User talk:Carolina2k22

This is Carolina2k22's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

The article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General and Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:41, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General for comments about the article, and Talk:Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note that you’ll probably see me on your watchlist as I’ve just checked your contributions. I see very solid work; well done! I had a look because whilst the Make it 16 is a solid piece of work written by a fellow Kiwi, your user name has only recently appeared on my radar. Hence my interest. I checked contributions with a view of possibly assigning autopatrolled but you are too far from the numerical threshold of 25 new articles. Are you aware of WP:DYK? I suggest that you nominate the Make it 16 article. Schwede66 19:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora and thank you, I appreciate it! I have heard of WP:DYK but hadn't looked much into it. I've nominated it now at Template:Did you know nominations/Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General. I'm definitely quite a bit away from needing/being suitable for autopatrolled, but I am looking to do a lot more work wrt law in NZ (and encourage others interested to do so as well, hence my recent discussion on WT:NZ).

Thank you again! Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 02:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you coming to the Wellington WikiCon? If that's not on your agenda yet, can I encourage you to give this some consideration? Attendees of the two previous WikiCons got a lot of of them. Schwede66 03:12, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mentioning this, I've thought about it a little bit and I'm not entirely sure. I'll definitely keep it under consideration for the next couple weeks. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 03:56, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Carolina2k22:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a two week long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 14 January 2023.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help! ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 10:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 10:22, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My wikipedia page has been denied twice. The main reason I'm given is that the subject, Dr. Ralph Dacey, does not qualify because of the guidelines for notability. Yet, when I look up those guidelines "academics" is a guideline. I'm truly baffled by this. In the neurosurgery world, Dr. Dacey is an international presence and I believe the articles I cite in his bio reflect that. Any help you can provide would be great, but please don't point me back to the notatbility guidelines. Courtneykchazen (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Courtneykchazen The WP:ACADEMIC guideline isn't purely that the person is an academic, it entails a broader amount of requirements within it. It is its own requirement. When searching online I don't find too much independent sources of Dr. Ralph Dacey. This could be because of my region which is partly why we rely on the draft article as well.

The article in its current form lacks a substantial number of citations so verifiability cannot be established. An example is his birth year, there are no citations for that. If you're willing to correct errors, I'm sure another editor will be able to review the draft in more depth. But as it is currently, it cannot be accepted. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 15:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, My draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Clkluigi#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation%3A_Montreal_declaration_on_animal_exploitation_%28January_5%29 has been refused. The reasons for the refusal are clear in themselves, but I don't see how to apply them. I felt I had sourced everything correctly and the peacock terms are quotes in sections dedicated to feedback, which seem balanced to me. Could you help me correct this article ? Should I delete the "reactions" section? Thanks in advance for sharing your expertise. I asked here but received no answer. Clkluigi (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Clkluigi I'll have a better look at it, and I'll help improve the article myself over the next few days; then we can resubmit it. Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 01:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in Articles for Creation's January 2023 Backlog Drive! You reviewed 21 drafts, for a total of 30.5 points. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Carolina2k22 • (talk) • (edits) 01:21, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in November 2022 the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that the voting age of 18 was unjustified age discrimination in Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Make It 16 Incorporated v Attorney-General), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]