Jump to content

Talk:Axle track

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Title of this page

I think this page should perhaps be called "Track (automotive)", as in the automotive field it is not referred to as "axle track" but simply "track". The only reason I have initally gone with "Axle track" is that was the term used on the Track disambiguation page. Thoughts? Erelyes (talk) 07:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea - I will reply on your talk page. Trafford09 (talk) 08:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I dont really agree to the 'automotive' move. All vehicles, be they cars, trucks, buses, three wheeled motorbikes, tuk-tuks, mobility scooters, etc, etc, - will have an axle, and therefore an axle track! 78.32.143.113 (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Only vehicles with two wheels on the same axles can have a track, that would include tricycles, other two axle three wheeled vehicles and single axle trailers but exclude bicycles . The article Track (automobile) already exists. The merged article should perhaps be called Track (vehicle). All vehcles with at least two axles have a wheelbase. So single axle trailers do not have a wheelbase. Peter Horn User talk 22:50, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The title is OK as is. Peter Horn User talk 23:30, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
With hindsight, I think that 'axle track' is better than 'track (automotive)'. Not all wheeled objects are automotive - e.g. push-trolleys at supermarkets - but they still have axles and hence axle track(s).
Therefore, I now think that the article's title should remain 'axle track' as it is now. Trafford09 (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah - I now see that the proposed merge is to a very similar article. The argument for merging seems good. However, it's a shame that my example of a supermarket trolley is also probably not a 'vehicle' as such. Could one think of a noun which comprises vehicles and push-trolleys .... or am I being inadvertently petty? What about calling the merged article "Track (axle)" (or indeed "Axle track" as this one's now called)? Trafford09 (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It would apply to shopping carts, wagons, dollies, any vehicle that has either two or more wheels on an axle or a wheel on each side of the vehicle without the wheels being on the same axle. Any vehicle that either has two or more axles, one after the other, also has a wheelbase. I would sugest Track (vehicle axle) Peter Horn User talk 01:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To make things more interesting there is also an article called Tracked vehicle Peter Horn User talk 01:25, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not to "forget" continuous track and by the way, shopping carts, etc. have casters rather than wheels. Peter Horn User talk 23:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wheel track might be more appropriate. Peter Horn User talk 02:55, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Axle track#Rail

@MSGJ:
The section Axle track#Rail merits the {{rail-stub}}
Peter Horn User talk 22:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]