Jump to content

Winnecke 4: Difference between revisions

Coordinates: Sky map 12h 22m 12.5s, 58° 04′ 59″
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ejeidm123 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Wwwwolf (talk | contribs)
Merged duplicated reference
Line 23: Line 23:
The nearby nebula observed by Hevelius may have been the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 4290. The galaxy, being 12th magnitude, may have been bright enough to notice for large telescopes at the time, but not quite bright enough for Messier.
The nearby nebula observed by Hevelius may have been the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 4290. The galaxy, being 12th magnitude, may have been bright enough to notice for large telescopes at the time, but not quite bright enough for Messier.


In 2016, by using parallax measurements from the [[Gaia (spacecraft)|Gaia satellite]], it was definitively proven that the two stars comprising the double star (HD 238107 and HD 238108) are entirely unrelated,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00834v1|title=Gaia Shows That Messier 40 is Definitely Not a Binary Star|last=Merrifield, Gray, Haran|first=|date=|website=|publisher=arXiv|access-date=5 December 2016}}</ref> confirming the previous suggestion by Skiff and Nugent. Distances are 350±30 pc and 140±5 pc for the two objects. The further is just over twice as far as the nearer. <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00834v1|title=Gaia Shows That Messier 40 is Definitely Not a Binary Star|last=Merrifield, Gray, Haran|first=|date=|website=|publisher=arXiv|access-date=5 December 2016}}</ref>
In 2016, by using parallax measurements from the [[Gaia (spacecraft)|Gaia satellite]], it was definitively proven that the two stars comprising the double star (HD 238107 and HD 238108) are entirely unrelated,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.00834v1|title=Gaia Shows That Messier 40 is Definitely Not a Binary Star|last=Merrifield, Gray, Haran|first=|date=|website=|publisher=arXiv|access-date=5 December 2016}}</ref> confirming the previous suggestion by Skiff and Nugent. Distances are 350±30 pc and 140±5 pc for the two objects. The further is just over twice as far as the nearer. <ref =/>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 15:15, 28 June 2017

Winnecke 4

Winnecke 4 double star
Observation data
Epoch J2000.0      Equinox J2000.0
Constellation Ursa Major
Right ascension 12h 22m 12.5s
Declination +58° 4' 59"
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.65 + 10.10
Distance510 ly
(156 pc)
Spectral typeG0+F8
Other designations
M40, BD+56 1372, HD 238107 + HD 238108, SAO 28353 + SAO 28355, CCDM 12223+5805

Winnecke 4 (also known as Messier 40 or WNC 4) is a double star in the constellation Ursa Major. It was discovered by Charles Messier in 1764 while he was searching for a nebula that had been reported in the area by Johannes Hevelius. Not seeing any nebulae, Messier catalogued this double star instead. It was subsequently rediscovered by Friedrich August Theodor Winnecke in 1863, and included in the Winnecke Catalogue of Double Stars as number 4. Burnham calls M40 "one of the few real mistakes in the Messier catalog," faulting Messier for including it when all he saw was a double star, not a nebula of any sort.[1]

In 1991 the separation between the components was measured at 51.7", an increase since Messier's time. Data gathered by astronomers Brian Skiff (2001) and Richard L. Nugent (2002) strongly suggested that this was merely an optical double star rather than a physically connected system.[2]

The nearby nebula observed by Hevelius may have been the nearby spiral galaxy NGC 4290. The galaxy, being 12th magnitude, may have been bright enough to notice for large telescopes at the time, but not quite bright enough for Messier.

In 2016, by using parallax measurements from the Gaia satellite, it was definitively proven that the two stars comprising the double star (HD 238107 and HD 238108) are entirely unrelated,[3] confirming the previous suggestion by Skiff and Nugent. Distances are 350±30 pc and 140±5 pc for the two objects. The further is just over twice as far as the nearer. [3]

References

  1. ^ Burnham's Celestial Handbook, "Ursa Major: M40", p. 1982
  2. ^ "Messier 40". SEDS Messier Database. Retrieved 13 March 2013.
  3. ^ a b Merrifield, Gray, Haran. "Gaia Shows That Messier 40 is Definitely Not a Binary Star". arXiv. Retrieved 5 December 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links