User talk:Cirt/Archive 24

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

		The Deletion to Quality Award
		For your contributions to bring The Signpost (Wikipedia) (prior candidate for deletion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Signpost (Wikipedia)) to Good Article status, I hereby present you The Deletion to Quality Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Esquivalience t 01:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you ! — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

The article The Signpost (Wikipedia) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Signpost (Wikipedia) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esquivalience -- Esquivalience (talk) 02:01, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much ! — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations! It's always nice to see articles from RfD to GA or even FA. ツ FrB.TG (talk) 08:03, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, FrB.TG (talk · contribs), I do so very much enjoy taking articles from WP:AFD to both WP:GA and WP:FA, and it's a most satisfying accomplishment to increase their quality in this manner. — Cirt (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the women's football/soccer task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmlarson (talk • contribs) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your appreciation, Hmlarson, I've currently embarked on a Quality improvement effort to try to improve the article Jenna Fife, which I first noticed during its deletion debate. — Cirt (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

In the future, please avoid performing unilateral page moves without engaging in discussion.

Please enlist feedback from our Wikipedia community via our WP:REQMOVE standard procedures.

Especially if you realize -- by the 2nd time -- that it is possible the page move could fall under potentially controversial moves.

Thank you for reading above,

— Cirt (talk) 20:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The page you link to says this: "If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page." If I had expected a dispute I would have discussed the matter. My recent moves seems uncontroversial. The principal meaning of the word "giraffe" is a certain animal with a long neck, and if there's also an organization called "Giraffe", one would expect the article title Giraffe to be about the animal and Giraffe (organization) to be about the organization. To have an article titled Giraffe (animal) would be unreasonable, to say the least. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps the first time. But the second (2nd) time, you should have sought out discussion through the Wikipedia community. In the future, please do not communicate solely by edit summaries during your reverting process. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

DIFF1 = 1 April 2016, and then again, with zero discussion the second time, in violation of WP:REQMOVE and WP:BRD at DIFF2 = 10 April 2016. — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Moveable Feast (organization) to be moved to Moveable Feast. Interested members of the Wikipedia community may want to participate in the discussion here.

— Cirt (talk) 20:29, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

• Note: Please see my comment at DIFF. — Cirt (talk) 20:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your edit [[1]] edited my comments. This is explicitly NOT ALLOWED. 99.249.130.248 (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Please read WP:REFACTOR. Cirt fixed your broken copy-and-pasted templates in the edit, which falls into the Fixing technical matters of wikitext formatting, tables, templates, broken links, and the like category. Zhaofeng Li ^talk (Please {{Ping}} when replying) 11:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

IP was blocked two weeks. — Cirt (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Cirt. There's an open AfD concerning Butterfly vibrator. I noticed that, in opposing a merge, you mentioned that there's significant coverage of the topic. I tried my best, but I couldn't find anything besides sales websites and the most incidental of mentions—nothing covering butterfly vibrators qua butterfly vibrators. Perhaps you can find something?  Rebbing  04:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi you had deleted NYLA HASAN but there are many good and reliable new links for her

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nyla_Hasan&action=edit&redlink=1

Please see the news links: http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/2988345-mother-of-three-surprised-to-be-crowned-mrs-pakistan-world/ http://tribune.com.pk/story/132516/mrs-pakistan-world-forever-young/#comment-166753 http://www.fashioncentral.pk/people-parties/events/celebrations/story-565-nyla-hasan-wins-mrs-yummy-mummy-2011/

Please can you revert the page,. Thank you --MinkyThePet (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I've created a new article on the satirical comedy short film Climate Change Denial Disorder.

Help with additional research would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial Disorder.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

I have nominated the Anthony Anderson (basketball) article to possibly have it be promoted to a featured article. Could you please leave some comments on areas that you would want to fix so that it meets the FA criteria? If so, add your opinion on the article on the nomination page. TempleM (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lie-to-children you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 21:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much, Markworthen, let me know what else I can do. — Cirt (talk) 02:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Cirt:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Cirt. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The Signpost at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Miniapolis 20:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Lie-to-children you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lie-to-children for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Markworthen -- Markworthen (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)