Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphetamines and Friendly Fire Incidents
Appearance
Amphetamines and Friendly Fire Incidents
- Amphetamines and Friendly Fire Incidents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously CSd'd. It appears to be a (well disguised?) position paper. delete - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC) UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- The previous CSD was not due (directly) to content - it was an author blanking CSD, after it was pointed out that the article was problematic in its then-reference-less state. (I was the one who both called for the deletion after author blanking and had pointed author to the problem.) In other words, both the previous deletion and the primary reason for the blanking no longer apply. That's not to take any stance on the deletion discussion, just to take the weight off of the "previously CDS'd" status. -Nat Gertler (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork of Tarnak Farm incident Nick-D (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, possibly redirect: sure seems to be a fork per Nick, not to mention some SYNTH/OR, and essentially being an essay. There might be some material worth keeping, if merged to Tarnak Farm incident and/or Amphetamine (I can't find an article on military use of stimulant drugs, but if there were, that would be the best place to redirect). There might also be value as a redirect... bahamut0013wordsdeeds 20:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)