Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Rjd0060 (talk | contribs)
33,499 edits
→‎Center City West, Philadelphia: declined - not enough recent activity
Rjd0060 (talk | contribs)
33,499 edits
Line 28: Line 28:
* {{pagelinks|FAZE2016MEMBERS}}
* {{pagelinks|FAZE2016MEMBERS}}
'''[[WP:SALT|Creation protection]]:''' Page created three times in the space of a day. User may not be reading talk page messages. A short protection (I'd recommend 72 hours) should prevent the user from attempting to create the page again. As the title is not relevant to any potential article, a permanent protection could also be used. [[User:Adi sco 93|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:Adi sco 93|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Adi sco 93|contribs]]</sup> 15:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
'''[[WP:SALT|Creation protection]]:''' Page created three times in the space of a day. User may not be reading talk page messages. A short protection (I'd recommend 72 hours) should prevent the user from attempting to create the page again. As the title is not relevant to any potential article, a permanent protection could also be used. [[User:Adi sco 93|Adam]] <sup>[[User talk:Adi sco 93|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Adi sco 93|contribs]]</sup> 15:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|d}}, The creator ([[User:FaZeClan2013|FaZeClan2013]]) has since been indef. blocked. If they evade and re-create the page, we'll be happy to block them. [[User:Rjd0060|Rjd0060]] ([[User talk:Rjd0060|talk]]) 05:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)


=== [[:List of Blue's Clues episodes]] ===
=== [[:List of Blue's Clues episodes]] ===

Revision as of 05:07, 10 January 2016


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Four the Record

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently there is PC, however when I went to review some of the new edits I noticed that there is an excessive amount of users reverting IPs and non-autoconfirmed users. I think that simply semi-protection will be better. Dat GuyTalkContribs 13:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (PC also removed) Rjd0060 (talk) 05:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Alireza JJ

    Temporary protection: Persistent addition of non-English content Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Center City West, Philadelphia

    Semi-protection: Extensive inappropriate IP edits. I started a discussion on the talk page but there has been no response and the IP edits continue. TypoBoy (talk) 14:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    List of countries by English-speaking population

    Semi-protection: Constant uncited additions and changes Serendipodous 14:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    FAZE2016MEMBERS

    Creation protection: Page created three times in the space of a day. User may not be reading talk page messages. A short protection (I'd recommend 72 hours) should prevent the user from attempting to create the page again. As the title is not relevant to any potential article, a permanent protection could also be used. Adam talk - contribs 15:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, The creator (FaZeClan2013) has since been indef. blocked. If they evade and re-create the page, we'll be happy to block them. Rjd0060 (talk) 05:07, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Blue's Clues episodes

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same pattern as before. DanielRigal (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Adi sco 93, can't you just write "already protected" after the note? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought I'd mention when the page was protected, since the bot picked it up. I'll just put "already protected" if I notice any others. Adam talk - contribs 22:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Football records in Spain

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several fan based vandals are engaged in edit war. Please protect. SupernovaeIA (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Christian POV on Wikipedia

    Indefinite semi-protection: Page was semi-protected for three days, but the disruptive editing from IPs resumed soon after the protection ended. StAnselm (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Second this request. The dynamic IP keeps coming back, won't discuss on talk, and won't accept compromise. ~Awilley (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    2015–16 La Liga

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content and vandalism. Qed237 (talk) 21:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Protection: Chef (film)

    A user who joined today has reverted this page in excess of 3 times to keep information about some Youtube video and a photograph of the apparent creator of the Youtube content on the page. 3 editors, including myself, have sought to revert the unconstructive user's edits with the editor each time reverting the edits.Stereorock (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Attempting to recorrect standard requesting of RFPP. He possibly means either semi-protection or full-protection. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 22:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Brian Hoyer

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CrashUnderride 22:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Songs category

    Indefinite semi protection: Highly visible template – 2951 transclusions. Armbrust The Homunculus 22:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Marriage Boot Camp

    Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and unsourced edits within past 24 hours despite repeated warnings. -- Whats new?(talk) 23:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Cairo League

    Semi-protection: Persistent sock/meatpuppetry. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Greenwich, New South Wales

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. This has been going on for more than a year, so I ask for protection of similar duration. General Ization Talk 02:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    John Laurens

    Semi-protection: Persistent and uncited "boyfriend" language. SlightSmile 02:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    List of video games considered the best

    Semi-protection: An anonymous user is putting Undertale on the page with little to no valid sources. I request that Undertale be removed from the page and have the page be semi-protected to prevent this from happening again. 121.215.147.168 (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Ken Kratz

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 03:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Antonio Brown

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 05:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    John Adams

    Unprotection: Please unprotect article for non users to edit. 75.141.110.181 (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    @Courcelles:--Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=699091148"