Talk:Rosetta (restaurant)

Rosetta (restaurant) has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 3, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Food and drink: Foodservice Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

GA Review

Passed. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 05:11, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rosetta (restaurant)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 02:52, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: That Tired Tarantula (talk · contribs) 06:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article during the next few days. That Tired Tarantula^Burrow 06:44, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

First look

Criteria

No maintenance templates: Y
Relavent images are present: Y
No recent edit wars: Y

Copyright

No copyright violations/plagiarism: Y
Images are free (unless a rationale is given if they are not) and tagged: Y

Prose

Broadness and focus

The article stays focused and has all the sections that an article about a restaurant should have and there is no significant information omitted. Looks good.

Writing and MoS

The article is very well-written and follows MoS guidelines.

There's one little spot that I noticed at the start of the second paragraph of the reception section:

"Miguel Rivera recommended for the magazine Chilango bread and pasta because of their cooking style; a reviewer from Bon Appétit shared the opinion and approved the pasta."

The first part of this sentence is a bit wordy, so could it be changed to something like, "For the magazine Chilango, Miguel Rivera..." and then the rest of the prose could be kept the same?

Reworded

Neutrality

At first, I was a bit conerned about due weight, since there are only positive reviews presented in the article, but after looking onine, there doesn't seem to be any mixed or negative reviews from reliable sources. There's a couple words to watch, but they help out with explaining things and making the writing in the article flow; assumptions aren't made.

References

Evaluating sources

All of the sources are reliable, secondary, and independent.

Citation accuracy

1. The restaurant having reservations is kind of an indirect assumption, but it's a reasonable one; I'm not concerned about it.

2 and 3. Where do the sources mention the restaurant being a la carte?

I changed them with a more explicit source

6 and 7. Same as with the first reference, the cities or states that the towns and areas are located is inferred, but it's logical, so it's fine.

7. The source mentions how the dough has been fermenting for nine years, but doesn't mention when the restaurant was first made.

Reworded. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

21. The Michelin guide doesn't mention how it is the first year for restaurants in Mexico to be rewarded Michelin stars.

Sourced.

Everything else looks good.

Overall

Everything meets the GA criteria. Excellent article; great work!