Jump to content

Talk:Avatar (2009 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:241:300:b610:7d07:2974:4f71:665e (talk) at 02:50, 18 July 2022 (→‎Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2022: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Good articleAvatar (2009 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 28, 2010Good article nomineeListed
June 1, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
April 6, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 21, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on January 26, 2010.
Current status: Good article


Redirect to Avatar:The Last Airbender

I want to ask y'all whether or not it would be a good idea to include a redirect to Avatar:The Last Airbender. Some folks get that series confused with the James Cameron movie, so it might be a good idea to include such a redirect (and one on the A:TLA page to this article). Accurateworldwar (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, and the Shyamalan movie was not titled Avatar because of this. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like we totally should include a redirect to the Avatar: The Last Airbender, as both this movie and the series share the same name (Personally, I think that 'The Last Airbender' is just a subtitle). We don't have to include a redirect to the M. Night Shyamalan movie as the title is just 'The Last Airbender'. Bigboithena (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back at no. 1

Is this worth adding? Kailash29792 (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course. The updated box office numbers should be added, and Endgame's mention should be changed. ภץאคгöร 17:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Link on note 3, AVATAR 2D is going to a page giving "error 410" Astenor (talk) 10:05, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like the "Related Media" section should be removed from this article and moved/merged with Avatar_(franchise) page. This page is about the 2009 movie whereas the Avatar_(franchise) page is about the franchise. Stage Adaptation, Theme Park, and Novels are about the franchise and not the first movie. 2600:1700:D8:8040:9551:D02F:89D8:7DF0 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 re-release

The main text does NOT include any sort of mention of the 50+M revenue from the 2021 Chinese release. Considering it gave the "title" back it should be mentioned somehow in the main text. 188.27.42.181 (talk) 15:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Avatar (franchise) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avatar (franchise) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avatar (franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office Error

There seems to be a box office error, stating: "Avatar is the second highest-grossing movie of all time after Gone with the Wind with a total of more than $3 billion.

Gone with the Wind actually grossed over 390 million worldwide, as opposed to 3 billion. 216.30.159.210 (talk) 12:10, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussed at Talk:Avatar (2009 film)/Archive 26#Star wars. DonIago (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2022

Please add the following template to the article:

2601:241:300:B610:7D07:2974:4F71:665E (talk) 02:50, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]