User talk:96.246.139.135

Can you please stop changing, the nc-17 rating is now adults only heres the link in case you don't believe me. And stop reporting people over ratings, don't change them nor semi-protect. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2OLRrocn3s the link for the NC-17 rated film and you will see im not lying.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:54, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding an age recommendation to the PG rating at Motion Picture Association of America film rating system as you did here. As explained at Talk:Motion Picture Association of America film rating system#PG rating the MPAA does not advise an age. You have attempted to alter the wording on five occasions now despite being reverted by three different editors. If the MPAA has revised the rating then you need to provide a WP:Reliable source. Betty Logan (talk) 21:05, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Motion Picture Association of America film rating system shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Betty Logan (talk) 01:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• A case has been filed about your conduct at WP:AN3#User:96.246.139.135 reported by User:Betty Logan (Result: ). Betty Logan (talk) 19:34, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Betty Logan (talk) Some sources say 10, but the MPAA doesn't specify. So i think its right. Look if you stop reporting users and protecting pages i djmex will no longer bother you but we will need to stay away from each other. Ok hope you understand thanks.