a city / municipality has more than one. It may have a founding year some centuries ago, and an establishment (or incorporation) date later. Wikidata is not able to supply the values separately, but returns a csv list, where I replace each comma with <br /> (and hope they tie up with the title values alongside, which are not held in wikidata!).

There are many other items I would like to see brought into wikidata, for instance i "income classification" which is part of the legal definition of the city / municipality; ii PSGC (Philippines Standard Geographical Code), which is also part of the location official details. Et cetera.

Believe me, everything I am including is there for a reason, not for fun.

Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Thu 18:26, wikitime= 10:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unbuttered Parsnip I do not recall consensus to add wikidata items like this in English Wikipedia to be honest. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand. What is wikidata for, if not a collection of data? Where would there be a consensus, or even discussion?—Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Thu 23:10, wikitime= 15:10, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgwhite, GoingBatty, and Frietjes: for advice on this. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:56, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure on the status of Wikidata. I do remember these types of edits were reverted as no consensus, but that was a long time ago... over a year ago.
My main concern is doing it so somebody who is a semi-newbie can understand. Having infoboxes contain #if and other programming statements are not easy to understand. Having span tags to go around a colon is overkill. There has to be a better way.
For the immediate now:
  1. You don't need an #if statement for a website. See Sibonga, Cebu, it works just fine.
  2. For {{zwj}}<span style="padding-left:2px; padding-right:2px;">:</span>{{zwj}}, per this edit, I think this is overkill. "IDD:area code" is certainly is not the longest label. Odds of this being split (reason for {{zwj}}) are extremely low. I don't see a reason to make this so complicated.
For the infobox and wikidata
  1. There are infoboxes that will retrieve info from Wikidata if values are available. {{Infobox South African municipality}} is an example. {{Infobox person/Wikidata}} is another. Work on Module:Wikidata looks to be progressing and this module would be used in other infoboxes for Wikidata retrieval.
  2. If there is a way for the Infobox to fill in the data "automatically", it would be a much better and easier solution in the long run. Much faster than what Parsnip is doing now and much easier for a newbie. RexxS works on the Module and the person/Wikidata infobox. Hopefully Rexx can give us an updated.
Bgwhite (talk) 08:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{infobox settlement}} This template is used on 428,000+ pages. As regards a standard, why there at least 425,000 different standards, all of them jumbled bosh. I don't understand what algorithm the template uses to decide the widths of the columns (or why) - my guess it does something with the unrendered texts, which could be any size. I'm sure I had a reason for setting the phone codes as I did, such as their wrapping in the wrong place. But I've just come across {{thinsp}} which does most of it elegantly.
As I said, while it may work for specific cases, the whole point is not having to know, not having to tailor it. That's what standardised means. That's what KISS means too.
Undoubtedly using wikidata direct would be an answer, but at the moment it doesn't do it, and contrary to what you say (BG) I think it will be a long time coming. Even basic functions are missing, such as extracting qualifiers one by one. It looks like a usable form of coordinates may be some time coming too.
One of the reasons for the "if" was to slant the font. ''<nothing>'' causes something like ' to show, so it was necessary to test the value. Maybe I can use old-fashioned <i>nothing</i> instead.
I'm working within the confines of what is available now. Not waiting for jam tomorrow.
I continue puzzled about wikidata itself. Comments here seem to be blowing hot and cold.
Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Fri 22:30, wikitime= 14:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Unbuttered Parsnip I guess we should wait so that templates automatically obtain data from Wikidata and not force items into them. An example is {{Official website}}. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:03, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That may not be the best example - (a) it's not supposed to be used in infoboxes; (b) it gives wrong display with a blank parameter. 203.184.139.1 (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{Official website}} is a good example because it shows wikidata in action. Wrong display is something that can be fixed.
Unfortunately, waiting is probably the best option. It isn't hurting anything not to use Wikidata now. It only complicates things now. It only complicates things when switched over to Wikidata. Module:Wikidata seems like the first step in converting infoboxes and it is being worked on. I fear the usual response when something new is introduced on Wikipedia.... A cry of no, petitions to have it removed, etc. I do hope things happen sooner. Bgwhite (talk) 08:56, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Unbuttered Parsnip: My two cents: Since you continue to be "puzzled about Wikidata itself", I suggest you start conversations at the template talk pages and/or Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) to work with other editors on the best way to integrate Wikidata into Wikipedia articles. I hope it can be incorporated into the infobox template code instead of requiring editors to put non-intuitive codes as parameter values. Good luck! GoingBatty (talk) 00:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matthias Laurenz Gräff

Resolved

I ve linked the article three times, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Matthias_Laurenz_Gr%C3%A4ff so I think it isnt an orphan anymore. Can I clean the following link? {{Orphan|date=December 2014}} Kind regards --Artium72 (talk) 12:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Artium72 Done. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, happy new year! --Artium72 (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AWB and text search

Resolved

It seems that text search is back in AWB 5.5.6.0. Thank you and your colleagues for latest update. Merry Christmas and happy New year.--Ma▀▄Ga 13:35, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MaGa Merry Christmas and happy New year to you too! Thanks for the feedback and the patience. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, keep up good work with AWB.--Ma▀▄Ga 14:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Dear Magioladitis,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Chechens

On this page and some others, I had to remove the changes that were made by a banned user (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beh-nam/Archive 94.210.203.230). You can do your AWB fixes again if you want to. Oh and Happy New Year! Bladesmulti (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

hi your yobot fixed a silly mistake i made tks:)

Coolabahapple (talk) 05:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I just wanted to take a minute and say thanks for the help on those edits and for the hard work on the improvements to AWB. Its good to know that some folks are still working to improve the project. I also wanted to let you know that I just loaded the new optional update. I'm not sure if its an issue with Wikia today, but since I did the update it trips the timer every few edits. It could just be something with Wikia, but I wanted to let you know anyway just in case. Special K.:-) 108.28.162.100 (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Magioladitis&oldid=641020767"