Page:Above the battle.djvu/45: Difference between revisions
m Formatting |
|||
Page body (to be transcluded): | Page body (to be transcluded): | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear |
Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear |
||
to shake the pillars on which it rests |
to shake the pillars on which it rests? Can you |
||
not see that all falls in upon you if one column |
not see that all falls in upon you if one column |
||
be shattered? Could you not have learned if |
be shattered? Could you not have learned if |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
peoples annexed against their will, the equitable |
peoples annexed against their will, the equitable |
||
division of productive labour and the riches of the |
division of productive labour and the riches of the |
||
world |
world? Must the stronger for ever darken the |
||
others with the shadow of his pride, and the |
others with the shadow of his pride, and the |
||
others for ever unite to dissipate it |
others for ever unite to dissipate it? Is there no |
Revision as of 20:25, 27 January 2014
pyre, and, like Hercules, destroying itself with its own hands!
And thus the three greatest nations of the West the guardians of civilisation, rush headlong to their ruin, calling in to their aid Cossacks, Turks, Japanese, Cingalese, Soudanese, Senegalese, Moroccans, Egyptians, Sikhs and Sepoys—barbarians from the poles and those from the equator, souls and bodies of all colours.[1] It is as if the four quarters of the Roman Empire at the time of the Tetrarchy had called upon the barbarians of the whole universe to devour each other.
Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear to shake the pillars on which it rests? Can you not see that all falls in upon you if one column be shattered? Could you not have learned if not to love one another, at least to tolerate the great virtues and the great vices of the other? Was it not your duty to attempt—you have never attempted it in sincerity—to settle amicably the questions which divided you—the problem of peoples annexed against their will, the equitable division of productive labour and the riches of the world? Must the stronger for ever darken the others with the shadow of his pride, and the
others for ever unite to dissipate it? Is there no
41
- ↑ See note, p. 193