Talk:Cuteness: Difference between revisions

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about what you think is cute. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about what you think is cute at the Reference desk.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Philosophy: Aesthetics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: Dale, Joshua Paul, ed. (2016). The aesthetics and affects of cuteness. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-1-138-99875-9.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the section about Caretaking please replace: "Melanie Glocker argued in 2009 that the cuteness that an infant embodies can motivate the type of care one takes while caring for the infant". with: "Melanie Glocker argued in 2009 that cuteness of an infant motivates caretaking in unrelated adults"

It seems strange that this article ignore the self-evident fact that 'cute' adults often elicit a caregiver response, and that makeup and dress may be used by adults to emphasise such traits.

It did not include a guided image of my friend Charlotte. 2601:246:5B7F:20D0:10A0:D635:5352:A92A (talk) 18:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]