Jump to content

Talk:Interwiki map: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Pppery in topic Proposed additions
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{autotranslate|base=Interwiki map header}}
{{autotranslate|base=Interwiki map header}}
{{Autoarchive resolved section | age = 3 | archive = '((FULLPAGENAME))/Archives/((year))' | level = 3}}
{{Autoarchive resolved section | age = 3 | archive = '((FULLPAGENAME))/Archives/((year))' | level = 3}}

__TOC__


== Proposed additions ==
== Proposed additions ==
Line 6: Line 8:
|text=The Interwiki Map exists to allow a more efficient syntax for linking between wikis, and thus promote the cooperation and proliferation of wikis and free content.
|text=The Interwiki Map exists to allow a more efficient syntax for linking between wikis, and thus promote the cooperation and proliferation of wikis and free content.


This section is for proposing a new interwiki link prefix. Interwiki prefixes should be reserved for websites that would be useful on a '''significant''' number of pages ({{tl|LinkSummary}} can help). Websites useful only to a few pages should be linked to with the usual [[Help:Link#External links|external link syntax]]. Please don't propose additions of sites with too few pages or that contain copyright infringing content, such as YouTube. As a guide, sites considered for inclusion should probably
This section is for proposing a new interwiki link prefix. Interwiki prefixes should be reserved for websites that would be useful on a '''significant''' number of pages ({{tl|LinkSummary}} can help). Websites useful only to a few pages should be linked to with the usual [[Help:Link#External links|external link syntax]]. Please don't propose additions of sites with too few pages or that contain copyright infringing content, such as YouTube. As a guide, sites considered for inclusion
# be useful on a significant number of pages
# provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site
# provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site
# be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects
# be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects
# be free content (under a Commons-acceptable license)
# be a wiki
# have reasonable amounts of content
# not contain [[w:malware|malware]]
# not contain [[w:malware|malware]]
# be expected to remain working for a long time in the future and not suffer from [[w:link rot|link rot]]


Add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section. When requesting a new prefix, please '''explain why it would be useful''' keeping the above in mind. Admins, please allow consensus to form (or at least no objections to be raised over a period of a few days) before adding new entries, as once added they are hard to remove from the many copies around the world.
Add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section. When requesting a new prefix, please '''explain why it would be useful''' keeping the above in mind. Admins, please allow consensus to form (or at least no objections to be raised over a period of a few days) before adding new entries, as once added they are hard to remove from the many copies around the world.


Requests for removal should be submitted on the talk page in the removals section and will be decided on by a Meta admin.
Requests for removal should be submitted on the talk page in the removals section and will be decided on by a Meta admin.
Line 20: Line 21:
}}
}}


===OmegaWiki===
======
{{LinkSummary|omegawiki.org}} link: http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:$1
{{LinkSummary|.}}
{{interwiki request
I'm pretty surprised that I didn't see this here already: OmegaWiki is a good and extensive non-WMF wiki with incoming links. I think we should support it thought the map. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 17:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
|action = new
:There are about 600+ links, though some by same person in user space, and others in multi-language translations. Either way there looks to be a general acceptance by the community that linking to the site is reasonable, and if that is the case, then our making it easier, and more resilient to change also sounds reasonable. Anyone see downsides to the interwiki? &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 12:19, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
|status = temp
::Nope. I like the idea. In fact, there was a "Multilingual Wiktionary" project on Incubator that was trying to move in that direction, but in the end there was no need for it, because OmegaWiki already exists. [[User:StevenJ81|StevenJ81]] ([[User talk:StevenJ81|talk]]) 03:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
|interwiki = FandomSite
::Actually it is [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Adopt_OmegaWiki intended] to move it to our servers and integrate it into Wikidata/Wiktionary someday. --[[User:Vogone|Vogone]] ([[User talk:Vogone|talk]]) 03:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
|stemurl = https://community.fandom.com/wiki/w:c:
:::That's stretching a point; right now it seems like an open proposal, nothing more. [[User:StevenJ81|StevenJ81]] ([[User talk:StevenJ81|talk]]) 03:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
|item = Q17459
::::It only lacks implementation, there is very clear consensus to move forward and OmegaWiki itself already decided to make the way free for the move. It may be true that it still is going to be rejected despite the consensus, but the ''intent'' to move cannot be denied. --[[User:Vogone|Vogone]] ([[User talk:Vogone|talk]]) 14:35, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
|wikidatastatus=
Final thoughts? &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 01:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
}}
:{{Ping|billinghurst}} Seems uncontroversial to me. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 05:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Can someone please add this? —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 09:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
:{{support}} it is basically a superior version of the Wiktionary, and contains a lot more languages. --[[User:Donald Trung|Donald Trung]] ([[User talk:Donald Trung|Talk 🤳🏻]]) ([[Steward requests/Global/2017-08#Global lock Donald Trung and sockpuppets|My global lock 😒🌏🔒]]) ([[Steward requests/Global/2017-09|My global unlock 😄🌏🔓]]) 10:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
*{{ping|billinghurst}} Can you please add or close and archive? —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 06:21, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
**{{Ping|Billinghurst}}. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 09:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


An interwiki for Fandom currently exists as [[:wikia:]] and its alias [[:wikiasite:]] (along with specific interwikis to certain Fandom-hosted wikis), but there is no alias named "Fandom". Since the site has been renamed, I suggest allowing the new terminology to be used in links as well, to avoid confusion. Thanks, [[User:EpicPupper|EpicPupper]] ([[User talk:EpicPupper|talk]]) 00:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
===uMap===
{{LinkSummary|umap.openstreetmap.fr}} link: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/$1


:{{ping|EpicPupper}} that seems to be half a story.<p>I have not buried myself into the history of fandom/wikia ins and outs, so please take a step back and look to concisely re-explain what has happened, what it needing to be achieved, and any politics that are at play so the community can make an informed decision. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 03:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Bonjour! uMap is one of the largest multilangual online map service that use layers / opensource / OpenStreetMap. We use it a lot within Wiki pages, not only in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch/*.umap.openstreetmap.fr&limit=500&offset=0&target=http%3A%2F%2F%2A.umap.openstreetmap.fr English] or [https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial:Recherche_de_lien/*.umap.openstreetmap.fr&limit=500&offset=0&target=http%3A%2F%2F%2A.umap.openstreetmap.fr French], but also in other languages. It would be awesome to have an Interwiki created for uMap. Especially right now, since we're organising the [[w:en:Wikipedia:Contribution Month in Canada 2017|Canadian Contribution Month]]!! Thank you in advance. Best regards, [[User:Benoit Rochon|Benoit Rochon]] ([[User talk:Benoit Rochon|talk]]) 17:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
::@[[User:Billinghurst|Billinghurst]], sure, here is some more information about the rename. In 2016, Wikia, a wiki hosting platform founded by Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley Starling, underwent a major rebranding effort and changed its name to Fandom powered by Wikia [https://community.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Craiglpalmer/Wikia_is_now_Fandom_powered_by_Wikia 1]. The name change was announced in a blog post on the Wikia website, which stated that the new name better reflected the platform's focus on communities and fan-created content. In a series of later changes from 2019-2021, all wikis migrated from wikia.org domains to fandom.com domains, and the Wikia branding was stripped completely [https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Help:Wikia.org_domain_migration 2]. These changes were mostly uncontroversial and there was little negative feedback from the Fandom community following them. (Most opposers softened their tone a couple of years after the transition). Even if the community largely did not support these changes, that is irrelevant in this situation as "Fandom" is ultimately the official name of the website. Hope that helps! I think this change is relatively minor as it is merely adding an alias to the existing link, not a completely new one. [[User:EpicPupper|EpicPupper]] ([[User talk:EpicPupper|talk]]) 06:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
:I support this. [[User:Amqui|Amqui]] ([[User talk:Amqui|talk]]) 02:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
:[[:wikt:fandom#English|Fandom]] is a generic noun - could that be a problem? "fandomcom", "fandomdotcom" or "fandomwiki" would be more specific. [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 11:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
::Can you give some examples of the urls in use and how they are stable. Thanks. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 14:24, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
::Looking back, my comment above doesn't sound very meaningful. Let me try again. What I'm uneasy about is that this proposal is to replace a proper noun ("Wikia") to a generic noun which happens to be trademarked ("Fandom"). The change will increase ambiguity. It looks like when English Wikipedia moved the article, they added a disambiguation, probably because "fandom" is too ambiguous: [[:en:Wikia]]→[[:en:Fandom (website)]]. [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 14:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
:::*{{comment}} At the moment system tells me ... COIBot> 154 records; Top 10 wikis where umap.openstreetmap.fr has been added: w:fr (31), w:de (16), w:en (15), m (8), w:tr (8), w:es (6), www.mediawiki (6), w:ar (5), w:ca (4), de.wikivoyage (4).
:::I don't see the issue that you're trying to solve here and I don't see the ambiguity. If someone is making an inter''wiki'' link with the "fandom" prefix it's obvious that they're trying to link to the website containing a massive wiki farm, they're not going to be trying to link to a music album, a documentary or the abstract concept of "a group of fans". [[Special:Contributions/192.76.8.66|192.76.8.66]] 16:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
The community is using uMap a lot. I'm the president Wikimedia Canada and we use uMap layers very often, since many years. We would like to have an interwiki for https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/$1 ... This is just common sense. Thank you to make this happen. Best regards. [[User:Benoit Rochon|Benoit Rochon]] ([[User talk:Benoit Rochon|talk]]) 03:19, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
::::Concur with 192. I would oppose FandomSite or any alternatives as I believe that they are unnecessary. [[User:Frostly|Frostly]] ([[User talk:Frostly|talk]]) 23:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Девочка Енота}} The request was to have example urls and demonstration that they are stable. That is still a requirement for us to place an interwiki. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 03:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
::Hello [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] & [[user:Девочка Енота|Девочка Енота]], I use the uMap at least twice a year for Wikimedia contests :
::* Wiki Loves Monuments Italia: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/it/map/tutti-i-vincitori-di-wiki-loves-monuments-2016-ita_116655#6/42.699/13.689
::* 2016 worldwide edit-a-thon: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/mois-international-de-la-contribution-francophone-_66778#3/15.37/-8.61
::* 2016 Montreal Commons contest: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/marche-photographique-de-villeray-2017_133907#14/45.5450/-73.6172
::* 2017 same in English: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/wikipedia-contribution-training-wikimedia-canada_165833#4/53.62/-79.98
::* 2017 same in German: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/wikipedia-contribution-training-wikimedia-canada_165833#4/53.67/-79.98
::* 2017 same in Japanease: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/ja/map/wikipedia-contribution-training-wikimedia-canada_165833#4/53.67/-79.98
::* Query search "Wiki" : http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/search/?q=wiki
:: I use uMap for the past 5 years and URLs https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/$1 are stable and multilingual. Best regards, [[User:Benoit Rochon|Benoit Rochon]] ([[User talk:Benoit Rochon|talk]]) 13:34, 24 January 2018 (UTC)


* {{interwikicheck|wikia}} <= high level of usage, still pertinent link
===regiowiki.at===
* {{interwikicheck|wikiasite}} <= high level of usage, still pertinent link
{{LinkSummary|regiowiki.at}} Link: http://regiowiki.at/wiki/$1 prefix:regio:
* {{interwikicheck|fandom}} <- noting that existing use may indicate that this is a namespace name, not that such perturb us
# provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site: it is a special wiki for topics, that dont merit a separate Wikipedia article in de.wikipedia.org but are appropriate for a wiki with more localized content and viewers. So serveral articles are used to be exported to regiowiki.at from de.wikipedia.org. Sometimes articles are re-imported to de.wikipedia.org, when topics have been gaining in importance.<br />Many wiki-newbies start working in regiowiki.at and then change to de.wikipedia.org<br />Regiowiki.at is suported by WMAT (Wikimedia Austria) as a [https://www.wikimedia.at/projekte/partnerprojekte/ partner project of WMAT]
&nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 00:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
# be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects: It is a private wiki, that requires user registration before any edit is permitted. Registration is done by sysops and requires application via email;
# be free content (under a Commons-acceptable license): Source of files and pics is simply WikiCommons, see e.g. [http://regiowiki.at/wiki/Spezial:Meistbenutzte_Dateien most used files on regiowiki.at];
# be a wiki: yes;
# have reasonable amounts of content: lots of content already with 25,743,616 hits (!); see [http://regiowiki.at main side (german)], among others;
# not contain [[w:malware|malware]]: of course not.
Thanks a lot, --[[User:Agruwie|Agruwie]] ([[User talk:Agruwie|talk]]) 22:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


:{{ping|EricPupper}} Why do you have namespace codes <syntaxhighlight inline lang="wikitext">w:c:</syntaxhighlight> in the proposed prefix ? Can you please provide some sample landing targets? Thanks. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 03:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
* Hmm. Much of the linking at dewiki seems <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:Weblinksuche/*.regiowiki.at> to be at user talk pages. Why? &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 15:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
::<code><nowiki>[[w:c:wikiname:Pagename]]</nowiki></code> is how you link from one Fandom wiki to another.[https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Help:Interwiki_links#Linking_to_another_Fandom_wiki] [[User:MSMST1543|MSMST1543]] ([[User talk:MSMST1543|talk]]) 01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
*: {{ping|Agruwie}} would you please respond; otherwise the next step is most likely to be closed as not done. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 14:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
::https://about.fandom.com/about says "over 40 million content pages in over 80 languages on 250,000 wikis". The page "The Joker" in the wiki "batman" is at https://batman.fandom.com/wiki/The_Joker. We cannot generate such a url directly with "batman" and "The Joker" in different places so we rely on redirects at Fandom. These both work currently:
*:: Oh, I'm so sorry i didn't respond! I didn't realised there was a question :(
:* https://community.fandom.com/wiki/w:c:batman:The_Joker
::: There are many links to regiowiki.at at user talk pages, because during relevance discussion or deletion discussion regiowiki.at often is suggested as an alternative wiki for articles focusing on regional issues, best --[[User:Agruwie|Agruwie]] ([[User talk:Agruwie|talk]]) 03:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
:* https://community.fandom.com/wiki/c:batman:The_Joker
::I don't know whether both forms work for all Fandom wikis and will continue to work. Considering they ask their own users to write <code>w:c:</code> at [https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Help:Interwiki_links#Linking_to_another_Fandom_wiki], I guess it's safest to use that form. We already say https://community.fandom.com/wiki/w:c:$1 for both <code>wikia:</code>, <code>WikiaSite:</code> and <code>Wikicity:</code>, and I haven't heard complaints about broken links. The proposal is simply to add one more prefix for this. The site has been called [[:w:Fandom (website)|Fandom]] and located at fandom.com for years so it seems reasonable. Four prefixes for the same site is a lot but considering their size and Fandom branding, I don't think we should worry about having a fourth prefix. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 23:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
:I'm still not sure if the new name is recognized well as a website name, without adding some sort of disambiguation. "Wikia" had 13 years (2006-2019), while "Fandom" had 8 years (2016-2014), according to [[:en:Fandom (website)]]. Maybe revisit in a few years? [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 10:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
::I should have written 2016-2024 instead of 2016-2014. Sorry if that was confusing. [[User:Whym|whym]] ([[User talk:Whym|talk]]) 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
: Interwiki.list is behind even the Fandom updates. I'll handle that, but any further changes here should probably be propogated there. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
: This looks fine to add to me. I'll submit it though code review to update interwiki.list first, though. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
:: This was added to interwiki.list. Now fine to add to Meta as well. I agree "fandom" by itself is clear enough. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 05:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)


=== Several frequently used sites on Wikimedia Commons ===
=== outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org ===
{{LinkSummary|outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org}} Link: https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/$1 prefix:dashboard:
# tool developped by WMF.
# stable link : https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/$1
# easy to use prefix : <code><nowiki>[[:dashboard:]]</nowiki></code> /or/ <code><nowiki>[[:wmfdashboard:]]</nowiki></code>
# provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects.
# relevant for edit-a-thons, organizers, users, stats, etc.
# allow to create "Enroll" buttons using an non external link.


The following websites are very widely used on Commons as part of [[:c:Template:Authority control|authority control]], based on the Wikidata properties {{Property|P243}}, {{Property|P213}} and {{Property|P244}}; by creating interwiki prefixes for them, we can link to them using interwiki instead of external link syntax, which is better for the database (see [[:c:Module talk:Authority control#Use interwiki links instead of external links if possible|Commons discussion]] and [[phabricator:T343131|T343131]]). --[[User:Lucas Werkmeister|Lucas Werkmeister]] ([[User talk:Lucas Werkmeister|talk]]) 21:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unsigned|2=4 January 2018‎|Benoit Rochon}}


{{collapse top|expand=1|Interwiki request templates}}
=== transit.wiki ===
{{interwiki request|action=new|status=done|interwiki=oclc|stemurl=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/|item=Q846596|wikidatastatus=done}}
transitunlimited.org was the old domain name of the wiki before the move in 2016. All the links to transitunlimited.org are automatically redirected to transit.wiki.
{{interwiki request|action=new|status=done|interwiki=isni|stemurl=https://isni.org/isni/|item=Q423048|wikidatastatus=done}}
{{interwiki request|action=new|status=done|interwiki=lofc|stemurl=https://id.loc.gov/authorities/|item=Q18912790|wikidatastatus=done}}
{{collapse bottom}}


* {{S}}. These are widely used on other projects, also. See [[:en:Template:Authority control]], for example. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 14:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|transitunlimited.org}}
* "LOC" is not suitable as an interwiki because there's a film called [[w:LOC: Kargil|''LOC: Kargil'']] with articles on lots of wikis, and it conflicts with a hypothetical Wikipedia in the [[w:Onhan language|Onhan language]]. The website is probably reasonable to add with a different prefix. The other two look fine to add to me. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|transit.wiki}} Link: https://www.transit.wiki/$1 prefix:Transit:
*: {{ping|Lucas Werkmeister|Pigsonthewing}} Added oclc and isni (the interwiki map used on Wikimedia wikis is cached so it will take manual effort tracked at [[phab:T368862]] to update). I am not willing to add a prefix that conflicts with existing uses, but would be willing to add the Library of Congress with a different prefix. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 18:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
#
*:: {{ping|Pppery|Lucas Werkmeister}} "lofc", perhaps? <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 20:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
# stable link : https://www.transit.wiki/$1
*::: Fine in principle, but will wait for other comments before implementing. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 20:55, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
*::Thanks for adding the first two! (The cached interwiki map is updated by now, so [[oclc:756372754]] and [[isni:000000012146438X]] work now.) For the Library of Congress, it doesn’t look like there are any common acronyms for it other than LoC and LC, both of which are not suitable, so I guess LofC seems as good as any other prefix we could invent. [[User:Lucas Werkmeister|Lucas Werkmeister]] ([[User talk:Lucas Werkmeister|talk]]) 18:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
*::: "lc:" is actually surprisingly interesting. It's [[silcode:lc|not a valid language code]] and Global Search shows [https://global-search.toolforge.org/?ignorecase=1&namespaces=&q=%22%5B%5Blc%3A%22&regex=1&title= an odd mixed-bag of uses]. There's one user who stuck an interwiki for every two-letter code imaginable inside a display:none across several wikis. There are 10 pages using it as an example of an interwiki despite it not being one. There's a YouTube channel named "LC:AZE" but it's not notable and was deleted but has redlinks in two separate articles. Some old help pages expect it to be documentation on the "lc:" parser function for lowercasing text. None of these are individually significant blockers but I think in aggregate it's probably better to use lofc. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 21:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


Added as lofc. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
# provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site
{{Section resolved|[[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)}}
#* Allows easy linking to detailed transit information. The wiki is designed specifically as a travel guide on public transportation. Some users on Wikipedia tried to include detailed transit information for specific locations but got rejected because such information takes too much space relative to other relevant contents and not meeting the purpose of Wikipedia. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Oakland_Coliseum_station#Request_for_comments_on_bus_table_inclusion] for example. Transit.wiki and Wikipedia have separate purposes for the same transit system or transit infrastructure: one focuses on being a user guide and directory, the other focuses on background, history, and controversies.
# be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects
#* Transit.wiki has operated for a decade spam free. User accounts are manually approved.
# be free content (under a Commons-acceptable license)
#* CC BY-SA 3.0
# be a wiki
#* yes
# have reasonable amounts of content
#* 37,043 content pages covering transit routes (down to individual route level), transit centers/stations, and community destinations.
# not contain malware
#* no malware.
[[User:Acnetj|Acnetj]] ([[User talk:Acnetj|talk]]) 08:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


=== Miraheze ===
:I see about 70 links on wikis to transitunlimited.org; and no links to transit.wiki. How much do you believe it is going to be used? &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 14:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|miraheze.org}}
:: There's no direct lines to transit.wiki because the old links to transitunlimited.org got redirected to transit.wiki automatically. There should be at least 70 links. [[User:Acnetj|Acnetj]] ([[User talk:Acnetj|talk]]) 02:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
{{interwiki request
|action = new
|status =
|interwiki = Miraheze
|stemurl = https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/
|item =
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Previously discussed in [[Talk:Interwiki_map/Archives/2019#Miraheze|2019]], [[Talk:Interwiki_map/Archives/2022#Miraheze|2022]] and [[Talk:Interwiki_map/Archives/2023#Miraheze|2023]]. The major reason against it is it is run by John F. Lewis, a WMF-banned user; this is no longer true since control of Miraheze has beed handed to another US entity (and John has resigned in March 2023). So we may reconsider it.--[[User:GZWDer|GZWDer]] ([[User talk:GZWDer|talk]]) 05:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
:Is it being sufficiently used to be reconsidered? While the ban aspect may be a consideration, the primary consideration is that it is needed. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 10:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
:: Based on LinkSearch I see enough uses. I won't add this myself since I'm a contributor to Miraheze, but an addition is warranted. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 00:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
::: But we definitely should wait until Miraheze decides whether to rename itself to WikiTide first, so we don't have to go through this process again if they decide to. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
:::: It looks like [https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Board_of_Directors/Meetings/20240505-Minutes the plan to rebrand has been "Indefinitely postponed"], so this should be good to go. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 17:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


=== WikiTrek.org ===
=== ===
{{interwiki request
{{LinkSummary|wikitrek.org}} Link: https://wikitrek.org/index.php/$1 prefix:<code>wikitrek:</code>
|action = new
{{LinkSummary|hypertrek.info}}
|status = onhold
|interwiki = api (or wapi or apidoc, in case api is a language code)
|stemurl = https://api.wikimedia.org/wiki/
|item =
|wikidatastatus=
}}


The Wikimedia API Portal is a wiki that documents various APIs around Wikimedia projects. It seems to make sense to not display them as external links. {{unsigned|Denny|18:45, 11 April 2024}}
''WikiTrek'' is an open project aimed to convert [[it:HyperTrek]] from a custom-made dynamic site to a wiki based on MediaWiki.<br />
:I suggest <code>wmapi</code>. [[User:Nardog|Nardog]] ([[User talk:Nardog|talk]]) 12:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
''HyperTrek'' is the most comprehensive guide to [[en:Star Trek]] in Italian, but it is no longer actively maintained. To update the site, improve collaboration and simplify contributions, all the data have been transferred from the old site to new wiki. This wiki already has several contributors and we think the user base will increase in due time.
:: Would recommend waiting for the outcome of [[phab:T358303|T358303]] first. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 00:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


=== shoutwiki ===
Italian Wikipedia already tooks data from Hypertrek, but it does not make sense to duplicate that information: this is lenghty manual process. With this conversion, the content of the site was automatically converted to a MediaWiki site and, implementing this interwiki link, all the content con be linked directly from Wikipedia. So users an take advantage from a complete data set and easy linking with no manual work.
{{LinkSummary|shoutwiki.com}}
Included in [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/source/mediawiki/browse/master/maintenance/interwiki.sql default interwiki map] as <code>shoutwiki:</code>. ShoutWiki is a wiki farm hosting over 13,000 wikis, most licensed under CC BY-SA. Top 40 Wikipedias have over 500 links to them. Any wiki can be reached using link <code><nowiki>http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/</nowiki>w:''subdomain'':''page''</code>. [[User:01miki10|01miki10]] ([[User talk:01miki10|talk]]) 13:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
:{{comment}} - If we are making an interwiki for this, then we might use one for [[mw:Miraheze]] too. <small>—The preceding [[Help:Signature|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:LightningComplexFire|LightningComplexFire]] ([[User talk:LightningComplexFire|{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}]]) 18:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)</small><!--added with Template:Unsigned-->
:: Miraheze is unlikely to be added per [[Talk:Interwiki_map/Archives/2019#Miraheze]]. &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 14:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
:<small>This section was archived on a request by: &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 10:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)</small>
:: Restored from archive since this was archived without resolution. Either it should be removed from the default interwiki map or it should be added to the local one - it's bizarre for something to be in the default map but not the local one. No opinion on which. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
::: Leaning toward "add here" since there seem to be [https://global-search.toolforge.org/?q=shoutwiki&namespaces=&title= hundreds to thousands of uses]. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 00:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


== Proposed removals ==
Tu summarize:
{{messagebox
# ''provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site''<br />It is the most comprehensive guide to [[w:Star Trek|Star Trek]] in italian
|text=This section is for proposing that a prefix be disabled; please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section. Remember to '''explain why it should be disabled''', particularly in view of the difficulty involved in correcting any use of the prefix (to generate a list of pages to fix: [[toollabs:pirsquared/iw.php]]). Please add {{tlx|Interwikicheck|interwiki code}} to top of the new section.
# ''be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects''<br />spam does not exist on the site and the community will take care this will be the case in future as well
# ''be free content (under a Commons-acceptable license)''<br />texts are released under '''CC BY-SA 4.0''' or '''GFDL'''
# ''be a wiki''<br />it is a wiki based on standard MediaWiki installation
# ''have reasonable amounts of content''<br />site currently has more than 14.000 pages
# ''not contain [[w:malware|malware]]''<br />it does not contain any malware


Interwiki map entries should generally be removed if the site (or the specific part of the site being linked to) is dead, broken, no longer hosts the content that was intended to be linked to. Legacy interwiki prefixes that never had any non-trivial uses at all can also be removed.
[[User:Lucamauri|Lucamauri]] ([[User talk:Lucamauri|talk]]) 08:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{support}} I support this project because is the natural evolution of HyperTrek. --[[User:Hypertrek|Hypertrek]] ([[User talk:Hypertrek|talk]]) 10:36, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{support}} I support this project. It is an up-to-date blending between a classical hypertext project started decades ago, and an interactive, editable by everyone portal, in the spirit of the wiki initiatives. [[User:Afullo|Afullo]] ([[User talk:Afullo|talk]]) 10:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


Interwikis that would otherwise be removed but had too many uses to clean up may be repointed to [[Interwiki map/discontinued]].
=== L'Enciclopèdia ===
{{LinkSummary|lenciclopedia.org}}
Link: https://www.lenciclopedia.org/$1 prefix:<code>lenciclopedia:</code>


When removing a prefix, also check if it's in [https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/maintenance/interwiki.list interwiki.list] (the default interwikis added by the installer when a new MediaWiki wiki is installed). That file is managed via Gerrit.
''L'Enciclopèdia'' (formerly known as ''Uiquipèdia'') is a wiki encyclopedia project written in [[wikipedia:en:Valencian|Valencian]], but using orthography from the [[wikipedia:es:Real Academia de Cultura Valenciana|Real Acadèmia de Cultura Valenciana]] ([[wikipedia:es:Normas del Puig|El Puig Rules]]), which defends an ortographical and grammar standard completely different from standard [[wikipedia:en:Catalan language|Catalan]] (as regulated by the [[wikipedia:Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua|Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua]] and the [[wikipedia:Institut d'Estudis Catalans|Institut d'Estudis Catalans]]), used in the [[wikipedia:ca:Portada|Catalan/Valencian Wikipedia (Viquipèdia)]]. This website fulfills the six criteria for inclusion and I propose to add it to the interwiki map. --[[User:Agusbou2015|Agusbou2015]] ([[User talk:Agusbou2015|talk]]) 22:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)


Completed requests are marked with {{[[Template:done|done]]}} or {{[[Template:not done|not done]]}} and moved to the archives.
=== Debian Wiki ===
}}
{{LinkSummary|wiki.debian.org}}


=== wmve ===
Link: https://wiki.debian.org/$1


{{interwiki request
Prefix: <code>debian:</code> or <code>debianwiki:</code>.
|action = removal
|status = on hold
|interwiki = wmve
|stemurl =
|item = Q18559911
|wikidatastatus=
}}


Dead, attempting to access this site results in an NXDOMAIN error. According to [[Interwiki map/detailed table]] this has/had hundreds of uses. I suggest remapping this to point at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Venezuela, to match what has been done with a number of other dead chapter sites. [[Special:Contributions/192.76.8.66|192.76.8.66]] 16:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Frequently linked to on more technical wikis like [https://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?target=wiki.debian.org&title=Special%3ALinkSearch mediawiki.org] and [https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?target=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.debian.org&title=Special%3ALinkSearch wikitech], and quite a few on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?target=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.debian.org&title=Special%3ALinkSearch English Wikipedia], which surprised me.
:Multiple uses, would need to be remapped with explanation. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 22:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
:: This is no longer a nxdomain, it's now a wordpress site saying "this site is under maintenance". Not sure what to do here. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 22:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi there! The site is under maintenance, due to a failed provider's change. The chapter isn't dead. We're working to solve it. Thanks! --[[User:Ybsen lucero|Ybsen lucero]] ([[User talk:Ybsen lucero|talk]]) 10:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


=== aquariumwiki ===
Full disclosure: I'm a [https://wiki.debian.org/DebianDeveloper Debian developer]. [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 07:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = aquariumwiki
|stemurl =
|item = Q106163958
|wikidatastatus=
}}
This is a tricky one. The wiki it points to is overrun by spambots, but it does still have some useful content, and is used in a bunch of places. We could just take no action. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 03:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


=== git ===
* If it were to be added, I'd force the https linking in the interwiki as proposed, despite having links in http. &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 00:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = git
|stemurl =
|item = Q106171018
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Conflicts with language code. See [[phab:T360792]]. Has 700 uses so cleanup would be a pain, and this is a very theoretical issue and probably not going to come up, so feel free to decline this, but putting it here for the record. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 04:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
=== zum ===
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = zum
|stemurl =
|item =
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Conflicts with language code. See [[phab:T360792]]. Has 100 uses so cleanup would be a pain, and this is a very theoretical issue and probably not going to come up, so feel free to decline this, but putting it here for the record. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 04:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
=== aew ===
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = aew
|stemurl =
|item =
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Conflicts with language code. See [[phab:T360792]]. Relatively low use so not sure this meets the criteria for an interwiki anyway and may warrant total removal. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 04:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
: This also conflicts with [[w:All Elite Wrestling|All Elite Wrestling]] shows (I fixed three different articles that intended to link to that) and the target site is largely dead. Now definitely in favor of removal, but ideally someone who speaks Arabic would to clean up [https://global-search.toolforge.org/?q=%22%5B%5Baew%3A%22&regex=1&ignorecase=1&namespaces=&title= the remaining uses] first. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 21:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


=== MarioWiki ===
=== ===
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = twl
|stemurl =
|item =
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Conflicts with language code. See [[phab:T360792]]. Surprisingly few uses so suggest renaming to something longer. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 04:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
: See [[Talk:The Wikipedia Library#Rename twl interwiki]]. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 21:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


=== PokeWiki ===
{{LinkSummary|mariowiki.net}}
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = PokeWiki
|stemurl = https://pokewiki.de/
|item = Q106165755
|wikidatastatus=done
}}
{{interwiki request
|action = remove
|status =
|interwiki = PokéWiki
|stemurl = https://pokewiki.de/
|item = Q106165755
|wikidatastatus=done
}}
Per [[/Archives/2023#PokeWiki]], it's worth considering removal of both of these interwikis. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 15:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


=== omegawiki ===
Link: https://mariowiki.net/wiki/$1


{{interwiki request
Prefix: <tt>mariowikide</tt> or <tt>demariowiki</tt>
|action = removal
|status =
|interwiki = omegawiki
|stemurl = http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:$1
|item = Q154436
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Dead site. Only one use from 2017 anyway. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 00:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
=== wikipapers ===
{{interwiki request
|action = removal
|status =
|interwiki = wikipapers
|stemurl = http://wikipapers.referata.com
|item = Q34627462
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Dead site. Probably has enough uses to warrant an entry on [[Interwiki map/discontinued]] [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
=== scramble ===
{{interwiki request
|action = removal
|status =
|interwiki = scramble
|stemurl = http://wiki.scramble.nl
|item = Q34627462
|wikidatastatus=
}}
No longer seems to host a wiki. This could become just https://scramble.nl/$1 but given the few uses and the fact that nobody seemingly noticed I would delete it instead. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


=== communityscheme ===
To summarize:
{{interwiki request
1. provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site: MarioWiki.net is the German counterpart to MarioWiki.com, which already is included in the interwiki list and the largest independent German site about Mario-related topics.
|action = removal
|status =
|interwiki = communityscheme
|stemurl = http://community.schemewiki.org/
|item = Q106178203
|wikidatastatus=
}}
Zero uses per global-search, pattern looks fixably broken (can be fixed to http://community.schemewiki.org/?$1). But if nobody uses the interwiki and it's been broken for who-knows-how-long then what's the point? [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


== Requests for updates ==
2. be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects: Of course I won't encourage our contributors to spam links in Wikipedia, also most of the Mario-related articles in the German Wikipedia already have weblinks in the classic format to MarioWiki.net articles. On our wiki, we don't have any spam problems.
{{messagebox
|text=This section is for requesting update for an existing interwiki. This could be needed if your site's URL has changed. Please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section.


When updating a prefix, also check if it's in [https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/maintenance/interwiki.list interwiki.list] (the default interwikis added by the installer when a new MediaWiki wiki is installed). That file is managed via Gerrit.
3.be free content (under a Commons-acceptable license): our articles are licensed with CC-by-NC-SA.
}}
=== HammondWiki ===
{{LinkSummary|www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/}}
{{Interwikicheck|HammondWiki}}


Current URL pattern
4. be a wiki: self-hosted MediaWiki-based wiki


<code><nowiki>http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/index.php3?$1</nowiki></code>
5. have reasonable amounts of content: currently almost 6000 articles


Proposed URL pattern
6.not contain malware: no ads, no external scripts, up-to-date software. Should not be in risk of becoming a malware-spreading site.


<code><nowiki>https://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/index.php3?$1</nowiki></code>
[[User:Semako96|Semako96]] ([[User talk:Semako96|talk]]) 22:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


This site supports https, so it would probably be a good idea for the interwiki mapping to be updated to use it.
=== Wikimedia beta deployment cluster ===
{{LinkSummary|deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org}} link: https://deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Expression:$1
* Prefix : Deployment
* Well I just found it weird, that our own beta cluster is not on interwiki map.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous|AldNonymous]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous|Bicara?]]</sup> 15:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
: There's nothing in that wiki interesting to link to IIRC. What do we need an IW prefix for? &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 19:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
:: A possible usage could be to use it for easy navigation from here to that wiki cluster, though I do not believe I would use it much myself. --[[User:Vogone|Vogone]] ([[User talk:Vogone|talk]]) 20:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
:::What permanent links were you envisaging? From which wikis? Can you please provide some real use examples. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 20:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
::::{{u|billinghurst}}, during the content translation testing on that beta cluster (few years back) I have to use url instead of interwiki link, though it's currently no longer needed (as content translation extension is already deployed), I would like to see if deployment got interwiki linked so in the future there will be no longer hassle of doing this, I saw the practicality in this. Also, if it possible to this link [https://deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Special:SiteMatrix site matrix] or [https://meta.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/Main_Page the meta itself], as an addendum I am fine if this request get rejected, I just thought this gonna make things easier for beta tester to do things that got reported to phab and need interwiki linking to here. PS : also per external search here on meta and en.wp :
* [[Special:LinkSearch/*.deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org]]
* [[Special:LinkSearch/https://*.deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org]]
* [[:en:Special:LinkSearch/https://*.deployment.wikimedia.beta.wmflabs.org]]
Thank you.--<font style="font-weight: bold; background-color: #FF0000; color: #ffffff;">[[User:Aldnonymous|AldNonymous]]</font><sup>[[User_talk:Aldnonymous|Bicara?]]</sup> 10:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


I do question whether this interwiki is actually worth keeping, according to [[Interwiki map/detailed table]] this interwiki had 4 uses in 2019, it's on a very niche topic and the project looks fairly dead - There have been no edits at all in the last 90 days. [[Special:Contributions/192.76.8.66|192.76.8.66]] 18:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
=== Wikimania ===
:One use. Recommend removal. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 23:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
{{LinkSummary|wikimania.wikimedia.org}}
: Also needs to be removed from interwiki.list. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
:: Updated to HTTPS. I'm inclined to keep this for historical value, since it's been around since 2001 and is used on the Nostalagia Wikipedia (!), but could be convinced to remove it. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 20:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
::: Updated further to https://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/$1. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 01:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
{{od}}
Interwiki.list was updated to HTTPS in [[gerrit:1026917]]. This can be resolved now unless we want to consider removal. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 17:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


=== Baden ===
* link: https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/$1
{{interwiki request

|action = update
* prefix: <code>wikimania:</code>
|status =

|interwiki = Baden
Just a request to add the "full version" of the name (wikimania:), to supplement the "short version" that already exists (wmania:). Thanks! [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 20:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
|stemurl = https://www.stadtwiki-baden-baden.de/wiki/

|stemurlsuffix = /
== Proposed removals ==
|item = Q106163975
{{messagebox
|wikidatastatus=done
|text=This section is for proposing that a prefix be disabled; please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section. Remember to '''explain why it should be disabled''', particularly in view of the difficulty involved in correcting any use of the prefix (to generate a list of pages to fix: [[toollabs:pirsquared/iw.php]]). Completed requests are marked with {{[[Template:done|done]]}} or {{[[Template:not done|not done]]}} and moved to the archives.
}}
}}


Update to https as it is supported. Again, I really do question whether we need an interwiki to a site that covers only one town - it doesn't seem like it would ever see much use. [[Special:Contributions/192.76.8.66|192.76.8.66]] 15:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
===Uncyclopedia===
: Updated. Has 15 total uses, most of which are files on Commons. Probably warrants removal. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 23:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't understand why Uncyclopedia was [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interwiki_map&diff=9458878&oldid=9445329 added] to this list. The text at the top says "Remember to specify why the prefix would be useful on a significant number of pages on Wikimedia Foundation projects", but I see no reason why anyone would need to link to a little-known humor wiki with no relevance to Wikimedia projects other than claiming to be a parody of Wikipedia. I notice this prefix was [https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interwiki_map&diff=1582709&oldid=1578570 removed] in 2009 after [[Talk:Interwiki map/Archives/2009-08#uncyclopedia|this discussion]]. It is also worth noting that there are two Uncyclopedias. The community forked in 2013, and a significant portion of it remained at uncyclopedia.wikia.com, which today is the more active site and ranks higher in search results. (See [[wikipedia:Uncyclopedia]], which links to both sites, and the number of active users listed on their [https://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Statistics statistics] [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Special:Statistics pages]. Also note that the Wikipedia article does not use the interwiki.) I know the Wikia-hosted version can still be linked to by [[wikia:uncyclopedia:pagename]], but having a dedicated prefix for either site and not the other seems like playing favorites.


=== Wikimedia Quality ===
I might also suggest that uncyclopedia.co is not the kind of site Wikimedia projects would want to be associated with. It is highly male-dominated, as can be seen from their [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Active_Admins active admins page] which lists several self-identified men but no self-identified women. One of those men wrote [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/{{urlencode:UnNews:If_I_hear_the_words_"sexual_harassment"_one_more_time...}} this] misguided opinion piece about the #MeToo movement. They also have an associated IRC channel #uncyclopedia where some really vile things have been said including [http://web.archive.org/web/20150315011834/http://www.chronarion.org:80/chirpy2/index.cgi?action=top Holocaust denial]. (Ctrl+F for "holocaust". The comment may have been a joke, but if so it's in bad taste. Bigotry is often framed as "jokes" to make it socially acceptable.) There's more I could say, but I don't think it would be appropriate here. I don't know if Wikimedia sites or the WMF care about the nature of the communities they give traffic to with interwiki links, but if they do, I hope they consider that this one conflicts with their principles. [[User:Ekips39|Ekips39]] ([[User talk:Ekips39|talk]]) 21:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
{{interwiki request

|action = Redirect..?
* Speedy Remove. It was removed per consensus, and I don't see in the archives any thread discussing and approving its readittion. &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 17:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
|status =
* Uncyclopedia was added to match the addition to the MediaWiki default interwiki map. I don't think the previous removal discussion is that relevant, given the site forking from Wikia, etc. I don't really follow the line of argumentation about being "male-dominated" (not true, but have you looked at Wikimedia projects?) or IRC comments (have you ever been in #wikipedia-en?) and so on. It *is* a humor wiki. (disclaimer: I'm affiliated with Uncyclomedia Foundation). [[User:Legoktm|Legoktm]] ([[User talk:Legoktm|talk]]) 04:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
|interwiki = quality
*:There's no reason for Uncyclopedia to be on the default interwiki map either. It has no relevance to any wiki other than those affiliated with it. Forking from Wikia does not make it not Uncyclopedia. As MarcoAurelio said, there was no thread approving its readdition; at least, I could not find one. I did find [[Talk:Interwiki map/Archives/2014#Uncyclopedia|this rejected request]].
|stemurl = https://quality.wikimedia.org/wiki
*:Of course I'm aware Wikimedia projects are male-dominated, but many members are aware and trying to work against it, and uncyclopedia.co is far more so as evidenced by the link I gave and by who actively edits there. Yes, I am a #wikipedia-en regular. I find it to be a very civilized place where comments like the ones I linked never occur ("the holocaust is a lie made up by the liberal jewish media cabal", "banging my mum is endless enjoyment", "[http://web.archive.org/web/20150315011745/http://www.chronarion.org:80/chirpy2/index.cgi?action=random If you were my fucktoy you wouldn't be semen covered, you'd be semen filled]", etc.). Behavior on #wikipedia-en is well regulated, and the channel has [[IRC/wikipedia/Guidelines|a set of guidelines]], unlike #uncyclopedia which [http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Special:WebChat has no rules at all]. Being a humor wiki does not excuse or explain the kind of conduct I have pointed to. But in any case, as I said, this site is not a useful interwiki link for Wikimedia or almost anything else. [[User:Ekips39|Ekips39]] ([[User talk:Ekips39|talk]]) 04:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
:::Let me get this straight... you want to remove a link to a group of about fifty wikis (as Uncyclopedia exists in multiple languages, across multiple communities) because someone said something you didn't like... not on the wiki, but on an IRC #channel? This looks to be a political ploy, not a legit attempt to apply established criteria. And yes, there was a discussion both when it was removed (as Wikia projects can already be accessed in a format like wikia:uncyclopedia:PageName) and when it was restored. Nothing has changed since then. [[User:K7L|K7L]] ([[User talk:K7L|talk]]) 03:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
:{{ping|Legoktm}} It's not a humor wiki, it's a rumors wiki, Please remove it from [[special:interwiki]]. --[[Special:Contributions/60.26.9.114|60.26.9.114]] 05:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
::It's a site focused on humor, not conspiracy theories or attacking people. Regardless, listing it in interwiki links isn't an endorsement of it's content. [[User:Vermont|Vermont]] ([[User talk:Vermont|talk]]) 10:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

=== Discontinue Wikinvest ===
All external links via this interwiki are useless now.
* The path is ignored, they all are directed to: https://www.sigfig.com/site/#/wikinvest-migration
* There is no free information available any longer, at least not without registration.
* See as brief example e.g. [[w:en:Price-weighted index]] both reference and external link.
* The platform is highly commercial and trying to persuade visitors to invest their money via this company. This is not what we request a platform to provide helpful information to our readers. We should not direct readers to a particular finance management company. ''The easiest way to manage & improve your investments ÷ Free online personal finance investment software''.
* It is not clear why they ever got an interwiki shortcut; the motivation for running Wikinvest has always been to catch people and make them invest money. See [[w:en:Wikinvest]].
Greetings --[[User:PerfektesChaos|PerfektesChaos]] ([[User talk:PerfektesChaos|talk]]) 19:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

:There are a lot of links to remove https://tools.wmflabs.org/pirsquared/iw.php?wikis=&iw=Wikinvest&hideclosed=on Would you suggest that there is a link expansion, and then mark as deadlinks, and leave the wikis to manage? Just removing the links is the other option. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 22:38, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

:: Apparently there is no content available, at least not for free, or put some hundred thousand bucks in as investment to become a silver card member.
:: Perhaps something is archived via the original expanded URL. No idea.
:: But yes, projects should get a notice and the old path as starting point for investigations, and they may proceed on their own decisions. Other sites or even wiki pages might be a replacement in some cases.
:: Greetings --[[User:PerfektesChaos|PerfektesChaos]] ([[User talk:PerfektesChaos|talk]]) 21:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
:::{{ping|PerfektesChaos}} What may be worthwhile is having a target page here at metawiki for all discontinued interwikis where the links have not been removed, and we are concerned about retaining the dead links. Suggest one page, with an anchor per site, and we change the interwiki to point to that static interwiki#anchor. Of course, if someone wishes to build a bot, or manually remove them, then fantastic. We can add some bot requests to wikis if we find value in that. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 10:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, good idea.
* I suggest a subpage: ''Interwiki map/Discontinued''
** Brief introduction in English, then sections per keyword.
** Each section would contain three items:
**# Recent URL pattern
**#* By <code>$1</code> the former URL can be reconstructed.
**# Date of discarding ''(fall 2018, here)''
**# Link to the archived proposal debate ''(this section here, but in archive; first archive, then change config)''
* URL change would mean:
** No <code>$1</code> any longer.
** Append <code>#wikinvest</code>
** Subpage URL.
* It is up to authors and communities how to deal with individual cases: Remove entirely, replace by other source, search web archives, mark as dead.
* One problem left open: They still appear on [[Special:Interwiki]] and might mislead some people. An additional database field <code>hide</code> would be nice; use by parser for link production, but treat as non-existent in all other cases. Flag might even generate the fallback URL directly
Best, --[[User:PerfektesChaos|PerfektesChaos]] ([[User talk:PerfektesChaos|talk]]) 13:24, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

: (+) If a <code>discontinued</code> flag is officially introduced, flagged keywords may be listed on [[Special:Interwiki]] with their last known URL pattern in a particular section, but usage will link to $wgInterwikiDiscontinuedURL pattern, if defined.
:: wgInterwikiDiscontinuedURL := <nowiki>https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki_map/Discontinued#$0</nowiki>
: The extension of interwiki extension started less than ten years ago, now by regular link rot more and more keywords will pass away in near future.
: Yours, --[[User:PerfektesChaos|PerfektesChaos]] ([[User talk:PerfektesChaos|talk]]) 13:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

===Botwiki===
This website is down, and according to [[phab:T115790]], has been repeatedly over the last several years (depending on how you interpret the last few comments in that bug report, it may have been down continuously for over two years by this point). It is only used a [https://tools.wmflabs.org/pirsquared/iw.php?wikis=&iw=botwiki&hideclosed=on few hundred times], and only around 5 of those are articles, plus a couple dozen or so translation subpages here on MetaWiki (though I counted just by scanning the list, so I may have missed some). <span class=nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ディノ<span style=color:#080>奴]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千?!]]」<sup>[[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 17:46, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
* {{ping|Snowolf}} as wiki owner. [[User:Quiddity|Quiddity]] ([[User talk:Quiddity|talk]]) 23:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
::I'd be curious as to what happened to the content which used to be on botwiki: as that project's been offline for a couple of years now, breaking the interwiki link. Did the info get moved to mw: or is it simply lost? [[User:K7L|K7L]] ([[User talk:K7L|talk]]) 03:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
*I note there's been no answer from {{ping|Snowolf}} yet (though by all accounts she's busy IRL, so someone should probably make a more concerted effort to get a hold of her?), and the site's still down. <span class=nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ディノ<span style=color:#080>奴]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千?!]]」<sup>[[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 21:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
*: I emailed him a couple of months ago regarding this but I've not no reply from him though. If the wiki has been down for some time I'd say we remove the link. &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 10:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
*I apologize for the lengthy delay in replying here. Botwiki has indeed been out of commission for several years. I shut down that hosting account a long time ago now, and never brought Botwiki back up. The entire database for it is overrun with the unwiedly amount of spam we had been experiencing, and I intended on cleaning stuff up before bringing it back. For a project with only a few hundred pages and only a handful of active or semi-active it was unmanageable to have many hundreds of new spam accounts per day. So between that and the fact that it was running on an ancient MediaWiki version, it always ended up pushed towards the bottom of the todo list -- I'm sorry. I am currently in a very busy period IRL, but I can explore bringing it up in May or June if there is need for me to do so. Alternatively, I could look at producing a dump of some kind. I'm open to any avenue that would be preferred (and I'm really bad at answering, I know -- I'm sorry MarcoAurelio). <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 18:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
**Keeping in mind I have no personal use for it myself, nor any history with it, I would say at this point that a dump would be fine given the site's been offline for several years and you don't have the free time to bring it back up and maintain it (I've poked around a bit at your user pages here and on Wikipedia, and it sounds like you've been short on personal time for years now, so I'm guessing this is a situation that also isn't likely to change for you any time soon). A dump would also allow someone else to run the site, if there was a desire for that at this point (if nothing else, if the contents of the wiki are of any importance to the WMF, they could toss it up as a read-only wiki similar to [[nostalgia:|Nostalgia]]). <span class=nowrap>「[[User:Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#00f>ディノ<span style=color:#080>奴]][[Special:Contributions/Dinoguy1000|<span style=color:#F90>千?!]]」<sup>[[User talk:Dinoguy1000#top|☎ Dinoguy1000]]</sup></span> 18:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
**: Read-only on 1.7.x should be very easy to do. Actually I guess could just disallow new account creations and that would do the trick -- I doubt the spambots would still keep track of their old passwords. I'll look into this maybe sometime in the next week and report back. <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 19:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

== Requests for updates ==
{{messagebox
|text=This section is for requesting update for an existing interwiki. This could be needed if your site's URL has changed. Please add new entries at the ''bottom'' of the section.
}}
}}
=== Doom Wiki ===
The original Doom Wiki is now at http://doomwiki.org/$1. Please replace the Wikia wiki interlink with the new url. [[User:Arianator with love|Arianator with love]] ([[User talk:Arianator with love|talk]]) 03:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)


I noticed this as an entry at [[w:Help:Interwiki linking#Interwiki linking from and within Wikimedia]], it's a closed wiki, all it gives you is a page with a manual redirect. Whatever way the {{((}}[[Template:Interwiki request|Interwiki request]]{{))}} template parses sort-of-kinda-internal URLs, it hates this one.
=== DMOZ and DMOZS ===
The DMOZ community is now live at curlie.org so please replace instances of "dmoztools.net" (a static mirror) with "curlie.org" (a live fork that continues the project). —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
: For the <code><nowiki>dmoz</nowiki></code> prefix, the target URL should be changed from <code><nowiki>http://dmoztools.net/$1</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>https://curlie.org/$1</nowiki></code> instead in order to make this change. (This is assuming that Curlie is a legitimate fork of DMOZ and that its replication of Web pages from DMOZ and/or dmoztools.net is in compliance with any licensing requirements.) --[[User:Elegie|Elegie]] ([[User talk:Elegie|talk]]) 06:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


It has a "longform" IW link - [[quality:|<nowiki>[[quality:]]</nowiki>]]
=== ForthFreak target URLs redirect to GitHub wiki ===
As of this writing, the <code><nowiki>ForthFreak</nowiki></code> prefix has the target URL <code><nowiki>http://wiki.forthfreak.net/index.cgi?$1</nowiki></code>. From what it appears, URLs that start with <code><nowiki>http://wiki.forthfreak.net/index.cgi?</nowiki></code> generate a {{w|HTTP 301|301 Moved Permanently}} redirect to https://github.com/ForthHub/ForthFreak/wiki/Forthfreak-wiki. For example, there are the URLs http://wiki.forthfreak.net/index.cgi?colorForth and http://wiki.forthfreak.net/index.cgi?MiniSpreadsheet. It might be useful to use the GitHub page as the target URL for the ForthFreak prefix, in order to provide increased privacy and security for users by using an HTTPS URL, and for eliminating the redirect. Another possibility might be to use a target URL such as <code><nowiki>https://github.com/ForthHub/ForthFreak/wiki/$1</nowiki></code>, to increase the chance that the URL for an existing wiki entry will be redirected to the corresponding wiki entry (assuming one exists) at the GitHub wiki. For example, there is a wiki entry on the GitHub page at https://github.com/ForthHub/ForthFreak/wiki/ForthSystems. --[[User:Elegie|Elegie]] ([[User talk:Elegie|talk]]) 05:57, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{ping|Elegie}}Looking at https://tools.wmflabs.org/pirsquared/iw.php?wikis=&iw=ForthFreak&hideclosed=on has me thinking that we would be better to just remove the interwiki link, it isn't being used. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 11:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)


Following the most relevant option at the redirect you end up at [[Wikiquality/Portal]] (actually located here on meta-wiki), which is itself a vestigial page with the {{((}}[[Template:Historical|historical]]{{))}} template applied.
===infosphere===
Can we please update <code>infosphere</code> to use <code>https:</code> instead of <code>http:</code>?


So, obviously not important, but maybe the target should be changed to save people the extra click.
Thank you, —<span style="text-shadow:0 0 .15em #900;color:#900">[[User:LLarson|LLarson]]</span> <small>([[User talk:LLarson|said]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/LLarson|done]])</small> 12:13, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:When I follow an existing http: link to the site it does not redirect me to an https: link. When I morph the http to https I get a browser warning that it is an insecure link. I would suggest that it is not fully compliant. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 14:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::{{Ping|billinghurst}} I tried multiple browsers on macOS, Windows, and iOS but wasn’t able to recreate your browser’s warning. My web console did list the website’s Creative Commons badge as being requested over HTTP,{{sup|[http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png 1]}} but if it is called, it is served over HTTPS.{{sup|[https://licensebuttons.net/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png 2]}} If that is what is causing your warning, I see user risk outweighed by benefits here. —<span style="text-shadow:0 0 .15em #900;color:#900">[[User:LLarson|LLarson]]</span>&nbsp;<small>([[User talk:LLarson|said]] &amp; [[Special:Contributions/LLarson|done]])</small> 15:59, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


[[User:One cookie|One cookie]] ([[User talk:One cookie|talk]]) 20:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
=== IRCS vs. IRC ===
Why is there no <code>ircs</code> in [[Special:Interwiki]]? Shouldn't <code>ircs</code> be preferred over <code>irc</code>, 'cause its secure? All [[Template:Channel]] transclusions are linking to insecure connections.
Two alternative proposals:
*Could the <code>ircs</code> protocol be added to the map creating 4 new prefixes based on the exiting prefixes irc, freenode, ircrc, rcirc?
*Alternatively, could the URLs of these prefixes just be changed to the ircs protocol (all listed servers do support IRCS, also all up-to date irc clients). This would eliminate all insecure <code>irc</code> links using interwiki, including thousands of Template:Channel transclusions.


:Why would we need a shorthand to link to a closed wiki that has [https://quality.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:AllPages basically no content]? —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 20:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks! --[[User:Ptolusque|Ptolusque]] ([[User talk:Ptolusque|talk]]) 09:44, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
::We don't, but that is what we have already. It exists, I'm not requesting that it be created.
::{{ping|Ptolusque}} there is IRC, have you misspoken, and need to amend? If you are asking why freenode is not available in secure IRC, probably because no one has requested it. Most direct requests that I have seen have been through their https interface. &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 11:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
::There's ''basically no content'' at the Special:AllPages link for the wiki because ''"this wiki has been closed '''and its content has been moved to meta.wikimedia.org'''"''. Some of the content you're looking for is at the correct address for the shortcut's target, [[Wikiquality/Portal|meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiquality/Portal]] - but, since most of the content created for the project was as articles for a mailing list, the bulk of it is at [[:listarchive:list/wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org/latest]].
:::Yes, misspelled. Corrected above. I'm asking why all irc servers provided in [[Special:Interwiki]] are not available in secure IRCS. Herby I request IRCS to be added or as replacement for irc. --[[User:Ptolusque|Ptolusque]] ([[User talk:Ptolusque|talk]]) 21:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
::The project ''was'' seen as important, enough so that it was given a shortcut link, and its link was used as one of the 29 examples of prefix codes included at [[w:Help:Interwiki linking]], so what we currently do actually have is a shorthand link which: has been used, can be found on pages of projects which are ''not'' closed and which will be seen by users, was functional when it was used, is now broken and points to a dead page.
* {{comment}} I asked [[User:Ptolusque|Ptolusque]] to come here and raise this issue from [[phab:T200151|Phabricator]] as I am unsure whether we should amend the existing links or add new ones. I do support using HTTPS of course. Best regards, &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 10:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
::The shortcut should either be fixed or removed from that list, but removing it from that list won't remove it from anywhere anyone's ever used it, where it will remain an annoying broken link! [[User:One cookie|One cookie]] ([[User talk:One cookie|talk]]) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
:::"The shortcut should either be fixed or removed from that list". 100% agreed. I'd lean toward remove, as the quality wiki was closed a ''long'' time ago and I doubt there are any/many links, but that can be checked. Thorough response: thanks. —[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 17:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
{{od}}
I've fixed the template above. Don't feel comfortable removing this because we currently have a convention that each Wikimedia project has an interwiki link, which I don't want to break. I.e [[aa:]] exists too despite pointing nowhere. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 23:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


=== Wikia ===
=== ===
{{interwikicheck|dict}}
Maybe Wikia should change from http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1 to http://www.wikia.com/wiki/$1 but more testing is strongly recommended. I have only tested one page at two Wikia wikis. Both are broken for me now and the change would fix one but not the other. It came up at [[w:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Template:TardisIndexFile]] where my tests are shown. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 23:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
{{interwikicheck|dictionary}}
:{{Re|PrimeHunter}} thanks for the note, can you provide any documentation from wikia about what changes they are making to their naming convention? — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 23:59, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
::I don't edit at Wikia and haven't seen any documentation. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 00:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:::I found http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Help:Links#Interwiki_links which says: ''To link to a page on a different community, enter "w:c:" followed by the domain of that wiki, followed by the page's name''. This indicates http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1. Trying this, both http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:tardis:Davros and http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:harrypotter:Hermione_Granger work for me via redirects. Trying http://www.wikia.com/wiki/$1 without w:c:, http://www.wikia.com/wiki/tardis:Davros works for me while http://www.wikia.com/wiki/harrypotter:Hermione_Granger fails. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 00:24, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
::::{{re|PrimeHunter}} thanks for the note, to be clear this will be a change of:
*FROM: <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1</nowiki></code>
*TO: <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code>
:::: — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 00:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:::::Yes, that is currently my best guess. I haven't tried other Wikia links or different devices. At [[:w:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 169#Links to Harry Potter wiki]], Wikia behaved differently with different user agents. There may be four affected interwiki map entries. They currently say:
* Wikia http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1
* WikiaSite http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1
* Wikicities http://www.wikia.com/wiki/$1
* Wikicity http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1
:::::I haven't examined how WikiaSite:, Wikicities: and Wikicity: are used and whether they would all be better as <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code>. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 01:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
* {{done}} Wikia above is done, someone will need to test the others and let us know. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 14:11, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
::I have now tested the use of many Wikia wikis in the English Wikipedia. The already made Wikia change to <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code> will fix all tested links made with Wikia:. They are all broken with the old <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:$1</nowiki></code>. WikiaSite and Wikicity need the same change to <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code>. All tested links are broken and will be fixed by this change. Wikicities needs a change from <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/$1</nowiki></code> to <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:$1</nowiki></code>. All tested links are broken and will be fixed by this. Note that Wikicities does not currently include c: and should not start doing it. It should only add w:. This is because all tested existing uses are adapted to the current value without c: so they add c: in the wikilink like [[wikicities:c:Smallville:Spirit]]. The suggested change will produce the working http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:Smallville:Spirit instead of the broken http://www.wikia.com/wiki/c:Smallville:Spirit. In summary, these should be the new values:
*{{done}} Wikia <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code> (already done)
*{{done}} WikiaSite <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code>
*{{done}} Wikicities <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:$1</nowiki></code>
*Wikicity <code><nowiki>http://www.wikia.com/wiki/w:c:$1</nowiki></code>
::All tests were with Firefox on Windows 10. [[User:PrimeHunter|PrimeHunter]] ([[User talk:PrimeHunter|talk]]) 17:18, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
:{{done}} all updates made. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 14:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
::[[phab:T207596]] opened to sync. — [[User:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#FF9933; font-weight:bold; font-family:monotype;">xaosflux</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Xaosflux|<span style="color:#009933;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 14:41, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


Currently points to a third-party dictionary. I just cleaned up several uses on enwiki that clearly intended to point to Wiktionary instead, and I would suggest these interwikis be updated in the same way to reduce confusion. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 02:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
=== Bibliowiki ===
: Dictionary is also in the default interwiki map for new wikis (https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/maintenance/interwiki.list). [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 18:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
This site moved to https://wikilivres.org in last month. The site has not maintained complete link functionality from the previous https://biblio.wiki address. The root url will redirect, and occasionally other links will as well but it mostly just timeouts. This is breaking several external link templates that use this interwiki link. I don't see any change to the site content, the name the only change. [[User:Frayae|Frayae]] ([[User talk:Frayae|talk]]) 19:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
:: I updated these to HTTPS in the mean time. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 17:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

{{ping|Xaosflux}} The site has quite clearly become wikilivres again as was its name from 2006-2017. Could you update this? [[User:Frayae|Frayae]] ([[User talk:Frayae|talk]]) 20:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

: Note, this is both the <code>wikilivres</code> and the <code>bibliowiki</code> prefixes. &mdash;[[User:Beleg Tâl|Beleg Tâl]] ([[User talk:Beleg Tâl|talk]]) 14:52, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

:: {{ok}}; [[Special:Diff/18733804]] &mdash;[[User:MarcoAurelio|MarcoAurelio]] ([[User talk:MarcoAurelio|talk]]) 19:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

=== ISSN redirects to HTTPS ===
ISSN: <nowiki>https://www.worldcat.org/issn/$1</nowiki> [[issn:0021-6925]]

Note: Some ISSN URLs, such as http://www.worldcat.org/issn/0021-6925, generate a 301 redirect to an HTTPS URL that generates a 303 redirect to another HTTPS URL. At the same time, there are other ISSN URLs, such as http://www.worldcat.org/issn/1810-9047, that only generate a 301 redirect to an HTTPS URL. The change specified above should cover both situations. --[[User:Elegie|Elegie]] ([[User talk:Elegie|talk]]) 09:56, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

=== HTTPS for freedomdefined ===
Please update <code>freedomdefined:</code> to https://freedomdefined.org/$1 to use encrypted connection. It has a three-month Let’s Encrypt certificate valid from last Sunday, so it’s a fast catch! :) Hopefully they configured the update script correctly and it will still work in May. —[[User:Tacsipacsi|Tacsipacsi]] ([[User talk:Tacsipacsi|talk]]) 20:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


== Troubleshooting ==
== Troubleshooting ==
Line 336: Line 346:
}}
}}


=== imdb ===
Interwiki has diverged between the map here and [https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/maintenance/interwiki.list interwiki.list]. Interwiki.list currently has one "imdb" prefix going to http://www.imdb.com/find?q=$1&tt=on . Meta interwiki map currently has several (IMDbName, IMDbTitle, etc.). Presumably one of these should be updated to match the other one, but which? [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style="color:#800000">it has begun</sub>]] 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
== Other discussions ==
== Other discussions ==
=== When to accept or reject a request ===
I would like to suggest to better explain to the users how the accept or reject decisions are made and in what time frame. As you can see from the list above, there are several requests lying here since months (in some cases for more than an year) and it is not clear (at least to me) if and when a request will be accepted or rejected.<br />At the top of the page it is written ''Admins, please allow consensus to form (or at least no objections to be raised over a period of a '''few days''')'', but this is clearly not the case as months are passing, not days.<br />So I would say that either the approval process is not working as expected, or it is not explained in a clear way to the reader. [[User:Lucamauri|LucaMauri]] ([[User talk:Lucamauri|talk]]) 14:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
:I would say that the text reflected the early days, not the current days where the requirements of the wikis are more specific, and where we have less requirement for change. I don't think that the process is wrong, it is simply that those cases you highlight don't demonstrate a consensus to add, and it is be better instruction to proponents that needs revision. Requests here need the input of the wikis where the links will be used. I would suggest that these proponents need to place their request here, then announce their requests at those wikis where they expect the uses to occur, so that the broader community can reach that consensus here.<p>Clear cases of demonstrated use, especially internal use, have been approved. Low use, uncertain requests have sat here awaiting a consensus that the value for addition exists.<p>In my opinion, administrators are here to undertake the addition/change/removal after a consensus has been reached, not to generate the discussion to form a consensus. We could close requests as not done, if they haven't got that clear consensus, or we can leave them open, as has been the practice. [The community decides where we are going, administrators are the conduit to implementation.] &nbsp;— [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''<span style="font-size:smaller">[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]</span>'' 23:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
::Thanks, I see your point and understand your reasons. But then again, information to the users needs to be updated.<br />First of all: who is in charge of reviewing documentation? Is this something we users should take care of, or an Administrator is better suited for?<br />Secondly, how we define ''consensus''? Do we need 10 <code><nowiki>{{support}}</nowiki></code>? Or 20? Or 1.000? And how to weight them against any number of <code><nowiki>{{oppose}}</nowiki></code>?<br />I think we need at least a general guideline to know how to approach a proposal and gather supporters.--[[User:Lucamauri|LucaMauri]] ([[User talk:Lucamauri|talk]]) 11:07, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

=== rendering/distinction between internal and external links ===
Is there a way to introduce distinct rendering for the entries here? Before the interwiki map was opened to allow prefixes for external sites, readers could visually clearly distinguish between an internal links (WMF projects) and external links, but now that is not possible anymore. This imho rather confusing and also counterintuitive to the rules in some/many wikipedias, which allow external links only in certain section and not the article's main text. Not to mention that some if the entries here somewhat violate the usual criteria for external links of some wikipedias as well.--[[User:Kmhkmh|Kmhkmh]] ([[User talk:Kmhkmh|talk]]) 13:33, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
:The rendering of interwiki links is controlled by the CSS class <code>.extiw</code>: in our MediaWiki installation we decided to show a small sunflower icon (WikiMedia logo) next to any interwiki link and we managed to do this simply adding a <code>background-image</code> property to the class in the CSS. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, there is not an easy way to differentiate between different sites. The general idea would be to add a second class – beside <code>.extiw</code> – to the links identifying the prefix of the website where the link points to: then it could be possible to customize every links in a similar way as the <code><nowiki><li></nowiki></code> elements in the sidebar. This should be suggested as a change to MediWiki codebase, but I haven't found the time to do so, yet. --[[User:Lucamauri|LucaMauri]] ([[User talk:Lucamauri|talk]]) 12:24, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

=== Interwiki link search tool ===
Hey, I just randomly decided to check this talk page and realized that the tool is down (and probably has been down for quite some time). I haven't logged into tool labs at all in several years so it's kind of a miracle that it was even up in 2018. Anyone know how I can get it back up? [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 18:59, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

==Instructions to Meta-Wiki administrators==
* Interwiki prefixes are case-''in''sensitive
* Following some updates to [[Interwiki map]], please <span class="plainlinks">[https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/edit/form/22/?title=Please%20update%20the%20interwiki%20cache lodge an update site request in Phabricator]</span> (replace the description field with something along: "Please update the interwiki cache following on-wiki updates on Meta-Wiki. Thank you.").

=== Update logs ===
* <span class="plainlinks">[//tools.wmflabs.org/sal/production?p=0&q=interwiki Logging of interwiki map update]</span> (interwiki search, Feb 2016 onwards)
* <span class="plainlinks">[//tools.wmflabs.org/sal/production?p=0&q=interwiki.php Logging of interwiki map update]</span> (interwiki.php search, Feb 2016 onwards)
Due to limited search functionality, you will need to check both log searches.

=== Current map in the configuration ===
* You can check {{plainlinks|1=https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/plugins/gitiles/operations/mediawiki-config/+/master/wmf-config/interwiki.php|2=here}} the current map as existing on the Wikimedia configuration files.

{{RF}}

<!-- WARNING : Use the template as it collects all the info needed and make your requests in the proper section. Don't add them under this line-->


[[Category:Interwiki map]]

Latest revision as of 00:23, 13 July 2024

The interwiki map is used by the MediaWiki software to add, remove or update interwiki link prefixes (such as [[w:blah]] to "blah" on Wikipedia). Any Meta-Wiki administrator can edit the interwiki map at Interwiki map/list. It is synced to the Wikimedia cluster upon request through the completion of a Phabricator ticket. Please post comments to the appropriate section (Proposed additions, Proposed removals, Requests for updates, Troubleshooting, or Other discussions); read the boxes at the top of each for an explanation. Completed requests are moved to the archives.

{{interwiki request}} can be used to assist in the making and managing requests.

Instructions to Meta-Wiki administrators

Tools

  • You may use global search to look for URL and interwiki link use. Suggest the use of {{interwiki request}} when making requests for removals and updates.

Current map in the configuration

Wikidata

Wikidata stores the mapped interwiki code as an item for domains in the interwiki map using interwiki prefix at Wikimedia (P6720). Additions, removals and updates should be noted against the corresponding item in Wikidata. Also to note the direction at Complex constraint violations/P6720

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days.

Proposed additions[edit]

The Interwiki Map exists to allow a more efficient syntax for linking between wikis, and thus promote the cooperation and proliferation of wikis and free content.

This section is for proposing a new interwiki link prefix. Interwiki prefixes should be reserved for websites that would be useful on a significant number of pages ({{LinkSummary}} can help). Websites useful only to a few pages should be linked to with the usual external link syntax. Please don't propose additions of sites with too few pages or that contain copyright infringing content, such as YouTube. As a guide, sites considered for inclusion would:

  1. be useful on a significant number of pages
  2. provide clear and relevant use to the Wikimedia projects, including the purpose of the site
  3. be trusted not to encourage spam links being added to the Wikimedia projects
  4. not contain malware
  5. be expected to remain working for a long time in the future and not suffer from link rot

Add new entries at the bottom of the section. When requesting a new prefix, please explain why it would be useful keeping the above in mind. Admins, please allow consensus to form (or at least no objections to be raised over a period of a few days) before adding new entries, as once added they are hard to remove from the many copies around the world. Before adding a new entry to the interwiki map, use this tool to check whether any existing page names conflict with the proposed prefix.

Requests for removal should be submitted on the talk page in the removals section and will be decided on by a Meta admin.

Fandom[edit]



Interwiki request: new

Status:    In progress

An interwiki for Fandom currently exists as wikia: and its alias wikiasite: (along with specific interwikis to certain Fandom-hosted wikis), but there is no alias named "Fandom". Since the site has been renamed, I suggest allowing the new terminology to be used in links as well, to avoid confusion. Thanks, EpicPupper (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

@EpicPupper: that seems to be half a story.

I have not buried myself into the history of fandom/wikia ins and outs, so please take a step back and look to concisely re-explain what has happened, what it needing to be achieved, and any politics that are at play so the community can make an informed decision.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Billinghurst, sure, here is some more information about the rename. In 2016, Wikia, a wiki hosting platform founded by Jimmy Wales and Angela Beesley Starling, underwent a major rebranding effort and changed its name to Fandom powered by Wikia 1. The name change was announced in a blog post on the Wikia website, which stated that the new name better reflected the platform's focus on communities and fan-created content. In a series of later changes from 2019-2021, all wikis migrated from wikia.org domains to fandom.com domains, and the Wikia branding was stripped completely 2. These changes were mostly uncontroversial and there was little negative feedback from the Fandom community following them. (Most opposers softened their tone a couple of years after the transition). Even if the community largely did not support these changes, that is irrelevant in this situation as "Fandom" is ultimately the official name of the website. Hope that helps! I think this change is relatively minor as it is merely adding an alias to the existing link, not a completely new one. EpicPupper (talk) 06:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Fandom is a generic noun - could that be a problem? "fandomcom", "fandomdotcom" or "fandomwiki" would be more specific. whym (talk) 11:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Looking back, my comment above doesn't sound very meaningful. Let me try again. What I'm uneasy about is that this proposal is to replace a proper noun ("Wikia") to a generic noun which happens to be trademarked ("Fandom"). The change will increase ambiguity. It looks like when English Wikipedia moved the article, they added a disambiguation, probably because "fandom" is too ambiguous: en:Wikiaen:Fandom (website). whym (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't see the issue that you're trying to solve here and I don't see the ambiguity. If someone is making an interwiki link with the "fandom" prefix it's obvious that they're trying to link to the website containing a massive wiki farm, they're not going to be trying to link to a music album, a documentary or the abstract concept of "a group of fans". 192.76.8.66 16:31, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Concur with 192. I would oppose FandomSite or any alternatives as I believe that they are unnecessary. Frostly (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • wikia • global-search <= high level of usage, still pertinent link
  • wikiasite • global-search <= high level of usage, still pertinent link
  • fandom • global-search <- noting that existing use may indicate that this is a namespace name, not that such perturb us

 — billinghurst sDrewth 00:15, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@EricPupper: Why do you have namespace codes w:c: in the proposed prefix ? Can you please provide some sample landing targets? Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
[[w:c:wikiname:Pagename]] is how you link from one Fandom wiki to another.[1] MSMST1543 (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
https://about.fandom.com/about says "over 40 million content pages in over 80 languages on 250,000 wikis". The page "The Joker" in the wiki "batman" is at https://batman.fandom.com/wiki/The_Joker. We cannot generate such a url directly with "batman" and "The Joker" in different places so we rely on redirects at Fandom. These both work currently:
I don't know whether both forms work for all Fandom wikis and will continue to work. Considering they ask their own users to write w:c: at [2], I guess it's safest to use that form. We already say https://community.fandom.com/wiki/w:c:$1 for both wikia:, WikiaSite: and Wikicity:, and I haven't heard complaints about broken links. The proposal is simply to add one more prefix for this. The site has been called Fandom and located at fandom.com for years so it seems reasonable. Four prefixes for the same site is a lot but considering their size and Fandom branding, I don't think we should worry about having a fourth prefix. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:15, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm still not sure if the new name is recognized well as a website name, without adding some sort of disambiguation. "Wikia" had 13 years (2006-2019), while "Fandom" had 8 years (2016-2014), according to en:Fandom (website). Maybe revisit in a few years? whym (talk) 10:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
I should have written 2016-2024 instead of 2016-2014. Sorry if that was confusing. whym (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Interwiki.list is behind even the Fandom updates. I'll handle that, but any further changes here should probably be propogated there. * Pppery * it has begun 18:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
This looks fine to add to me. I'll submit it though code review to update interwiki.list first, though. * Pppery * it has begun 19:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
This was added to interwiki.list. Now fine to add to Meta as well. I agree "fandom" by itself is clear enough. * Pppery * it has begun 05:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Several frequently used sites on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

The following websites are very widely used on Commons as part of authority control, based on the Wikidata properties OCLC control number (P243), ISNI (P213) and Library of Congress authority ID (P244); by creating interwiki prefixes for them, we can link to them using interwiki instead of external link syntax, which is better for the database (see Commons discussion and T343131). --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Interwiki request templates

Interwiki request: new

Status:    Done
wikidata status:   Done

Interwiki request: new

Status:    Done
wikidata status:   Done

Interwiki request: new

Status:    Done
wikidata status:   Done

Added as lofc. * Pppery * it has begun 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. * Pppery * it has begun 15:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Miraheze[edit]



Interwiki request: new

Status:    In progress

Previously discussed in 2019, 2022 and 2023. The major reason against it is it is run by John F. Lewis, a WMF-banned user; this is no longer true since control of Miraheze has beed handed to another US entity (and John has resigned in March 2023). So we may reconsider it.--GZWDer (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Is it being sufficiently used to be reconsidered? While the ban aspect may be a consideration, the primary consideration is that it is needed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Based on LinkSearch I see enough uses. I won't add this myself since I'm a contributor to Miraheze, but an addition is warranted. * Pppery * it has begun 00:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
But we definitely should wait until Miraheze decides whether to rename itself to WikiTide first, so we don't have to go through this process again if they decide to. * Pppery * it has begun 19:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
It looks like the plan to rebrand has been "Indefinitely postponed", so this should be good to go. * Pppery * it has begun 17:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia API Portal[edit]

Interwiki request: new

Status:    On hold

The Wikimedia API Portal is a wiki that documents various APIs around Wikimedia projects. It seems to make sense to not display them as external links. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Denny (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I suggest wmapi. Nardog (talk) 12:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Would recommend waiting for the outcome of T358303 first. * Pppery * it has begun 00:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

shoutwiki[edit]



Included in default interwiki map as shoutwiki:. ShoutWiki is a wiki farm hosting over 13,000 wikis, most licensed under CC BY-SA. Top 40 Wikipedias have over 500 links to them. Any wiki can be reached using link http://www.shoutwiki.com/wiki/w:subdomain:page. 01miki10 (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Comment Comment - If we are making an interwiki for this, then we might use one for mw:Miraheze too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LightningComplexFire (talk) 18:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Miraheze is unlikely to be added per Talk:Interwiki_map/Archives/2019#Miraheze. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
This section was archived on a request by:  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Restored from archive since this was archived without resolution. Either it should be removed from the default interwiki map or it should be added to the local one - it's bizarre for something to be in the default map but not the local one. No opinion on which. * Pppery * it has begun 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Leaning toward "add here" since there seem to be hundreds to thousands of uses. * Pppery * it has begun 00:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed removals[edit]

This section is for proposing that a prefix be disabled; please add new entries at the bottom of the section. Remember to explain why it should be disabled, particularly in view of the difficulty involved in correcting any use of the prefix (to generate a list of pages to fix: toollabs:pirsquared/iw.php). Please add {{Interwikicheck|interwiki code}} to top of the new section.

Interwiki map entries should generally be removed if the site (or the specific part of the site being linked to) is dead, broken, no longer hosts the content that was intended to be linked to. Legacy interwiki prefixes that never had any non-trivial uses at all can also be removed.

Interwikis that would otherwise be removed but had too many uses to clean up may be repointed to Interwiki map/discontinued.

When removing a prefix, also check if it's in interwiki.list (the default interwikis added by the installer when a new MediaWiki wiki is installed). That file is managed via Gerrit.

Completed requests are marked with {{done}} or {{not done}} and moved to the archives.

wmve[edit]

Interwiki request: removal

Status:    On hold

Dead, attempting to access this site results in an NXDOMAIN error. According to Interwiki map/detailed table this has/had hundreds of uses. I suggest remapping this to point at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Venezuela, to match what has been done with a number of other dead chapter sites. 192.76.8.66 16:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Multiple uses, would need to be remapped with explanation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is no longer a nxdomain, it's now a wordpress site saying "this site is under maintenance". Not sure what to do here. * Pppery * it has begun 22:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! The site is under maintenance, due to a failed provider's change. The chapter isn't dead. We're working to solve it. Thanks! --Ybsen lucero (talk) 10:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

aquariumwiki[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress

This is a tricky one. The wiki it points to is overrun by spambots, but it does still have some useful content, and is used in a bunch of places. We could just take no action. * Pppery * it has begun 03:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

git[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress

Conflicts with language code. See phab:T360792. Has 700 uses so cleanup would be a pain, and this is a very theoretical issue and probably not going to come up, so feel free to decline this, but putting it here for the record. * Pppery * it has begun 04:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

zum[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress
  • related Wikidata item:

Conflicts with language code. See phab:T360792. Has 100 uses so cleanup would be a pain, and this is a very theoretical issue and probably not going to come up, so feel free to decline this, but putting it here for the record. * Pppery * it has begun 04:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

aew[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress
  • related Wikidata item:

Conflicts with language code. See phab:T360792. Relatively low use so not sure this meets the criteria for an interwiki anyway and may warrant total removal. * Pppery * it has begun 04:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

This also conflicts with All Elite Wrestling shows (I fixed three different articles that intended to link to that) and the target site is largely dead. Now definitely in favor of removal, but ideally someone who speaks Arabic would to clean up the remaining uses first. * Pppery * it has begun 21:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

twl[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress
  • related Wikidata item:

Conflicts with language code. See phab:T360792. Surprisingly few uses so suggest renaming to something longer. * Pppery * it has begun 04:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:The Wikipedia Library#Rename twl interwiki. * Pppery * it has begun 21:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

PokeWiki[edit]

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress

Interwiki request: remove

Status:    In progress

Per /Archives/2023#PokeWiki, it's worth considering removal of both of these interwikis. * Pppery * it has begun 15:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

omegawiki[edit]

Interwiki request: removal

Status:    In progress

Dead site. Only one use from 2017 anyway. * Pppery * it has begun 00:30, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

wikipapers[edit]

Interwiki request: removal

Status:    In progress

Dead site. Probably has enough uses to warrant an entry on Interwiki map/discontinued * Pppery * it has begun 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

scramble[edit]

Interwiki request: removal

Status:    In progress

No longer seems to host a wiki. This could become just https://scramble.nl/$1 but given the few uses and the fact that nobody seemingly noticed I would delete it instead. * Pppery * it has begun 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

communityscheme[edit]

Interwiki request: removal

Status:    In progress

Zero uses per global-search, pattern looks fixably broken (can be fixed to http://community.schemewiki.org/?$1). But if nobody uses the interwiki and it's been broken for who-knows-how-long then what's the point? * Pppery * it has begun 01:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requests for updates[edit]

This section is for requesting update for an existing interwiki. This could be needed if your site's URL has changed. Please add new entries at the bottom of the section.

When updating a prefix, also check if it's in interwiki.list (the default interwikis added by the installer when a new MediaWiki wiki is installed). That file is managed via Gerrit.

HammondWiki[edit]



HammondWiki • global-search

Current URL pattern

http://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/index.php3?$1

Proposed URL pattern

https://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/index.php3?$1

This site supports https, so it would probably be a good idea for the interwiki mapping to be updated to use it.

I do question whether this interwiki is actually worth keeping, according to Interwiki map/detailed table this interwiki had 4 uses in 2019, it's on a very niche topic and the project looks fairly dead - There have been no edits at all in the last 90 days. 192.76.8.66 18:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

One use. Recommend removal.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:30, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also needs to be removed from interwiki.list. * Pppery * it has begun 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Updated to HTTPS. I'm inclined to keep this for historical value, since it's been around since 2001 and is used on the Nostalagia Wikipedia (!), but could be convinced to remove it. * Pppery * it has begun 20:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Updated further to https://www.dairiki.org/HammondWiki/$1. * Pppery * it has begun 01:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
Interwiki.list was updated to HTTPS in gerrit:1026917. This can be resolved now unless we want to consider removal. * Pppery * it has begun 17:10, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Baden[edit]

Interwiki request: update

Status:    In progress

Update to https as it is supported. Again, I really do question whether we need an interwiki to a site that covers only one town - it doesn't seem like it would ever see much use. 192.76.8.66 15:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Updated. Has 15 total uses, most of which are files on Commons. Probably warrants removal. * Pppery * it has begun 23:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Quality[edit]

Interwiki request: Redirect..?

Status:    In progress
  • related Wikidata item: [[d:Special:EntityPage/{{{ITEM}}}|{{{ITEM}}}]]

I noticed this as an entry at w:Help:Interwiki linking#Interwiki linking from and within Wikimedia, it's a closed wiki, all it gives you is a page with a manual redirect. Whatever way the {{Interwiki request}} template parses sort-of-kinda-internal URLs, it hates this one.

It has a "longform" IW link - [[quality:]]

Following the most relevant option at the redirect you end up at Wikiquality/Portal (actually located here on meta-wiki), which is itself a vestigial page with the {{historical}} template applied.

So, obviously not important, but maybe the target should be changed to save people the extra click.

One cookie (talk) 20:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why would we need a shorthand to link to a closed wiki that has basically no content? —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
We don't, but that is what we have already. It exists, I'm not requesting that it be created.
There's basically no content at the Special:AllPages link for the wiki because "this wiki has been closed and its content has been moved to meta.wikimedia.org". Some of the content you're looking for is at the correct address for the shortcut's target, meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiquality/Portal - but, since most of the content created for the project was as articles for a mailing list, the bulk of it is at listarchive:list/wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org/latest.
The project was seen as important, enough so that it was given a shortcut link, and its link was used as one of the 29 examples of prefix codes included at w:Help:Interwiki linking, so what we currently do actually have is a shorthand link which: has been used, can be found on pages of projects which are not closed and which will be seen by users, was functional when it was used, is now broken and points to a dead page.
The shortcut should either be fixed or removed from that list, but removing it from that list won't remove it from anywhere anyone's ever used it, where it will remain an annoying broken link! One cookie (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
"The shortcut should either be fixed or removed from that list". 100% agreed. I'd lean toward remove, as the quality wiki was closed a long time ago and I doubt there are any/many links, but that can be checked. Thorough response: thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I've fixed the template above. Don't feel comfortable removing this because we currently have a convention that each Wikimedia project has an interwiki link, which I don't want to break. I.e aa: exists too despite pointing nowhere. * Pppery * it has begun 23:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

dict, dictionary[edit]

dict • global-search dictionary • global-search

Currently points to a third-party dictionary. I just cleaned up several uses on enwiki that clearly intended to point to Wiktionary instead, and I would suggest these interwikis be updated in the same way to reduce confusion. * Pppery * it has begun 02:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dictionary is also in the default interwiki map for new wikis (https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki/blob/master/maintenance/interwiki.list). * Pppery * it has begun 18:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
I updated these to HTTPS in the mean time. * Pppery * it has begun 17:12, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Troubleshooting[edit]

This section is for comments related to problems or corrections with the interwiki map (such as incorrect syntax or entries not functioning). This is not the section to request that a prefix be disabled (see Proposed removals above).

imdb[edit]

Interwiki has diverged between the map here and interwiki.list. Interwiki.list currently has one "imdb" prefix going to http://www.imdb.com/find?q=$1&tt=on . Meta interwiki map currently has several (IMDbName, IMDbTitle, etc.). Presumably one of these should be updated to match the other one, but which? * Pppery * it has begun 19:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Other discussions[edit]