User talk:Rjd0060: Difference between revisions

Archives 2007 Aug 13 – Oct 14 Oct 14 – Nov 11 Nov 12 – Dec 26 Dec 26 – → 2008 ← – Feb 28 Feb 29 – May 16 May 16 – Aug 22 Aug 23 – Dec 14 Dec 16 – → 2009 ← - Jun 20 Jun 30 - → 2010- 2014 Jul 2010 - Jun 2012 Jul 2012 - Dec 2014 2015 Jan 2015 - present /Archives for a full archive

Hi. I've sent you a message. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 01:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replied! Rjd0060 (talk) 16:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this article that you deleted yesterday while checking the WikiProject Football article alerts archive for potential inappropriate recreations. According the archive, five years ago the article was PROD'ed and subsequently de-PROD'ed by User:The-Pope. I trust and respect his editor's judgement when it comes to questions of notability guidelines and deletion policy, so I suspect some relevant information got lost in the last five years. Would you mind checking the page's editing history to see what The-Pope's PROD and de-PROD rationales were? Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir Sputnik. Normally (as you probably know) if an article is de-prodded once it is then forever exempt from the PROD process and AFD must be pusued. However, the prod in 2011 that you mention was actually a BLPPROD which is slightly different. It was voided when references were added as that was the only criteria. Based on this I felt deletion was appropriate given that the new PROD was uncontested. If you have any other questions or wish for it to be restored let me know. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I didn't know that article alerts doesn't distinguish between the two types of PROD. Thanks for clearing that up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay if I restore the edit history of Tower (2016 film)? The film has since premiered at South by Southwest in Austin, Texas and it got a review in Variety magazine. I made a new article but would like to use some of the previous revisions. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Rjd0060 (talk) 04:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my page Len Saunders was deleted by you. Is there a way I can get my page restored? If there was something wrong with it, I will try to fix it. Please advise, thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Len_Saunders

Hi. I saw you deleted the page for the Michael Condon Memorial Award (AHL) and mentioned a few reasons why it had been deleted. I did find some relevant stuff in web searches, such as Condon's obituary, but I don't know if a severe lack of other non-league wide press releases would prevent another crack at working on a page. If a green light is given on a re-do, would one have to do some major searching in order to find credible sources before it would be considered acceptable? Or is the fact that it's obscure reason enough to delete the page altogether if someone tried again? Mandoli (talk) 00:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your appeal for more OTRS agents. You could start by reinstating my OTRS rights which were withdrawn for 'inactivity' ironically while I was in the middle of handling a delicate BLP issue ! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kudpung, applications (including re-applications) are taken centrally on Meta. Please reapply there. Rjd0060 (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]