Jump to content

User talk:GoodDay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 108.28.162.100 (talk) at 16:44, 30 November 2014 (→‎Thanks: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello to all fellow Wikipedians. GoodDay 22:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC).[reply]

This user has been on Wikipedia for 18 years, 7 months and 27 days.

You may be wondering why my archives only start at August 2007. The reason: I didn't archive my pages before that date, I merely deleted them (as I didn't know how to archive). Therefore, if anyone wishes to see material before August 2007? check out this talkpage's 'history'.

Awards

I've an Awards page, where I keep a list of Wikipedia awards bestowed upon me.

Edit count & Pie chart

Edit records

DYK for Florence Nagle

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to all the editors who worked on this article :) GoodDay (talk) 00:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is needed

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this consensus discussion? I know you did this last month, but it wasn't a formal consensus discussion, but now it is. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User/ NamParks Project listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User/ NamParks Project. Since you had some involvement with the User/ NamParks Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Mdann52talk to me! 18:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First time involved in arbitration

Regarding this comment: note that Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement was previously filed regarding Eric, resulting in his restriction in participating in the RfA process, and Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Austrian economics topic banned Carolmooredc from the subject under scrutiny in that case. isaacl (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. That's not good :( GoodDay (talk) 22:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just some advice: I suggest you don't need to repeat yourself on the proposed decision talk page. You've stated your views several times now; rest assured you've been heard. isaacl (talk) 17:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In agreement. I can only hope that the Arbs will heed my advice. Even now, the divisions are hardening at that talkpage & no decision has been made yet. GoodDay (talk) 17:30, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If it had been up to me? all involved parties would've been given each a 3-month topic ban, from GGTF. But, it's not up to me :( GoodDay (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Succession-boxes at popes

Hello. See here. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For being such a sensible individual!

Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 15:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Carol :) GoodDay (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for reverting useful contributions that improved the project and showing everyone that you arent here to improve Wikipedia. 108.28.162.100 (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]