Jump to content

Collateral source rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darquis (talk | contribs) at 07:49, 25 July 2017 (Unsourced, reads as opinion/argument in favor of law rather than an explanation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The collateral source rule, or collateral source doctrine, is an American case law evidentiary rule that prohibits the admission of evidence that the plaintiff or victim has received compensation from some source other than the damages sought against the defendant. For example, in a personal injury action, evidence that the Plaintiff's medical bills were paid by medical insurance, or by Workers' Compensation, is not generally admissible.[1]

The collateral source doctrine has come under attack by "tort reform" advocates. They argue that if the Plaintiff's injuries and damages have already been compensated, it is unfair and duplicative to allow an award of damages against the tortfeasor. As a result numerous states have altered or partially abrogated the rule by statute.[2]


References

  1. ^ "Workers' Compensation". WCS. Retrieved 2011-10-17.
  2. ^ "Collateral source rule reform". NAMIC. Retrieved 2008-02-07.