Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaidam Health

Vaidam Health (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created evading a salting of Vaidam. Sources:

1. No mention of the topic I can find
2. A student's final exam is not a reliable source
3. Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
4. Not in-depth enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH
5. Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
6. Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
7. This reads like a press release, despite the lack of explicit language admitting to such, and has no listed author so I'm not convinced it's reliable.
8. Consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
9. This looks promising, but I can't access it.
10. No mention of the topic I can find
11. WP:TOI should not be used to establish notability for companies, and in any event except for the first paragraph which doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH this consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND
12. Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH
13. Does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and given the tone and the lack of a listed author I'm not convinced it's reliable either.
14. The article itself is both from the Times and India and does not discuss the topic in sufficient depth to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. The case study itself is more interesting, but does that make a reliable source?
15. Duplicate of source 9
16. Primary source

So there may be a vague glimmer of merit smothered under the REFBOMB, but not enough to let this title-gaming slip by without review. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Travel and tourism, Medicine, and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Great source assessment. I did a spot check of the current sourcing and also a quick search online. Cannot find anything that meets WP:ORGCRIT. Plenty of mentions, churnalism, or otherwise unreliable sourcing. Nothing that would show CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete: made to evade a salting, fails multiple guidelines, cites various strange sources. if that's not grounds for deletion i don't know what is. Noelle!!! (summon a demon or read smth) 16:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]