Jump to content

SAT: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 82.17.118.121 (talk) to last version by ElKevbo
Line 265: Line 265:


===1994 changes===
===1994 changes===
In [[1994]] the verbal shit section received a dramatic change in focus. Among these changes were the removal of [[antonym]] questions, and an increased focus on passage damn reading. The mathematics section also saw a dramatic bitch. The mathematics section introduced concepts of probability and bastards, slope, elementary motherfuckers, counting problems, median and mode.<ref name=CBHistorical />
In [[1994]] the verbal section received a dramatic change in focus. Among these changes were the removal of [[antonym]] questions, and an increased focus on passage reading. The mathematics section also saw a dramatic . The mathematics section introduced concepts of probability, slope, elementary , counting problems, median and mode.<ref name=CBHistorical />


The average score on the 1994 modification was 10 out of 50 and it was a shit score and then my my mam called me a pusssy of the SAT I was usually around 1000 (500 on the verbal piece of shit, 500 on the math). The most selective schools in the United States what are extremely gay (for example, those in the [[Ivy League]]) typically had big paginas SAT averages exceeding 1400 on the old test.
The average score on the 1994 modification of the SAT I was usually around 1000 (500 on the verbal, 500 on the math). The most selective schools in the United States (for example, those in the [[Ivy League]]) typically had SAT averages exceeding 1400 on the old test.


===2002 changes - "score choice"===
===2002 changes - "score choice"===
Line 278: Line 278:
The College Board considers re-starting the "score choice" which was dropped in 2002.
The College Board considers re-starting the "score choice" which was dropped in 2002.


==Name changes and recentered scores==
This letter notifies institutions of changes to the definition of fundability status that we intend to introduce in our Higher Education Students Early Statistics (HESES) and Higher Education in Further Education: Students (HEIFES) surveys for 2008-09. These changes arise from the implementation of the Government's policy on the funding of students aiming for equivalent or lower qualifications (ELQs) compared with those they already hold.
In 1990, because of uncertainty about the SAT's ability to function as an [[intelligence test]], the name was changed to Scholastic Assessment Test. Finally, in 1994, the name was changed to simply SAT (with the [[Pseudo-acronym|letters not standing for anything]]). Now the test is commonly referred to as the SAT Reasoning Test. The scoring categories are now the following: Reading, Math, Writing, and Essay. The essay has its own score now.


The test scoring was initially scaled to make 500 the mean score on each section with a [[standard deviation]] of 100.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761570026_3/intelligence.html |title=Intelligence |publisher=[[MSN Encarta]] |accessdate=2008-03-02}}</ref> As the test grew more popular and more students from less rigorous schools began taking the test, the average dropped to about 428 Verbal and 478 Math. The SAT was "recentered" in 1995, and the average "new" score became again close to 500. Scores awarded after 1994 and before October 2001 are officially reported with an "R" (e.g. 1260R) to reflect this change. Old scores may be recentered to compare to 1995 to present scores by using official College Board tables<ref>[http://professionals.collegeboard.com/data-reports-research/sat/equivalence-tables/sat-score SAT I Individual Score Equivalents<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
2. HEFCE 2007/27, 'Withdrawal of funding for equivalent or lower qualifications', consulted on implementation of the Government's policy towards the funding of students aiming for ELQs. A report on the outcomes of the consultation is being published separately as HEFCE 2008/13. Our provisional recurrent grant allocations for 2008-09 (summarised in HEFCE 2008/12) incorporated adjustments to funding for 2008-09 as a result of those decisions.
, which in the middle ranges add about 70 points to Verbal and 20 or 30 points to Math. In other words, current students have a 100 (70 plus 30) point advantage over their parents.

3. In Annex B of HEFCE 2007/27 we explained that, for the purposes of adjusting funding in 2008-09, we were treating a potentially larger population of students as being exempt from the ELQ policy than might finally be reflected in the longer term through our revised definition of fundability status in the HESES and HEIFES surveys. Further information about this was provided in the individual recurrent grant letters to institutions of 3 March 2008. This approach has been necessary to reflect the coverage and limits of the 2005-06 data which have been used to inform the funding adjustments, ensuring that we take a broad, inclusive view of areas to be exempt for the purposes of adjusting funding, while providing a robust definition of fundability status for the future.

4. Annex A to this letter provides the revised definition of HEFCE-fundable status that we intend to adopt for HESES, while Annex B provides the equivalent definition for HEIFES. In both cases, these are shown as tracked changes (see note) to paragraphs 1 to 5 of Annex G of the 2007 version of each publication (HEFCE 2007/26 and HEFCE 2007/25 respectively). In identifying those areas which are exempt from the ELQ policy, we have avoided using the subject codes that institutions use in completing their individualised student data returns (the Joint Academic Coding System, JACS, used by higher education institutions in their individualised student record for the Higher Education Statistics Agency; and the learndirect codes used by further education colleges in their individualised learner record for the Learning and Skills Council). Given that institutions have some flexibility in how they use these subject codes, we do not believe they are sufficiently robust for use in determining the fundability status of students.

5. Paragraphs 6 to 25 of Annex G of HESES07 and HEIFES07 will also be retained in HESES08 and HEIFES08 respectively, subject to any revisions that we consider appropriate. They have not been included in the Annexes to this document, because the changes arising from the ELQ policy do not have an immediate bearing on them. However, institutions should note that, because of the changes to our teaching funding method introduced from 2008-09, neither the former premiums, nor the targeted allocations that replace them, will be included in the standard resource calculations used in determining how many Home and EC students should be reported as non-fundable (if funding is provided from another EC public source), or can be reported as independently funded (if funding is provided from a source other than an EC public one). The calculations will continue to take account of London weighting.

6. We do not require a response to this letter. However, if institutions have questions about the wording in Annexes A or B of this letter, they should send them to heses@hefce.ac.uk (for higher education institutions) or heifes@hefce.ac.uk (for further education colleges). The definitions of fundability status will be confirmed in the HESES and HEIFES publications in September 2008.

Yours sincerely

Professor David Eastwood
Chief Executive


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download
Annex A
[ MS Word 144K | Zipped Word 24K ]

Annex B
[ MS Word 130K | Zipped Word 20K ]


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note
Please ensure you view the annexes in 'Final Showing Markup'.

[ Home | Site index | Contacts | Vacancies | Tenders | Disclaimer | Copyright ]
HEFCE, Northavon House, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QD, Tel 0117 931 7317, Fax 0117 931 7203, E-mail hefce@hefce.ac.uk Widening access and improving participation in higher education are a crucial part of our mission and form one of our strategic aims. Our aim is to promote and provide the opportunity of successful participation in higher education to everyone who can benefit from it. This is vital for social justice and economic competitiveness.

Widening participation addresses the large discrepancies in the take-up of higher education opportunities between different social groups. Under-representation is closely connected with broader issues of equity and social inclusion, so we are concerned with ensuring equality of opportunity for disabled students, mature students, women and men, and all ethnic groups.

We will work with others to raise aspirations and educational attainment among people from under-represented communities to prepare them for higher education, ensure success on their programme of study, improve their employment prospects and open possibilities for postgraduate study, and give them opportunities to return to learning throughout their lives.

Summary of priorities for 2006-11 as set out in our strategic plan.

We recently undertook a review of widening participation activities in the sector which we reported to the Minister of State for Higher Education and Lifelong Learning. Further information is available.

Enquiries for or about the Widening Participation Team should initially be addressed to Carmen Brown, tel 0117 931 7215, e-mail c.brown@hefce.ac.uk. Alternatively, higher education institutions may contact their HEFCE higher education adviser.

A-Z of widening participation topics

Last updated 25 June 2008

[ Home | Site index | Contacts | Vacancies | Tenders | Disclaimer | Copyright ]
HEFCE, Northavon House, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QD, Tel 0117 931 7317, Fax 0117 931 7203, E-mail hefce@hefce.ac.uk


==Scoring problems of October 2005 tests==
==Scoring problems of October 2005 tests==

Revision as of 17:55, 7 July 2008

The SAT Reasoning Test (formerly Scholastic Aptitude Test and Scholastic Assessment Test) is a standardized test for college admissions in the United States. The SAT is owned, published, and developed by the College Board, a non-profit organization in the United States, and was once developed, published, and scored by the Educational Testing Service (ETS).[1] ETS now administers the exam.

The current SAT Reasoning Test is administered in about four hours and costs $45 ($71 International), excluding late fees.[2] Since the SAT's introduction in 1901, its name and scoring has changed several times. In 2005, the test was renamed as "SAT Reasoning Test" with possible scores from 600 to 2400 combining test results from three 800-point sections (math, critical reading, and writing), along with other subsections scored separately.[1]

Function

The College Board states that the SAT measures critical thinking skills that are needed for academic success in college. They state that the SAT assesses how well the test takers analyze and solve problems—skills they learned in school that they will need in college. The SAT is typically taken by high school juniors and seniors.[3] Specifically, the College Board states that use of the SAT in combination with high school grade point average (GPA) provides a better indicator of success in college than high school grades alone, as measured by college freshman GPA. Various studies conducted over the lifetime of the SAT show a statistically significant increase in correlation of high school grades and freshman grades when the SAT is factored in.[4]

There are substantial differences in funding, curricula, grading, and difficulty among U.S. secondary schools due to American federalism, local control, and the prevalence of private, distance, and home schooled students. ACT/SAT scores are intended to supplement the secondary school record and help admission officers put local data—such as course work, grades, and class rank—in a national perspective.[5]

Historically, the SAT has been more popular among colleges in the coasts and the ACT more popular in the Midwest and South. There are some colleges that require the ACT to be taken for college course placement, and a few schools that do not accept the SAT at all. [6]

Structure

SAT consists of three major sections: Critical Reading, Mathematics, and Writing. Each section receives a score on the scale of 200–800. All scores are multiples of 10. Total scores are calculated by adding up scores of the three sections. Each major section is divided into three parts. There are 10 sub-sections, including an additional 25-minute experimental or "equating" section that may be in any of the three major sections. The experimental section is used to normalize questions for future administrations of the SAT and does not count toward the final score. The test contains 3 hours and 45 minutes of actual timed sections,[7] although most administrations, including orientation, distribution of materials, and completion of the biographical sections, run about 4 hours (10–25 minutes per sub-section) long.

Intentionally blank page in the style used in the SAT.

Critical Reading

The Critical Reading, formerly verbal, section of the SAT is made up of three scored sections, two 25-minute sections and one 20-minute section, with varying types of questions, including sentence completions and questions about short and long reading passages. Critical Reading sections normally begin with 5 to 8 sentence completion questions; the remainder of the questions are focused on the reading passages. Sentence completions generally test the student's vocabulary and understanding of sentence structure and organization by requiring the student to select one or two words that best complete a given sentence. The bulk of the Critical Reading questions is made up of questions regarding reading passages, in which students read short excerpts on social sciences, humanities, physical sciences, or personal narratives and answer questions based on the passage. Certain sections contain passages asking the student to compare two related passages; generally, these consist of short reading passages as well as longer passages. Since this is a timed test, the number of questions about each passage is proportional to the length of the passage.

Mathematics

The Mathematics section of SAT is widely known as Quantitative Section. Mathematics section consists of three scored sections. There are two 25-minute sections and one 20-minute section, as follows:

  • One of the 25-minute sections is entirely multiple choice, with 20 questions.
  • The other 25-minute section contains eight multiple choice questions and 10 grid-in questions.
  • The shorter section is all multiple choice, with only 16 questions.

Notably, the SAT has done away with quantitative comparison questions on the math section, leaving only questions with straightforward symbolic or numerical answers. Since the quantitative comparison questions were well-known for their deceptive nature—often turning on the student's recognition of a single exception to a rule or pattern—this choice has been equated to a philosophical shift away from "trickery" and toward "straight math" on the SAT. Also, many test experts have attributed this change, like the addition of the new writing section, to an attempt to make the SAT more like the ACT. Indeed, there is a correlation between ACT scores and SAT scores.[8][9]

Writing

The writing section of the SAT, based on but not directly comparable to the old SAT II subject test in writing, includes multiple choice questions and a brief essay. The multiple choice questions include error identification questions, sentence improvement questions, and paragraph improvement questions. Error identification and sentence improvement questions test the student's knowledge of grammar, presenting an awkward or grammatically incorrect sentence; in the error identification section, the student must locate the word producing the source of the error or indicate that the sentence has no error, while the sentence improvement section requires the student to select an acceptable fix to the awkward sentence. The paragraph improvement questions test the student's understanding of logical organization of ideas, presenting a poorly written student essay and asking a series of questions as to what changes might be made to best improve it.

The essay section, which is always administered as the first section of the test, is 25 minutes long. All essays must be in response to a given prompt. The prompts are broad and often philosophical and are designed to be accessible to students regardless of their educational and social backgrounds. For instance, test takers may be asked to expound on such ideas as their opinion on the value of work in human life or whether technological change also carries negative consequences to those who benefit from it. No particular essay structure is required, and the College Board accepts examples "taken from [the student's] reading, studies, experience, or observations." Two trained readers assign each essay a score between 1 and 6, where a score of 0 is reserved for essays that are blank, off-topic, non-English, not written with a Number 2 pencil, or considered illegible after several attempts at reading. The scores are summed to produce a final score from 2 to 12 (or 0). If the two readers' scores differ by more than one point, then a senior third reader decides. The essay score accounts for roughly 30% of the writing score; the multiple choice component accounts for roughly 70%.

Questions

Most of the questions on the SAT are multiple choice; all multiple-choice questions have five answer choices, one of which is correct. The questions of each section of the same type are generally ordered by difficulty. However, an important exception exists: Questions that follow the long and short reading passages are organized chronologically, rather than by difficulty. Ten of the questions in one of the math sub-sections are not multiple choice. They instead require the test taker to bubble in a number in a four-column grid.

The questions are weighted equally. For each correct answer, one raw point is added. For each incorrect answer one-fourth of a point is deducted. No points are deducted for incorrect math grid-in questions. This ensures that a student's mathematically expected gain from guessing is zero. The final score is derived from the raw score; the precise conversion chart varies between test administrations.

The SAT therefore recommends only making educated guesses, that is, when the test taker can eliminate at least one answer he or she thinks is wrong. Without eliminating any answers one's probability of answering correctly is 20%. Eliminating one wrong answer increases this probability to 25%; two, a 33.3% probability; three, a 50% probability of choosing the correct answer and thus earning the full point for the question.

Section Average Score Time (Minutes) Content
Writing 497 60 Grammar, usage, and word choice
Mathematics 518 70 Number and operations; algebra and functions; geometry; statistics, probability, and data analysis
Critical Reading 503 70 Critical reading and sentence-level reading

Taking the test

The SAT is offered seven times a year in the United States, in October, November, December, January, March (or April, alternating), May, and June. The test is typically offered on the first Saturday of the month for the November, December, May, and June administrations. In other countries, the SAT is offered on the same dates as in the United States except for the first spring test date (i.e., March or April), which is not offered. In 2006, the test was taken 1,465,744 times.[10]

Candidates may either take the SAT Reasoning Test or up to three SAT Subject Tests on any given test date, except the first spring test date, when only the SAT Reasoning Test is offered. Candidates wishing to take the test may register online at the College Board's website, by mail, or by telephone, at least three weeks before the test date.

The SAT Subject Tests are all given in one large book on test day. Therefore, it is actually immaterial which tests, and how many, the student signs up for; with the possible exception of the language tests with listening, the student may change his or her mind and take any tests, regardless of his or her initial sign-ups. Students who choose to take more subject tests than they signed up for will later be billed by College Board for the additional tests and their scores will be withheld until the bill is paid. Students who choose to take fewer subject tests than they signed up for are not eligible for a refund.

The SAT Reasoning Test costs $45 ($71 International). For the Subject tests, students pay a $20 Basic Registration Fee and $9 per test (except for language tests with listening, which cost $20 each).[2] The College Board makes fee waivers available for low income students. Additional fees apply for late registration, standby testing, registration changes, scores by telephone, and extra score reports (beyond the four provided for free).

Candidates whose religious beliefs prevent them from taking the test on a Saturday may request to take the test on the following Sunday, except for the October test date in which the Sunday test date is eight days after the main test offering. Such requests must be made at the time of registration and are subject to denial.

Students with verifiable disabilities, including physical and learning disabilities, are eligible to take the SAT with accommodations. The standard time increase for students requiring additional time due to learning disabilities is 50%.

Raw scores, scaled scores, and percentiles

Students receive their online score report approximately three weeks after administration of the test (six weeks for mailed, paper scores), with each section graded on a scale of 200–800 and two sub scores for the writing section: the essay score and the multiple choice sub score. In addition to their score, students receive their percentile (the percentage of other test takers with lower scores). The raw score, or the number of points gained from correct answers and lost from incorrect answers (ranges from just under 50 to just under 60, depending upon the test), is also included.[11] Students may also receive, for an additional fee, the Question and Answer Service, which provides the student's answer, the correct answer to each question, and online resources explaining each question.

The corresponding percentile of each scaled score varies from test to test—for example, in 2003, a scaled score of 800 in both sections of the SAT Reasoning Test corresponded to a percentile of 99.9, while a scaled score of 800 in the SAT Physics Test corresponded to the 94th percentile. The differences in what scores mean with regard to percentiles are because of the content of the exam and the caliber of students choosing to take each exam. Subject Tests are subject to intensive study (often in the form of an AP, which is relatively more difficult), and only those who know they will perform well tend to take these tests, creating a skewed distribution of scores.

The percentiles that various SAT scores for college-bound seniors correspond to are summarized in the following chart:[12][10]

Percentile Score, 1600 Scale
(official, 2006)
Score, 2400 Scale
(official, 2006)
99.93/99.98* 1600 2400
99+ ≥1550 ≥2300
99 ≥1480 ≥2200
98 ≥1450 ≥2140
97 ≥1420 ≥2100
88 ≥1380 ≥1900
83 ≥1280 ≥1800
78 ≥1200 ≥1770
72 ≥1150 ≥1700
61 ≥1090 ≥1600
48 ≥1010 ≥1500
36 ≥950 ≥1400
15 ≥810 ≥1200
4 ≥670 ≥1010
1 ≥520 ≥790
* The percentile of the perfect score was 99.98 on the 2400 scale and 99.93 on the 1600 scale.

The older SAT (before 1995) had a very high ceiling. In any given year, only seven of the million test-takers scored above 1580. A score above 1580 was equivalent to the 99.9995 percentile.[13]

SAT-ACT score comparisons

Map of states according to preferred exam of 2006 high school graduates. States in orange had more students taking the SAT than the ACT.

Although there is no official conversion chart between the SAT and its biggest rival, the ACT, the College Board released an unofficial chart based on results from 103,525 test takers who took both tests between October 1994 and December 1996 here; however, both tests have changed since then. Several colleges have also issued their own charts. The following is based on the University of California's conversion chart.[14]

SAT (Prior to Writing Test Addition) SAT (With Writing Test Addition) ACT Composite Score
1600 2400 36
1560-1590 2340-2390 35
1520-1550 2280-2330 34
1480-1510 2220-2270 33
1440-1470 2160-2210 32
1400-1430 2100-2150 31
1360-1390 2040-2090 30
1320-1350 1980-2030 29
1280-1310 1920-1970 28
1240-1270 1860-1910 27
1200-1230 1800-1850 26
1160-1190 1740-1790 25
1120-1150 1680-1730 24
1080-1110 1620-1670 23
1040-1070 1560-1610 22
1000-1030 1500-1550 21
960-990 1440-1490 20
920-950 1380-1430 19
880-910 1320-1370 18
840-870 1260-1310 17
800-830 1200-1250 16
760-790 1140-1190 15
720-750 1080-1130 14
680-710 1020-1070 13
640-670 960-1010 12
600-630 900-950 11

Historical development

Mean SAT Scores by year[15]
Year of
exam
Reading
/Verbal
Score
Math
Score
1972 530 509
1973 523 506
1974 521 505
1975 512 498
1976 509 497
1977 507 496
1978 507 494
1979 505 493
1980 502 492
1981 502 492
1982 504 493
1983 503 494
1984 504 497
1985 509 500
1986 509 500
1987 507 501
1988 505 501
1989 504 502
1990 500 501
1991 499 500
1992 500 501
1993 500 503
1994 499 504
1995 504 506
1996 505 508
1997 505 511
1998 505 512
1999 505 511
2000 505 514
2001 506 514
2002 504 516
2003 507 519
2004 508 518
2005 508 520
2006 503 518

Originally used mainly by colleges and universities in the north-eastern United States, and developed by Carl Brigham, one of the psychologists who worked on the Army Alpha and Beta tests, the SAT was originally developed as a way to eliminate test bias between people from different socio-economic backgrounds.

1901 test

The College Board began on June 17, 1901, when 973 students took its first test, across 67 locations in the United States, and two in Europe. Although those taking the test came from a variety of backgrounds, approximately one third were from New York, New Jersey, or Pennsylvania. The majority of those taking the test were from private schools, academies, or endowed schools. About 60% of those taking the test applied to Columbia University. The test contained sections on English, French, German, Latin, Greek, history, mathematics, chemistry, and physics. The test was not multiple choice, but instead was evaluated based on essay responses as "excellent," "good," "doubtful," "poor," or "very poor." [16]

1926 test

The first administration of the SAT occurred on June 23, 1926, when it was known as the Scholastic Aptitude Test.[17][18] This test, prepared by a committee headed by Princeton psychologist Carl Campbell Brigham, had sections of definitions, arithmetic, classification, artificial language, antonyms, number series, analogies, logical inference, and paragraph reading. It was administered to over 8,000 students at over 300 test centers. Men composed 60% of the test-takers. Slightly over a quarter of males and females applied to Yale University and Smith College respectively. [18] The test was paced considerably quickly, with 315 questions asked in only a little over an hour and a half.[17]

1928 and 1929 tests

In 1928 the number of verbal sections was reduced to 7, and the time limit was increased to slightly under two hours. In 1929 the number of sections was again reduced, this time to 6. These changes in part loosened time constraints on test-takers. Math was eliminated entirely for these tests, instead focusing only on verbal ability.[17]

1930 test and 1936 changes

In 1930 the SAT was first split into the verbal and math sections, a structure that would continue through 2004. The verbal section of the 1930 test covered a more narrow range on content than its predecessors, examining only antonyms, double definitions (somewhat similar to sentence completions), and paragraph reading. In 1936, analogies were re-added. Between 1936 and 1946, students had between 80 and 115 minutes to answer 250 verbal questions (over a third of which were on antonyms). The mathematics test introduced in 1930 contained 100 free response questions to be answered in 80 minutes, and focused primarily on speed. From 1936 to 1941, like the 1928 and 1929 tests, the mathematics section was eliminated entirely. When the mathematics portion of the test was re-added in 1942, it consisted of multiple choice questions.[17]

1946 test and associated changes

Paragraph reading was eliminated from the verbal portion of the SAT in 1946, and replaced with reading comprehension, and "double definition" questions were replaced with sentence completions. Between 1946 and 1957 students were given 90 to 100 minutes to complete 107 to 170 verbal questions. Starting in 1958 time limits became more stable, and for 17 years, until 1975, students had 75 minutes to answer 90 questions. In 1959 questions on data sufficiency were introduced to the mathematics section, and then replaced with quantitative comparisons in 1974. In 1974 both verbal and math sections were reduced from 75 minutes to 60 minutes each, with changes in test composition compensating for the decreased time.[17]

1980 test and associated changes

The inclusion of the "Strivers" Score study was implemented. This study was introduced by The Educational Testing Service, which administers the SAT, and has been conducting research on how to make it easier for minorities and individuals who suffer from social and economic barriers. The original "Strivers" project, which was in the research phase from 1980 - 1994, awarded a test-taker who was identified as a minority an additional 10 - 200 points, depending on the race and gender. The belief was that this would give minorities a better chance at being accepted in to a college of higher standard, i.e. an Ivy League school. In 1992, the Strivers Project was leaked to the public; as a result the Strivers Project was terminated in 1993. After Federal Courts heard arguments from the ACLU, NAACP and the Educational Testing Service, the courts ordered the study to alter its data collection process, stating that only the age, race and zip code could be used to determine the test-takers eligibility for "Strivers" points. These changes were introduced to the SAT effective in 1994.

1994 changes

In 1994 the verbal section received a dramatic change in focus. Among these changes were the removal of antonym questions, and an increased focus on passage reading. The mathematics section also saw a dramatic change in 1994, thanks in part to pressure from the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. For the first time since 1935, the SAT asked some non-multiple choice questions, instead requiring students to supply the answers. 1994 also saw the introduction of calculators into the mathematics section for the first time in the test's history. The mathematics section introduced concepts of probability, slope, elementary statistics, counting problems, median and mode.[17]

The average score on the 1994 modification of the SAT I was usually around 1000 (500 on the verbal, 500 on the math). The most selective schools in the United States (for example, those in the Ivy League) typically had SAT averages exceeding 1400 on the old test.

2002 changes - "score choice"

In October 2002, the College Board decided to drop the "score choice" option for exams. They figured that it benefited wealthier students taking the exam who could afford to take it multiple times. Score choice means that scores are not released to colleges until the student approves the score (after seeing it). [19]

2005 changes

In 2005, the test was changed again, largely in response to criticism by the University of California system.[20] Because of issues concerning ambiguous questions, especially analogies, certain types of questions were eliminated (the analogies from the verbal and quantitative comparisons from the Math section). The test was made marginally harder, as a corrective to the rising number of perfect scores. A new writing section, with an essay, based on the former SAT II Writing Subject Test, was added, in part to increase the chances of closing the opening gap between the highest and midrange scores. Other factors included the desire to test the writing ability of each student in a personal manner; hence the essay. The New SAT (known as the SAT Reasoning Test) was first offered on March 12, 2005, after the last administration of the "old" SAT in January of 2005. The Mathematics section was expanded to cover three years of high school mathematics. The Verbal section's name was changed to the Critical reading section.

2008 changes

The College Board considers re-starting the "score choice" which was dropped in 2002.

Name changes and recentered scores

In 1990, because of uncertainty about the SAT's ability to function as an intelligence test, the name was changed to Scholastic Assessment Test. Finally, in 1994, the name was changed to simply SAT (with the letters not standing for anything). Now the test is commonly referred to as the SAT Reasoning Test. The scoring categories are now the following: Reading, Math, Writing, and Essay. The essay has its own score now.

The test scoring was initially scaled to make 500 the mean score on each section with a standard deviation of 100.[21] As the test grew more popular and more students from less rigorous schools began taking the test, the average dropped to about 428 Verbal and 478 Math. The SAT was "recentered" in 1995, and the average "new" score became again close to 500. Scores awarded after 1994 and before October 2001 are officially reported with an "R" (e.g. 1260R) to reflect this change. Old scores may be recentered to compare to 1995 to present scores by using official College Board tables[22] , which in the middle ranges add about 70 points to Verbal and 20 or 30 points to Math. In other words, current students have a 100 (70 plus 30) point advantage over their parents.

Scoring problems of October 2005 tests

In March of 2006, it was announced that a small percentage of the SATs taken in October 2005 had been scored incorrectly due to the test papers being moist and not scanning properly, and that some students had received substantially erroneous scores. The College Board announced they would change the scores for the students who were given a lower score than they earned, but at this point many of those students had already applied to colleges using their original scores. The College Board decided not to change the scores for the students who were given a higher score than they earned. A lawsuit was filed in 2005 by about 4,400 students who received an incorrect low score on the SAT. The class-action suit was settled in August 2007 when The College Board and another company that administers the college-admissions test announced they would pay $2.85 million to over 4,000 students. Under the agreement each student can either elect to receive $275 or submit a claim for more money if he or she feels the damage was even greater.[23]

Criticism

Bias

A famous example of alleged bias in the SAT I is the oarsman-regatta analogy question.[24] The object of the question was to find the pair of terms that have the relationship most similar to the relationship between "runner" and "marathon". The correct answer was "oarsman" and "regatta".

As depicted above, SAT scores vary according to race, income, and parental educational background.

The question relied upon students knowing the meaning of the two terms, referring to a sport popular with the wealthy. Fifty-three percent (53%) of white students correctly answered the question, and 22% of black students did.[25] Analogy questions have since been replaced by short reading passages.

Dropping SAT

A few liberal arts colleges have responded to this criticism by joining the SAT optional movement. These colleges do not require the SAT for admission.

In a 2001 speech to the American Council on Education, Richard C. Atkinson, then president of the University of California, urged dropping the SAT Reasoning Test as a college admissions requirement:

"Anyone involved in education should be concerned about how overemphasis on the SAT is distorting educational priorities and practices, how the test is perceived by many as unfair, and how it can have a devastating impact on the self-esteem and aspirations of young students. There is widespread agreement that overemphasis on the SAT harms American education."[26]

In response to threats by the University of California to drop the SAT as an admission requirement, the College Entrance Examination Board announced the restructuring of the SAT, to take effect in March 2005, as detailed above.

Essay

In 2005, MIT Writing Director Les Perelman plotted essay length versus essay score on the new SAT from released essays and found a high correlation between them. After studying 23 graded essays he found that the longer the essay was, the higher the score. He also discovered that several of these essays were full of factual errors. However, the official SAT guide for scorers state that the essays should be scored according to their quality of writing and not factual accuracy. The National Council of Teachers of English also criticize the 25-minute writing section of the test, arguing that the basic principles of writing encourage the revision of written material several times. They say that the amount of time allowed for the test pushes schools to develop a formulaic system of writing.[27]


See also

References

  1. ^ a b "About the College Board". College Board. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help) Cite error: The named reference "about" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b "SAT Fees: 2008–09 Fees". College Board. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ "Official SAT Reasoning Test page". College Board. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ 01-249.RD.ResNoteRN-10 rv.1
  5. ^ Korbin, L. (2006). SAT Program Handbook. A Comprehensive Guide to the SAT Program for School Counselors and Admissions Officers, 1, 33+. Retrieved January 24, 2006, from College Board Preparation Database.
  6. ^ Preparing for College | College Admissions Help at How to Get into College
  7. ^ "SAT FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions". College Board. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  8. ^ Scatterplots of Harvard ACT and SAT as a crude example
  9. ^ Scatterplots of Berkley ACT and SAT as a crude example
  10. ^ a b The scoring categories are the following, Reading, Math, Writing, and Essay. Cite error: The named reference "SATpercentiles" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  11. ^ My SAT: Help
  12. ^ "SAT Percentile Ranks for Males, Females, and Total Group:2006 College-Bound Seniors—Critical Reading + Mathematics + Writing" (PDF). College Board. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Membership Committee (1999). "1998/99 Membership Committee Report". Prometheus Society. Retrieved 2006-07-26. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. ^ University of California Scholarship Requirement. (URL accessed June 26, 2006).
  15. ^ "National Report: 2006 College-Bound Seniors: Total Group Profile Report" (PDF). 2000. p. 3. Retrieved 2007-03-01. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |Format= ignored (|format= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ "frontline: secrets of the sat: where did the test come from?: the 1901 college board". Secrets of the SAT. Frontline. Retrieved 2007-10-20.
  17. ^ a b c d e f Lawrence, Ida (2002). "Research Report No. 2002-7: A Historical Perspective on the SAT®: 1926–2001" (PDF). College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved 2007-10-20. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ a b "frontline: secrets of the sat: where did the test come from?: the 1926 sat". Secrets of the SAT. Frontline. Retrieved 2007-10-20.
  19. ^ Schoenfeld, Jane. College board drops 'score choice' for SAT-II exams. St. Louis Business Journal, May 24, 2002.
  20. ^ College Board To Alter SAT I for 2005-06 - Daily Nexus
  21. ^ "Intelligence". MSN Encarta. Retrieved 2008-03-02.
  22. ^ SAT I Individual Score Equivalents
  23. ^ Hoover, Eric (2007-08-24). "$2.85-Million Settlement Proposed in Lawsuit Over SAT-Scoring Errors". Retrieved 2007-08-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ Don't Believe the Hype, Chideya, 1995; The Bell Curve, Hernstein and Murray, 1994
  25. ^ Culture And Racism
  26. ^ Achievement Versus Aptitude Tests in College Admissions
  27. ^ The New York Times > Education > On Education: SAT Essay Test Rewards Length and Ignores Errors

Further reading

  • Frey, M.C. and Detterman, D.K. (2003) Scholastic Assessment or g? The Relationship Between the Scholastic Assessment Test and General Cognitive Ability. Psychological Science, 15(6):373–378. PDF
  • Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. W. W. Norton & Company; Rev/Expd edition 1996. ISBN 0-393-31425-1.
  • Gruber, Gary. Gruber's Complete SAT Guide 2008.Pub. Sourcebooks

Gary Gruber

  • Hoffman, Banesh. The Tyranny of Testing. Orig. pub. Collier, 1962. ISBN 0-486-43091-X (and others).
  • Hubin, David R. "The Scholastic Aptitude Test: Its Development and Introduction, 1900-1948" A Ph.D. Disseration in American History at the University of Oregon, 1988. Available for download at http://www.uoregon.edu/~hubin/
  • Hubin, David R. "Bibliography" to The Scholastic Aptitude Test: Its Development and Introduction, 1900-1948. A 63 Page Bibliography to 1988 Ph.D. Disseration with Archival References, Primary Sources, Oral History References. http://www.uoregon.edu/~hubin/BIBLIO.pdf
  • Owen, David. None of the Above: The Truth Behind the SATs. Revised edition. Rowman & Littlefield, 1999. ISBN 0-8476-9507-7.
  • Sacks, Peter. Standardized Minds: The High Price of America's Testing Culture and What We Can Do to Change It. Perseus, 2001. ISBN 0-7382-0433-1.
  • Zwick, Rebecca. Fair Game? The Use of Standardized Admissions Tests in Higher Education. Falmer, 2002. ISBN 0-415-92560-6.