User talk:Asgardian

For what it's worth ... I recently was reading the Red Hulk article, which provided me with some interesting reading on the talk page for a while ... but I although we have little contact, most of my recent path crossing with your editting I've been quite please with. I noted a good degree of thoughtfulness in your edits, comments and responses which is impressive ... if not exemplar. So in short, a bravo to you, it seems clearly well deserved. Best of luck in cosmic Marvel-land it seems you're doing great virtual guardianship of it. -Sharp962 (talk) 02:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Due to extensive ban evasion I am resetting the ban on this account, per WP:Ban#Evasion and enforcement. If you have any questions about this I'm happy to try and answer them, but I note that I'm doing this procedurally: If you think that the ban should no longer apply, or otherwise find the reset incorrect, please discuss this with arbcom.
Amalthea 16:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Spartan Pride"? Seriously? If you're also that "Cosmic Egg" fellow that popped up elsewhere with identical personality, arrogance, and attitude, you're starting to get as bad as JJonz in trying to select handles that you think will annoy me. Dave (talk) 04:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are banned indefinitely for repeated evasion of the 1 year ban placed in your arbitration case. This repeated evasion has been confirmed by CheckUser. You may email the Arbitration Committee directly if you have any questions. KnightLago (talk) 23:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I was invited to comment by SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} regarding this ([1]) but can't access the page as still blocked. Could someone kindly advise as to how to proceed? Some valid points have been made I would like to address them. Many thanks Asgardian (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can always add comments here and have them copied over; you could use the {{helpme}} template to attract someone to assist you. Amalthea 11:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please do so. I will leave a note at WT:AC/N drawing people's attention to this talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 02:17, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My request to be unblocked seems to have solicited a variety of responses. Some are perhaps a tad melodramatic (I never thought of myself as a recidivist) or being "relentless". That said, I can understand why there is cause for concern. I was one of several people who at the time engaged in consistent edit warring to ensure that the articles were written "my way". As I indicated in my initial statement, I realize that this was a mistake. A near-perfect article (if there is such a thing) is wonderful and a point of pride - but not if you've walked over everyone else to reach this goal. The process is just as important as the outcome. I know now that instead of say, just verbally crushing a junior's editor's effort, I should explain to them why their edits need reworking and refer to policy (teaching to fish so they eat for a lifetime and all that).

I'd also like to applaud Nightscream for his civility and being a firm voice of reason. "Narcissistic" was right on the money. I would hope everyone can keep such perspective as we discuss this.

Finally, I see there have been some claims re: sockpuppets. Definitely not me - although there are some hardcore fans in my native city who I believe dabble in Wikipedia (after all, not everyone is based in the US).

Feel free to ask questions as we proceed. Regards Asgardian (talk) 23:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]