Jump to content

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Softlemonades (talk | contribs) at 15:52, 24 November 2023 (→‎External links: reference 1 mirror). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3)
CourtSupreme Court of the United Kingdom
Citation[2018] UKSC 3

R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 3) [2018] UKSC 3[1] is a 2018 legal case concerning the admissibility of a leaked diplomatic cable as evidence in a dispute over the legality of a marine protected area in the British Indian Ocean Territory.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Bancoult, R (on the application of) (No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Respondent)[2018] UKSC 3 (8 February 2018)".


Flag of United KingdomJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R_(Bancoult)_v_Secretary_of_State_for_Foreign_and_Commonwealth_Affairs_(No_3)&oldid=1186644548"