Page:Above the battle.djvu/45: Difference between revisions

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Formatting
Page body (to be transcluded):Page body (to be transcluded):
Line 14: Line 14:


Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear
Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear
to shake the pillars on which it rests ? Can you
to shake the pillars on which it rests? Can you
not see that all falls in upon you if one column
not see that all falls in upon you if one column
be shattered? Could you not have learned if
be shattered? Could you not have learned if
Line 24: Line 24:
peoples annexed against their will, the equitable
peoples annexed against their will, the equitable
division of productive labour and the riches of the
division of productive labour and the riches of the
world ? Must the stronger for ever darken the
world? Must the stronger for ever darken the
others with the shadow of his pride, and the
others with the shadow of his pride, and the
others for ever unite to dissipate it ? Is there no
others for ever unite to dissipate it? Is there no

Revision as of 20:25, 27 January 2014

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

pyre, and, like Hercules, destroying itself with its own hands!

And thus the three greatest nations of the West the guardians of civilisation, rush headlong to their ruin, calling in to their aid Cossacks, Turks, Japanese, Cingalese, Soudanese, Senegalese, Moroccans, Egyptians, Sikhs and Sepoys—barbarians from the poles and those from the equator, souls and bodies of all colours.[1] It is as if the four quarters of the Roman Empire at the time of the Tetrarchy had called upon the barbarians of the whole universe to devour each other.

Is our civilisation so solid that you do not fear to shake the pillars on which it rests? Can you not see that all falls in upon you if one column be shattered? Could you not have learned if not to love one another, at least to tolerate the great virtues and the great vices of the other? Was it not your duty to attempt—you have never attempted it in sincerity—to settle amicably the questions which divided you—the problem of peoples annexed against their will, the equitable division of productive labour and the riches of the world? Must the stronger for ever darken the others with the shadow of his pride, and the

others for ever unite to dissipate it? Is there no

41

  1. See note, p. 193