User talk:Oscar22: Difference between revisions

Thanks for uploading Image:230030b.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the colours of the non-elimination as you wish to any colour you fancy. The rationale for having them all in blue is under Wikipedia's policy of colours in which colours should NOT be the only distinguishing factor among different messages/ideas/results that are supposed to be conveyed. This will allow people with colourless screens or are colour blind to have full accessibility to the article. Please check WP:Color for more info and to go to the Season 12 talk page if you want to discuss this issue or read more about it. DanielTAR (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...What the?? Do you even know what the heck you're saying in my talk page?? Forget it. I'll just sum it up... Blue has been agreed and fixed as the colour to symbolise ANY kind of Non-Elimination. Underlines or italics are placed so that colourblind people will be able to differientiate between a red eliminated placing and a blue non eliminated placing. There is absolutely NO NEED to change the colour. Basically, even if I don't undo your edits, someone else will. So stop changing the colours because it's the one causing inconsistency and confusion. You need not reply to this. Once again, I urge you to read Season 12's Talk Page if you're still not sure. DanielTAR (talk) 03:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Iron Fist (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have not discussed on the article talk page regarding your changes. Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Iron Fist (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Alex^TW 00:00, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Iron Fist (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- S ^talk/_contribs 21:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]