Jump to content

Wikipedia:Deletion policy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by King of Hearts (talk | contribs) at 00:19, 26 January 2006 (not to be confused with). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

 There is currently an ongoing debate over the page deletion process and how it could be improved. See Wikipedia:Deletion reform for a list of discussions, suggestions, and proposals. This page remains policy until a new consensus has developed.

Not to be confused with Wikipedia:Deletion process, the way an article is deleted.

In the normal operations of Wikipedia, over one thousand articles are deleted each day. While it is possible for any user to blank a page, the original content will still be available in the page history for others to view and restore if they wish. When pages are deleted, this removes not only the current version but also all previous versions from view. Only administrators have the ability to delete and undelete pages, and this is limited to those pages that are kept in the archive. Some older deleted pages are completely inaccessible.

Deleted pages can be restored if there is support on Wikipedia:Deletion review or if they've obviously been deleted out of process. See undeletion policy for information on undeletion.

If an article is repeatedly re-created by unassociated editors after being deleted, this may be evidence of a need for an article. Conversely, if an article is repeatedly nominated for deletion, this is not in and of itself evidence that it should be deleted. In some cases, repeated attempts to have an article deleted may even be considered disruptive. If in doubt, don't delete.

Participants in the deletion process are expected to be familiar with the core Wikipedia policies of Verifiability, No Original Research and Neutral Point of View. They should bear in mind what Wikipedia is not.

Procedure for deletion

If a page does not fall into one of the categories listed under Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, then it cannot be deleted without it spending five days on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (or the analogous pages for images and media files, categories, templates, redirects, miscellaneous) first.

What to do with a problem page/image/category

Does the page really belong on AfD? Read the following two tables to find out what to do with a problem page.

Problems that don't require deletion
Problem with page Solution Add this tag
Article written in a foreign language
 List on Wikipedia:Pages needing translation. {{notenglish}}
A stub (but with potential)
 Expand it! {{stub}}, or preferably the topic-specific one from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types
Article resembles a dictionary article
 Modify the introduction removing "refers to", "means", and other such phrases. {{stub}}, or preferably the topic-specific one from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types
Such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article
 Merge the useful content into a more comprehensive article and redirect. {{mergeto|article}}
Article duplicates information in some other article
 Merge and redirect.

If you can't figure out how to perform the merger, tag it and list on Wikipedia:Proposed mergers.

{{merge|article}}.
Article needs improvement
 List on Wikipedia:Cleanup. {{cleanup}}, or preferably a more-specific tag.
Article needs a lot of improvement List on Wikipedia:Pages needing attention. {{attention}}
Article is biased or has lots of POV
 List on Wikipedia:Pages needing attention. {{npov}} or {{POV check}}
Dispute over article content
 List on Wikipedia:Requests for comments. {{disputed}}
Two subjects have the same name
 Make a disambiguation page. {{disambig}}
Can't verify information in article
 Follow the procedure on Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If that doesn't work, come back here. If it is truly unverifiable, it may be deleted.

{{cleanup-verify}}
Inappropriate user page Talk to the user.

If that doesn't work, come back here.

 
Vandalism or inaccuracy
 Revert it.

Mention it on Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress if appropriate.

 
Annoying user Stay cool.

Add user to Wikipedia:Requests for comment if necessary.

 
Any problem with a community-accepted policy or guideline page, including m:instruction creep. Make the proposal on the talk page, seek comment in community discussion areas.
Problems that may require deletion
Problem with page Solution Add this tag
  • Is not suitable for Wikipedia (see WP:NOT)
  • Original research (including the coining of neologisms) - but if it's a source text, it should be moved to Wikisource (see below).
  • Vanity page
  • Advertising or other spam
  • Hoax (not an article about a hoax)
  • Completely idiosyncratic non-topic
 List on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD). See AfD in 3 steps for instructions and tags.

Subject of article fails one of the following consensually accepted guidelines:

List on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD). See AfD in 3 steps for instructions and tags.
List on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (WP:MfD). See WP:MfD for instructions and tags.
Article is possible copyright infringement
 List on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. {{copyvio}} or
{{copyvio|url=source}}
Image is possible copyright infringement List on Wikipedia:Copyright problems. {{imagevio}} or
{{imagevio|url=source}}
Image or other media needs deleting (but not because of copyright violation) List on Wikipedia:Images for deletion. See WP:IfD for instructions and tags.
A useless redirect
 Don't worry; redirects are cheap.

If you must, list on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion but only after reading our recommendations on deleting redirects.

See WP:RfD for instructions and tags.
A category scheme gone awry
 List on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. See WP:CfD for instructions and tags.
A redundant or misguided series box. List on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion. {{tfd}} (Put in the box itself.)
A redundant or misguided stub template or category. List on Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. {{sfd-c}} for stub categories; {{sfd-t}} for stub templates
Can never be other than a dictionary article ("dicdef")
 Turn the article into a redirect (or rename and refactor it) as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (adjectives) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (verbs).

Check that Wiktionary does not already have a dictionary article. If a Wiktionary article does not already exist, transwiki the article to Wiktionary. Afterwards, either replace with a soft redirect or list the article for deletion.

See Wikipedia:Things to be moved to Wiktionary for instructions and tags.
Article is a source text (but not a copyvio)
 Move text to Wikisource and replace it with a stub and a soft redirect.  
Article is a candidate for speedy deletion including:
 List on Wikipedia:Speedy deletions.

In simple cases, just add the {{deletebecause}} tag and the page will automatically be listed in CAT:CSD.

{{db|reason}}

See also: Wikipedia:Template messages#Deletion

Each deletion category has a slightly different procedure. See the page for that category for details. Give the reason why you think it should be deleted. It will remain there for a time, giving other users the chance to comment on whether they think deletion is in fact appropriate. After an appropriate lag time, an administrator will delete the page if a rough consensus is reached - see Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough_consensus.

For candidates for speedy deletion, Administrators do not have to request deletion - they may delete them on sight, though some choose to use Wikipedia:Speedy deletions in some cases.

How to list a page for deletion

Limitations on renomination

In general, if an article has had a deletion discussed and this did not result in a "delete" decision, the article should not be immediately renominated for deletion. Unless there is a good reason for people to change their minds, the second nomination would be identical to the first.

An exception can be made if a discussion has no consensus and a severe lack of contributors. There is no policy or consensus for a hard time limit before an article can be renominated, but some people are likely to state 'keep' for the reason that it was already discussed last week.

Please note that if the result was to transwiki, once the transwiking process is done, the page is a candidate for speedy deletion, and does not need to go through AfD again.

"Listed for deletion" notice

When you follow the proper procedure to list an article for deletion, you place a warning at the top of the article, so that readers of the page know it is being considered for deletion. The warning looks like this:


{{subst:#ifeq:a|b||{{subst:#ifexist:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/{{subst:PAGENAME}}|{{subst:lessthan}}!-- The nomination page for this article already existed when this tag was added. If this was because the article had been nominated for deletion before, and you wish to renominate it, please replace "page={{subst:PAGENAME}}" with "page={{subst:PAGENAME}} (2nd nomination)" below before proceeding with the nomination. -->}}}}This template must be substituted. Replace {{afd with {{subst:afd.

{{subst:lessthan}}!-- Once discussion is closed, please place on talk page:

-->


Hopefully, this notice will prevent readers and new users from becoming confused as to why a page was removed. Please note: copyright problems have a different suggested notice. See also: Wikipedia:Boilerplate_text#Listed_for_deletion and Wikipedia:Example deletion discussion

The notice is not needed for pages which a) have no content (such as redirects), and b) also have no significant history. (E.g. a redirect whose entire history is that it used to redirect from "Foo" to "Foobar", and has been changed to redirect to "FooBar", because the target page was moved, does not have any significant history.) A history which shows any content being added or removed that is not a candidate for speedy deletion is significant history.

If an article has been on AfD before but users want to start another iteration of a deletion debate, they should consider using this template, {{subst:afdx|2nd}}. This creates a link to a new debate page and prevents the old one from being overwritten or re-used.

This template must be substituted. Replace {{afdx{{subst:#ifeq:a|b|{{subst:!}}help={{{help}}}}} with {{subst:afdx{{subst:#ifeq:a|b|{{subst:!}}help={{{help}}}}}.


Lag times

Once a page is listed for deletion by listing on one of the different pages, the nomination is kept open for a period of time to allow for community comment. The different pages have different "lag times" (the length of time that the page should normally be listed before the article can be deleted). This gives other users the chance to comment on whether they think deletion is in fact appropriate. The lag times are currently set at:

Commenting on a listing for deletion

When someone has listed an article for deletion on one of the lists, anyone else may comment on the request. When expressing an opinion, please include your opinion, your reasoning, and sign with ~~~~ (four consecutive tilde characters). The following are some suggested wordings. There is a list of these and other commonly used shorthands at the Wikipedia:Guide to deletion.

  • delete
  • keep
  • comment
  • other (some other action) such as
    • redirect to [[article]]
    • merge into [[article]] and redirect
    • move to Wiktionary / Meta / other GFDL site

Note that merge into [[article]] and delete is only a valid option if the information on authorship of the content is somehow preserved, or for public domain text.

Decision Policy

To request that a page (or image) be permanently deleted, the request made on AFD/ND/IFD, and any opinions or comments relating to a listed page must be made in good faith. At the end of the discussion, if a rough consensus has been reached to delete the page, the page will be removed. Otherwise the page remains.

Please do not remove any statements from any deletion discussion. If you suspect an opinion of being stated by a sockpuppet or being otherwise invalid, mark it as such with a comment, and any pertinent links, and leave it there. The admin who reviews the discussion will investigate and decide whether or not to take that opinion into account. By not removing any opinion, we ensure that there can be no arguments over who removed what and why.

Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators expands on this and provides a little rationale.

Early closings

If a clear consensus for a solution is quickly reached that does not involve formal deletion, a deletion discussion may be closed before the end of the discussion period. Examples would include a clear consensus for speedy deletion, a clear consensus for a speedy keep, or a consensus for a redirect. In these situations, the debate should be closed, but remain transcluded on the appropiate deletion page. However, if the proposed solution has not achieved a very clear consensus, the listing should remain for the full five day period.

Help with deletions

The Articles for deletion page gets very busy. Please join the Wikipedia:Cleaning department to help in maintaining it on a regular basis!

See also

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_policy&oldid=36718719"