User talk:SwisterTwister: Difference between revisions

No dramas please! Unpleasant and heated comments including vulgar names and other heated criticisms are not welcomed. SwisterTwister talk

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #262

You mentioned that the above mentioned article will be deleted within a week because it didnot have any credible reference apart from Hindustan Times. I have added new more credible references (Economic Times, Times of India, Business Today and Indian Express); even external links have been added for the same (other wikipedia articles). Do let me know if any further enhancement needs to be done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditya.mishra.ace (talk • contribs) 06:30, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you prodded Kea ho which in fact is a duplicate article of Kea Ho. Wgolf (talk) 04:17, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added additional citations to reliable sources as required for Personal Filing Cabinet, Anuraag Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuraag Singh (talk • contribs) 06:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are there specific sources that should be removed/changed or do you think the article itself should be removed from Wikipedia? I want to comply with the protocols and appreciate your guidance. Polqa (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Cis-Kuen Lun Tract is the same as the Trans-Karakoram Tract which I have edited extensively! You wanted sources. The Times Atlas link which shows the depiction of the northern border of Kashmir is the source! The map displays an enclosed area in northern Kashmir with the caption "Undefined Frontier area". The area encompassing the caption "Undefined Frontier area" is the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract. It is the same thing as the Trans-Karakoram Tract. The only difference is that the while the Trans-Karakoram Tract extends from the Karakoram Range northwards to the Kuen Lun Range, the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract extends from the Kuen Lun Range southwards towards the Karakoram range in central Kashmir. View the Times Atlas map of 1954 which depicts the northern border of Kashmir on the watershed of the Kuen Lun Range on the Taghdumbash Pamir, Mariom Pamir, and the Raskam range or ridge and depicts the caption "Undefined Frontier area" below it extending towards the Karakoram range and the Chhogori Peak K2 but not actually touching K2 as even the Times Atlas did not consider the K2 peak to be disputed. Nor did the Times Atlas consider the Shaksgam Valley disputed for that matter as can be seen in the 1954 map published by the Times Atlas.I am adding this because there is a concerted effort to restrict the Trans-Karakoram Tract to the Shaksgam Valley which is clearly erroneous and not borne out by records!Even the official map published by the The Government of Pakistan depicting the alignment of the northern Border of Kashmir in 1962, depicted much of the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract as part of Kashmir and the alignment published by the Government of Pakistan predominantly was similar to and coincided with the portrayal of the northern Border of Kashmir in 1954 by the Times Atlas which had predominantly depicted the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract as a part of Kashmir under the caption "Undefined Frontier area" though at places, the official position of the Government of

Pakistan deviated from the position of the Times Atlas and the Government of Pakistan even depicted areas as part of Kashmir which were to the north of the border of Kashmir as published in 1954 by the Times Atlas! Also for an idea of the extent of the Trans-Karakoram Tract or the Cis-Kuen Lun Tract, please view this map (C) from the Joe Schwartzberg's Historical Atlas of South Asia at DSAL in Chicagowith the caption, "The boundary of Kashmir with China as portrayed and proposed by Britain prior to 1947". The geographical and territorial extent of the Trans-Karakoram Tract or the Trans-Kuen Lun Tract is more or less the territory enclosed between the northern most line and the innermost lines! Also if one were to look for sources or references for the Trans-Karakoram Tract on the internet, the only references would be the articles on Wikipedia and no other. So there!

Hence I request you to redirect Cis-Kuen Lun Tract to Trans-Karakoram Tract and then there will be no need for a separate article titled Cis-Kuen Lun Tract. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.31.23 (talk) 07:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Nairji (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gitanjali Sinha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello David,

Thank you again for your review and the feedback. Appreciate it.

With complete regard and due respect to your judgement I would like to put my argument forward to reconsider the declination because the citations and links provided are from some of the leading publications in India. And moreover the links / references submitted are not "passing comments" about the subject, most of them are dedicated interviews given by her in main-line media (print as well as television) and these television channels are in top 10 channels based on the popularity as well as the viewership when it comes to entertainment segment in India.

Requesting you to re-look at it, the references and links have been kept very specific and the selected sources are notable from a geo-specific popularity viewpoint.

Looking forward to a response from your side.

Thanks and best regards, Nairji (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing Anthony Jakobs you spend less than 60 seconds and chose to tag it with {{notability}} using Page Curation in Previous revision of Anthony Jakobs. To me the article with sentences like

reeks of 14-year old writing his WP:AB, and I can't find a single thing that, to me, sounds like a credible claim of significance. Which do you find is a CCS?

Another thing I would have done prior to tagging with {{db-person}} would have been to remove this entire section

pursuant to WP:GRAPEVINE and obviously disregarding a post such as this. Why did you leave it in? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:47, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missed the above? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 12:39, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor No I have not, I saw it the first time, I saw the article the first time and I would've Speedied but imagined someone would remove as 'significant'. I Speedied it now but it was also removed, ha! We'll at best have G4 now for later. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 15:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But I asked you two questions, and you only sort-of replied to one.

(a) Why would you as a NPPer avoid A7 tagging with the argument that "(I) imagined someone would remove as 'significant'" if at the same time you say that "I would've Speedied"?

(b) Your reply to the BLP violation is anticipated.

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 21:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, again, I actually speedied it earlier today but it was removed. In case you've haven't noticed, Sam Sailor, several speedies and PRODs are roughly removed recently and several of mine included (*ahem* Adam9007 *ahem*), who seem to think even the slightest thing sometimes (for his example a listed filmography or discography) is a claim of significance. Looking again now, I would've taken my chances and gone with the speedy or PROD if needed. I hope this answers your question and we can resolve this thread. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:51, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, naturally your A7 of the article today was removed, as we are in the middle of the consensus driven part of DELPRO at AfD. Basic stuff.

Frankly, it does not make much sense to me what you are saying, yes, CCS is not written in stone, but in this case there is f*ck-O (US en: not a g*ddamn) CCS.

You still dodge the BLP violation. It is difficult to imagine, that you would not be aware of it, if you had seen it. Does that mean that you simply did not read the whole article before tagging?

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor I looked at the article but I still would not have been surprised if the tag had been removed given the apparent filmography and discography. It's certainly a useless article and is best tagged, I'm an advocate of tagging articles regardless of AfDs if it certainly still applies like this case. Easier for everyone and also AfD which has enough nominations as it is. As it is, I encountered an article a few moments ago that was controversial so I have simply tagged the hell out of it. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the less than 60 seconds you spend on the article, it seems highly unlikely that you should have had time to dig into the so-called "filmography". I also find it unlikely to think that a diligent NPPer would have fallen prey to this empty fluff.

The so-called "discography" was not present at the time you tagged it, so I'm not sure why you mention it. I hope that other editors than myself would hover over the songs and quickly conclude that the discography is another attempt to fool the superficial curator, e.g. subject had nothing to do with Justin Bieber's "Love Yourself" or any of the other four songs mentioned.

Until now nobody has reported a CCS was present in Anthony Jakobs, but since you mention Adam9007 as a user who "roughly removes speedies", why not ping him, and ask his opinion?

I take note that you disregard DELPRO when you state that I'm an advocate of tagging articles regardless of AfDs.

As for the BLP violation that you did not catch and still do not comment on: I urge you to spend much more time on actually reading articles that you intend to curate.

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: Can you give us some examples please? I don't recall ever saying that merely having a filmography or discography is a claim of significance. It's much more likely it had something to do with one or more of the songs/films in them (such as the subject playing a major role in a notable film which happened to be on the filmography). Adam9007 (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got a tag from you for a reference improvement for the article on the Sydney Glaciarium. Before removing the tag you applied I thought I'd point out that absolutely every section of content on that article is in fact referenced and also every reference is from a major national newspaper. Newspaper articles from the time period, citing an event that took place in that time period, are about as credible a source and high quality a source that you can get ... I completely disagree that the credibility of the references need to be improved and do beg you to acknowledge national newspaper articles from the given time period as being one of the most credible references possible. I purposely try to not use reflective articles, written about an event years after the fact. I am happy to discuss this further with you if you still do not agree that articles written for national newspapers by first hand witnesses to the event, at the time the event occurred, are a credible reference.

How I would improve this article on the historic Sydney Glaciarium is not credibility of the references, but the quantity of information on the article itself. Something I am in the process of doing and in the very spirit of the wiki - hope others do too. Orion 2012 (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added several more sources to People Against Bureaucracy since you came by. Are there enough to warrant removing the insufficient sources template? Maswimelleu (talk) 14:11, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the page Zabdiel de Jesus is also a redirect, which the page Zabdiel De Jesús basically is the same guy! Wgolf (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Lx3h (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Charged Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, thanks for your second rejection and 3rd from Wiki's editor team as it allows me to provide even more references from international coverages of Charged Hong Kong despite the fact that it is a year old. There are now 56 references and they are either critically important to the development of the officially registered charity in Hong Kong or simply highly notable such as Forbes, Bloomberg, Reuters, CNBC, BBC, International Business Times, etc. Just to name a few. I have also written the article according to the Wikipedia's "guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_answer_to_life,_the_universe,_and_everything, which states that "Articles generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic." As far as anyone can tell, age of the organisation as the reason you have repeatedly rejected my article on, in this case on Charged Hong Kong as a registered charity doing good things to the world advocating clean air through electric vehicle adaptation, does not appear in any sense as a specific requirement and prerequisite by Wikipedia as a reason for rejection of article submission. What's more, using 'age' of a person, an organisation and particularly for a registered charity to judge its influence to the world is immature and unprofessional. Simply because by naming a minimum age requirement to be worthy of an article on Wikipedia, there will be thousands of counter-examples on Wikipedia.

Hello SwisterTwister. I'm a very new Wikipedia contributor. Not even beginning to be an editor. Earlier this month I added an article about Joseph McCormackMD. Today, I wanted to start an article about his son Arthur T McCormack but somehow instead of putting it in my sandbox, I put in somewhere for all the world to see. I'm just about finished with it, but in the meantime, I'd really like to understand what changes you made so I'll better know how to write in the future. Plus, I've got some questions about things that aren't working correctly and would love it if someone like you could help me through the sweet spots. Drvalsummers (talk) 01:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Pyounger (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dion Lee (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good evening,

Thank you for taking the time to review my application. Can I include these additional news articles in the external links area or do these need to be referenced throughout the text?

Kind regards,

Phoebe

I've created a few new pages recently and it always seems to be you that patrols them. Thank you for your tireless work! All the best, Dubbin^{u | t | c} 10:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some citation link to Promo Direct page. Kindly review Susan (talk). —Preceding undated comment added 10:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I ve added an article in swedish about the cuba project. there is more in swedish out there, that should be added by swedish speakers. Question, the commercial/fashion work does not count for notability ? thank you (Meridian00 (talk) 14:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hi, sorry about removing the prod. I didn't even notice I had. Probably an edit conflict as you said. The page author had taken Wgolf and me through a couple rounds of adding fake refs and removing a BLPprod so I was coming to the conclusion that AfD was for the best as it is harder to game (ie you can't kill it just by removing the tag). I'm glad the article is gone now anyhow. Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see its talk page. Deus vult! Crusadestudent (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Du Dang also known as NuckleDu is a well known name in the Fighting Game Community. He has a Team Liquid sponsorship, has won many tournaments, and is a recognizable villain for his excessive taunting. He is getting plenty of coverage from mainstream eSports sites. He's also the best Street Fighter player in the Florida region and is considered one of the best SF players of the younger generation. Ask Valoem, Prisencolin, or NeoChaosX and they will all say yes. Thank You for your cooperation. ULTRA-DARKNESS^{:) 2 CHAT} 19:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team Liquid is among the largest esports sponsors, being apart of it certainly means he is a professional. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 19:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear David!

I am user Valery Surkoff. I created a page dedicated to musician Dmitry Polyakov. You checked this page, but many users cast doubt on this page and want to delete it. Can you help in this question and what can I do for save this page.

User:Valery Surkoff —Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valery Surkoff Hello, he's currently still questionable for the applicable notability, WP:Notability (music), you need to still add any additional amount of sources such as news, anything that is in-depth and third-party. Please also see WP:Referencing for beginners. If you want, you can also request this be userfied to your own userspace, away from mainspace. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please check.Etimena (talk) 20:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note from the relevant activity log that you 'reviewed' this article (which I created earlier today). Can I ask what your opinion was of it? I ask mainly as it has been Speedily Deleted under criteria which I do not believe apply. Please see User talk:RHaworth#On_the_Wight for details. I would be interested to know whether your 'review' ended in a judgement for Speedy Deletion (and if so, why), or if RHaworth simply reached this view themselves. Thanks, --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 21:47, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of On the Wight. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Peeky44 _{What's on your mind?} 08:12, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think it's the same articles: Qadeimah and Al Qadimah. The same location. Can you help with it?--27century (talk) 22:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing Connor Flegal, SwisterTwister.

Unfortunately MrX has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I'm not sure why this was marked as reviewed. It's utter nonsense.

To reply, leave a comment on MrX's talk page.

MrX I'm not sure I understand, I tagged it as speedy, why unreview it? SwisterTwister talk 01:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to the history, you didn't tag it at all. I did, however, tag it for speedy deletion as vandalism. - MrX 02:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MrX I suppose my click of "Save" never went through. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that explains it.- MrX 02:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

ref: www.wikipedia.org/wiki/aftab_group

i made an article on Aftab Group of Bangladesh, where i had my internship few years back. And now have no relationship with them. (So no chance for any interest conflict)

However i found that the article has been nominated for deletion.

I know that my article is not very very informative for a big group of business like aftab group.

but i sense their presence should be on wiki.

Please do not delete my article at once rather help me out in retaining the same, as i am new as a writer on wiki..

Thanks

Moushum Ahmed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imcdhaka (talk • contribs) 06:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You are not from Butuan do you? Do not delete that ADFiL Corporation article because this is part of "On the Job Training" Program of Father Saturnino Urios University. That article is about construction company in Butuan not yours. Please do not delete that article nor delete my account immediately!!!

SALAMAT KADYAW (Thank You in english) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 06:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an International Passport, go to Butuan and face me. Please do not delete my account and my articles that I created and edited. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, not to delete all articles and accounts. Thank you and SALAMAT KADYAW DONG.(dude) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronald Galope Barniso (talk • contribs) 06:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of AutoWed, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is quite obviously ludicrous, and this kind of silly stuff is unworthy of an article in a serious encyclopedia, yeah? Reliable sources assert at least some WP:SIGNIFICANCE. WP:AfD candidate? Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the templated speedy deletion decline. This article appears to me laughable, unrelentingly silly, and unworthy of an encyclopedia article. But it appears to have had significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

SwisterTwister, long-time colleague and Wiki-friend, your thoughts about this? --Shirt58 (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So Fricken Cute!!! <3

Ravenrene123 (talk) 20:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Thanks for all your reviewing of the French track biops I have been doing.

I just thought I'd mention that the source in many of the articles:

Docathlé2003, Fédération française d'athlétisme, 2003

is an actual 650 page book that the French Athletic Foundation publishes and sells for 20 euros. I just bought a copy over the net last Sunday and I will have the book to check the sources by the end of June.

Endo999 (talk) 21:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hanspeterleupp (talk) 21:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SwisterTwister. You tagged "BoChamp" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you.Template:Z19. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you accidently put 2 prod tags on Micks (though its not eligible for a BLP prod) Wgolf (talk) 01:50, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of tagging this as needing sources when it is an obvious speedy candidate? Delta Force was not in Somalia in 1933. They did not even exist in 1933. The Battle of Mogadishu was in 1993 and we already have an article on it at Battle of Mogadishu (1993). The new article even uses the date 1993. I've tagged it for speedy. Meters (talk) 02:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Mirrezd (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mir Abdolrez Daryabeigi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I already answer your question: If Mr. Daryabeig's art works are permanently collected by major museums?

Public & Private collectors: Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art
The reference is the book (catalogue)Iranian Modern Art Movement
Comment :The Iranian Collection of the Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art, Dryabeigi, pg.112 &113, published in 1385 (2006) by TMoCA(Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art) The book is in Farsi & English. short biography. there are 2 full page images of his work. Mirrezd (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear David!

I want to get your opinion on the following question: Two users (User:Staszek Lem and User:Primefac) actively edit pages Dmitry Polyakov. I had to cancel editing them because they were unfounded (it's my opinion), after 4 times I was blocked. After that, I saw a message in a conversation, look here [[1]] this indicating their conspiracy. What do you think about it? I want to know your opinion?--Valery Surkoff (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Valery Surkoff I can assure you they are not conspiring anything and it's simply that your article is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 06:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister Ok. Thank you.--Valery Surkoff (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I restored your PROD tag on GPX Global Systems Inc. after the creator removed it with no explanation when I was working on copyediting the article. Since I restored your Prod the creator removed it again. Not sure what you might want done. fyi Fouetté rond de jambe en tournant (talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that Seraphim (American Band) be kept up and not considered for deletion, as they are an established, even if unsigned, musical group. They have worked with higher-class musicians such as Johnny Franck of Attack Attack! and their music is legally obtainable through iTunes purchases.

Proof of Johnny Franck's work with them: http://www.johnnyfranck.com/

• Under selected credits and discography, Seraphim's music is listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apartion (talk • contribs) 06:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. It should not be necessary to say, that we don't tag with A1 and A3 for the first 10-15 minutes after creation. In 粉絲專頁 yours came after only 4 minutes. I posted a {{subst:Welcomeen-zh}} to the new user Merlynjovita (talk · contribs). Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, You had reviewed the article I had created and mention as I didn't have proper Citations. I have added more citation to the article please let me know how to take of those error messages. Here is the article URL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Brooks_(musician) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukundxg (talk • contribs) 08:55, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Upon your review on April 26, that the article for Draft:ATP Electronics still needed more notability references, I have since then added more notable references to the article. would you kindly assess if the article can moved to public ? Thank you 10:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by T.L Cheng ( ATP Electronics ) (talk • contribs)

The sources listed on the Joey Fatts article are very reputable, Vibe Magazine, Billboard, MTVNEWS, XXL Magazine...... I'm not sure how much more credible it gets for a newer artist... He also has an upcoming tour that will give him much more press but I need his wiki up. Please please let me know how I can get this darn thing up because it has already taken up far more time than I allotted for it. Thank you so much for your help! JJBlvcklist (talk) 11:57, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• BjoernSgav (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gothaer Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister. Could you please let me know which passages in my submission are still too promotional? It would be a great help. Unfortunately your statement is slightly too generic and I am confused. Thanks in advance! BjoernSgav (talk) 12:19, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Diff of Me Adarayai you tagged with A7 10 min (9 min 59 sec actually) after creation with the edit summary ???? Over 10 minutes and nothing.......... Why would you tag what a Google search appears to reveal is a teledrama with A7? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor It's not about that, it's simply that the user needs to give reasonable time to at least actually start the article. I firmly comment I'm not interested with any heated comments and criticism. Frankly you may think I tag anything too soon, but knowing everyone else, it's always gets tagged sooner or later. Also, these users are obligated to at least give an reasonably acceptable article, or else restart it when they are set to begin. SwisterTwister talk 07:22, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can understand you are not interested in criticism. I think there are other more productive ways to content creation in a case like this, e.g. tagging with {{New user article}}. But you again dodge the question: why did you tag with A7 specifically? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Sailor I cordially welcome that you understand, I tagged it because it was applicable for both A3 and A7, no actual context aside from that and then also no significance. Even if there is information, there was enough reasonable time to at least make changes aside from that one action. SwisterTwister talk 07:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is a teledrama eligible for A7? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:32, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Dear SwisterTwister, You have always been very kind, I observe that most of the new articles on Wikipedia I create you are the most and only Wikipedian who reviews my created articles, but here I am asking you for the help regarding y talk page archive. So its requested you kindly tell me how to create the archive of my User talk page and I also request you could you please make archive of my talk page or tell me how to make it. Thanks..--Jogi 007 (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor's Barnstar

Just a BIG thank you for the support I have received from you in chat on Wikipedia. As a newbie here, I have the utmost admiration for the people here who give their time - extremely generously - to help others, like myself, and tomaintain this amazing free resource - that is Wikipedia. The more I come here, the more impressed I am. There are corporate organisations that pay large wages to people, that don't provide any where close to the service that I have received on Wikipedia, and when you consider that the Wikipedia service is provided by committed volunteers who don't get paid anything, I feel I have to pay my respects and major gratitude to people like yourself. BIG respect and simply Thank You VERY much! Keep up the great work. Monty heath (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Good job reviewing the articles on New Pages Feed. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 18:51, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have proposed the page I am writing for deleting under what criteria, you know about theme? you wish sabotage? you want win something wiki award?. ..... The page is just creating in these moments and when you did that, you are demonstrating unknowing and disturbing. First I end the page and after you read and critizice, so is the correct method, meanwhile, please abstaint to interfere, no one will pay for that and you could learn something. It is not thrue?

--Siredejoinville (talk) 19:04, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ST! Just an FYI that the Earwig Bot is back online for botful copyright checking of articles that seem too copyrighty. Coren's bot is still offline, so the manual tool is all we have for the moment. Earwig is at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ Thanks! Crow^Caw 19:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I added three references to the Kora Boufflert article, so can I take off the BLP notice.

Endo999 (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oceandocs (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:OceanDocs: Repository of Ocean Publications (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have tried twice to submit an article on OceanDocs. The second time I followed exactly the format of a similar repository Aquatic Commons which was accepted by Wikipedia. The reviewer still thinks it is an advertisement! I am trying to describe an information product - a global ocean repository hosted by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (a Unesco agency). I do not see how I can make it acceptable. I do not understand how a description of an ocean information product is an advertisement? Oceandocs (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oceandocs (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki-kitten is here to say thank you for your extensive contributions and activity in the deletion discussions!

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Bingargiola (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sustainable Scuba Diving (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

What other information do you think would be needed in this article? I looked at many different sources, peer reviewed articles, scientific journals - and I cited them all, so I am a little confused about the references. I developed this page as an independent study with my college advisor while taking a scuba diving course. Based on direct experience and what I learned from the research, I believe I created a thorough and complete page. I think it is an important concept and needs to have its own page, not exist within the larger page of just Scuba Diving.

Thank you,

Brendan Ingargiola

Hi! Since you accepted three of my drafts (Li Yajuan, Lan Shizhang, Liu Xiuhua) could you comment on another one of equal stub quality (Draft:Cai Jun)? It was declined by a different reviewer. Thank you! 93.238.17.57 (talk) 19:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you avoiding me or something? We seem to have missed each other on IRC for a few days now. Tom29739 ^[talk] 23:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]