Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moral economy

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 13:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. POV original research (+website spam) part of a POV series of articles uploaded by User:Roger Hicks. Author has reverted others' attempts to dePOV. --IByte 17:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We can keep this improved version if the Utopian moral economies section is axed or severely rewritten to conform to WP:NPOV. --IByte 16:04, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete OR/POV/WP is not a soapbox. --Etacar11 17:40, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep cleaned up version, as long as it stays NPOV. --Etacar11 05:16, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Please keep! The concept of a "moral market" is very important and deserves an article. The points that I (the author) am making are important and deserve to remain for a while to give those concerned with environmental and sustainability issues a chance to read and appreciate them. It needs to be read and understood in the context of my other recent contributions --Roger Hicks 17 Aug.

  Sorry, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If you can cite published works that discuss this concept under this name, please do so. Gazpacho

• Delete, original research, spam, vanity. Sdedeo 18:01, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete if they need to read your original research, find somewhere else to post it. --Habap 18:03, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep now that it is focused on stuff that is not OR. I love it when the result of a VfD is a re-shaped article that is useful. --Habap 14:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR and POV. Jaxl | talk 18:43, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for every imaginable reason. Paul 00:02, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. -- DS1953 05:08, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep after thorough cleanup. The concept of a "moral economy" is indeed noteworthy; it gets an extended discussion in Joseph Heath's The Efficient Society. It's a standard term used in economics and anthropology for the social interplay between moral ideas and economic activity. Google yields more than 54,000 hits. Smerdis of Tlön 14:31, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Assuming it got saved, have briefly expanded the article with some stubbish discussion of these points. Agree that it still needs serious cleanup. Smerdis of Tlön 14:55, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for these reasons. It is a noteworthy concept, but does need cleanup. I like Smerdis' efforts so far. Jeff Worthington 15:04, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep now that it's cited (although it might need more work). Gazpacho 02:02, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep thanks to Smerdis's work -- allow it to develop further. JimR 05:51, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep but cut the last section on 'Utopian Moral Economy.' The rest could be useful if cleaned up and expanded - User:Brodie
• Keep new version. - ulayiti (talk) 19:48, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I don't think we should keep the external link to spaceship-earth.org on this one (mostly per WP:NOT). --IByte 14:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This still reads like a collection of viewpoints; it does not come together and become encyclopedic. Regarding the 54,000 Google hits, there are plenty of two word combinations-"moral economy" being one of them-that would have lots of search results but aren't worthy of inclusion. Paul 16:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.