Talk:Critical Role

Dungeons & Dragons C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. D&D to-do: edit history watch purge view Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Merge : Various articles Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More... Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons) Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Dthomsen8, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on November 2015. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: awaiting deletion decision

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.destructoid.com/inside-critical-role-the-live-d-d-show-led-by-voices-you-might-recognize-342464.phtml

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... there's no wikipedia page yet for this greatest streaming D&D show

Hey, that contested deletion was a pretty weak claim, whoever wrote it. But yes, Critical Role is credible and significant. Article's messy right now, but that's beside the point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.77.151.201 (talk) 11:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. Someone fix that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.77.151.201 (talk) 09:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for put forth for speedy deletion are nebulous at best. There is a significant community that supports Critical Role, and several wikia pages, as well as fan sites that abound. All that is needed is some cleaning in format and it would be fine. 75.213.130.74 (talk) 15:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC) KennefRiggles[reply]

With all the disambiguation pages for phrases, pronouns, acronyms or initialisms, terminology, and so forth, difficulty in finding this article is going to be as per normal for Wikipedia, but that concern is noted.--64.134.222.18 (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Jason T. Reimche[reply]

Seeing as Critical Role has helped the Geek&Sundry community raise almost $300,000 in the passed seven months as of the day of this postfor charities, I believe the page should not be deleted because this page has not had sufficient time to reach its potential and should be allowed to remain on the website. They are an amazing group of people who entertain thousands of people every week. At around 3:38:00 in episode 30 of Critical Role, Overlord Zach presents the amount of money contributed by Geek&Sundry to charity. I don't know how to cite that properly. If someone could do that for me i would appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFellowCritter (talk • contribs) 18:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It may be more productive at this time to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Role than here. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 19:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on creating this page for a while, and finally feel it is ready to go live. A previous WP entry for the show was the subject of an AfD discussion. The article was eventually deleted, but with encouragement to resubmit when more mainstream coverage was available. I have drastically revised the page, added the "(web series)" modifier to the title to resolve the name commonality concern, and added a number of additional media references. I am happy to hear all feedback, as I am a new editor and really want to do this properly. Gamma Liz (talk) 21:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should the upcoming sourcebooks by Green Ronin Publishing be mentioned in the article? -- 84 (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly? I don't see a reason to include anything under a physical product is available. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:31, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent comment made by Matt Mercer, the one-shot that began the game was actually using 4th edition rules, only getting converted to pathfinder after players expressed interest in continuing. Not sure how that would best be altered, but it should probably be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.230.115 (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

incorrect. they started with pathfinder and then converted to 5e once the show began. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.64.164 (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, they're right. They played 4th E for the one off, then swapped to Pathfinder for the continuing campaign. Darquis (talk) 06:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]