User talk:Rjd0060: Difference between revisions

Archives 2007 Aug 13 – Oct 14 Oct 14 – Nov 11 Nov 12 – Dec 26 Dec 26 – → 2008 ← – Feb 28 Feb 29 – May 16 May 16 – Aug 22 Aug 23 – Dec 14 Dec 16 – → 2009 ← - Jun 20 Jun 30 - → 2010- 2014 Jul 2010 - Jun 2012 Jul 2012 - Dec 2014 2015 Jan 2015 - present /Archives for a full archive

Which you just deleted, was instantly reposted. Please delete it again. Curro2 (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Curro2. Articles deleted via the proposed deletion process can be re-created upon request. If you wish to ensure its deletion (should it be re-created again) you'll need to pursue AfD. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rjd0060,
I was looking at the Deletion Log and was surprised to see you deleted dozens of pages in the same minute which couldn't have been done manually. Can you share what tools you use? I'm a relatively new admin and I was just curious how this was done. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz. There are a number of semi-automated tools to assist with batch deletions. In this particular instance I used Twinkle. It is important to note for PROD deletions that they need to be checked individually ahead of time to make sure the PROD tag remained in place for seven days and the other criteria for PROD are met. Rjd0060 (talk) 00:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I don't know about that Twinkle feature. I agree about checking each page for deletion, I just evaluate them one at a time. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wish to restore this page with better content and reliable independent sources. Can I go ahead please. ???

Ref : Sonia Singh (journalist) (Expired PROD, concern was: No notability claimed and no WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG. She works in a media house NDTV; no independent sources present.)Shibanihk (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sonia Singh (journalist)

Hello, Please undelete above mentioned page. I wish to restore this page with better content and reliable independent sources. Can I go ahead please. ??? Now i have over 20 independent sources with neatly written content please. Thanks and Regards

Shibanihk (talk) 12:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shibanihk, I've restored the article. I apologize for the delay. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given the WP notability tag and the editing history - if you wish to transfer the material to the equivalent London Wiki page [1] would the issues be resolved? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've sent you a message. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 01:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied! Rjd0060 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this article that you deleted yesterday while checking the WikiProject Football article alerts archive for potential inappropriate recreations. According the archive, five years ago the article was PROD'ed and subsequently de-PROD'ed by User:The-Pope. I trust and respect his editor's judgement when it comes to questions of notability guidelines and deletion policy, so I suspect some relevant information got lost in the last five years. Would you mind checking the page's editing history to see what The-Pope's PROD and de-PROD rationales were? Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir Sputnik. Normally (as you probably know) if an article is de-prodded once it is then forever exempt from the PROD process and AFD must be pusued. However, the prod in 2011 that you mention was actually a BLPPROD which is slightly different. It was voided when references were added as that was the only criteria. Based on this I felt deletion was appropriate given that the new PROD was uncontested. If you have any other questions or wish for it to be restored let me know. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]