Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montana Mendy (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Montana Mendy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotion by non-notable person. The two sources given consist of an article that has no mention of him and a single photo in a photo gallery of "Linux people" in a source of no reliability. No sources identified by Google for "Montana Mendy" help to satisfy WP:GNG. Largoplazo (talk) 02:58, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 03:31, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 03:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 03:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I cannot find any sources to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Seems that the notability situation hasn't changed since the last time the article was deleted at AfD, even though the article has been edited by *checks clipboard* MontanaMendy. Newspaper archive search came up empty. Subject does not have significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, and does not quality under any SNG. Bakazaka (talk) 04:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I would have {{db-g11}}'d it if I had encountered it earlier. – Athaenara ✉ 04:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Can't find anything to show he meets guidelines to have an article on here. Just because he allegedly worked on Linux doesn't make him automatically notable. THEFlint Shrubwood (talk) 04:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not a notable person.PE65000 (talk) 11:21, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]