User talk:Shanel

You might want to look at Template talk:header to make your linking easier--BirgitteSB 22:40, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

You are quite welcome! If need help finding anything feel free to ask me.--BirgitteSB 00:55, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Shanel. Thank you for your active involvement with Wikisource! It's nice to see people getting involved in this project. However, I must ask you for a favor. I've noticed that you've split up a number of poetry collection, but made each page contain about five or six poems per. As poems are considered to be "stand alone" texts, would it be possible for you to finish splitting up those works so that each poem has its own page? If you'd rather not do it, that's fine; I can do the job later. Thanks!—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 22:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shanel, Thanks so much for your redirect on the F Scott Fitzgerald page! You made my day!  :) User:hypothermya 23:16, 23 October 2006

Hello I need help writing? 216.220.231.226 16:41, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could you check my writing Shanel? 169.244.143.115 17:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Shanel need help with new entries their really good check it out! 169.244.143.115 18:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Glad to help!—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 00:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you have removed the page that I just created, and mentioned copyvio as a reason. I am not an expert regarding copyright matters, but isn't press releases in the public domain? It has been published by a large number of sites, newspapers and what not. -- 80.163.22.203 19:03, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if it change the situation, but I thought I might mention that it didn't just appear in Jyllandsposten, but also (at the same time) in the French publication 'Charlie Hebdo'. In other words, it didn't just appear in a single publication, and that make me doubt that Jyllandsposten should own the copyright: [1] -- 80.163.22.203 19:28, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Shanel,

You are now an admin. Please remember to go to "preferences > Editing" and flag your edits as patrolled. Thanks!—Zhaladshar ^(Talk) 23:13, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, sorry I didn't make that clear. I'm just fiddling around, I'm not really making any drastic changes. Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused.--Politicaljunkie 19:36, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have seen you moving some national anthem pages to their non-Latin native names. I consider it a problem as this is English Wikisource, not multilingual Wikisource.--Jusjih 01:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have received your message. Please go to Wikisource:Scriptorium#Article titles should probably be limited to Latin alphabets here to express your opinion before moving them to the transliterated name of the anthem, or the English translation of the name, as we do not have a definite opinion yet.--Jusjih 02:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Now what? Train Of Thought 01:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Shanel. I have created this page to publish Gargantua by Rabelais on the English wikisource, but I have some difficulties with the talk page : which one of these two ought to be deleted? this one? or that one? Thanks for your help. --Zephyrus 23:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!--Zephyrus 12:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi Shanel. I just realized that you deleted Template:Tl a few days ago (which explained why it was missing until I recreated it a day or two later). The template is heavily used (on the Scriptorium and other places, as you can see from the "what links here"), so I'm not sure why you deleted it. If you had a good reason though, sorry for recreating it. Maybe Wikisource:Proposed deletions would be a good way to go next time? --Spangineer^wp (háblame) 13:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

See the discussion Spangineer posted to the Proposed deletions talk page. :) —[admin] Pathoschild 19:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply