Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/RadialEngine

Illustrates the subject Radial engine very well. It really does explain more than a couple of hundred words. Smooth animation, created by User:Duk.

• Nominate and support. - Mikeo 20:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, wow that's one great animation. howcheng {chat} 21:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - brilliant - Jack (talk) 22:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Excellent. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-09-06 22:46Z
• Strong support - Good animation, worth 2000 words. HighInBC 22:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Just a good overall animation; displays the concept well. --Tewy 23:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Pretty dang awesome! InvictaHOG 00:00, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Support Very good animation along with a good representation of what happens in a radial engine. --Midnight Rider 02:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak oppose Nice, clean animation, but I think it would have more encyclopedic value if it included something of the gas flow & combustion, like Image:4-Stroke-Engine.gif, to show the cause & effect. As-is it almost looks more like a kinetic sculpture than explanation of an engine. --Davepape 03:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The two images perfectly explain what's going on. Perhaps a link could be provided? The animation would be too busy if they were combined - Jack (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, adding the gas flow would confuse the image. This simple animation was what made me understand how a radial engine actually works. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Suppport Very informative. --Janke | Talk 06:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Typical FP material. - Darwinek 13:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. very informative --Luc Viatour 14:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very smooth and informative. It's spartan in details, though that makes it easier to understand. --Lewk_of_Serthic _jkycontrib ^talk 15:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Per Lewk_of_Serthic. Nauticashades 17:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Excellent! It's good for pupils! --HarisM 20:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support As well as being informative, it looks good as well!! Jam01 01:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Excellent! —Jared Hunt September 9, 2006, 04:08 (UTC)
• Support What more needs to be said? --Fir0002 12:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - very informative. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 16:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TomStar81 (Talk) 19:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Good point by Davepape about gas flows. But I think that would be an enhancement of what is already, in my opinion, of featured quality. Shushruth ^{\talk\contribs} 15:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Radial engine.gif howcheng {chat} 18:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]