Proposals for closing projects/Closure of English Wikipedia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Support: merge |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*'''Oppose''' Sure, it doesn't have enough edits, but that's not a reason to close. A bot could bring the count up to 360 trillion easily. [[User:Algebraist|Algebraist]] 14:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' Sure, it doesn't have enough edits, but that's not a reason to close. A bot could bring the count up to 360 trillion easily. [[User:Algebraist|Algebraist]] 14:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose''' Rename it to "simple English" and close the other one because of redundancy. --[[User:FritzG|FritzG]] 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' Rename it to "simple English" and close the other one because of redundancy. --[[User:FritzG|FritzG]] 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
* '''Oppose''', this project should not be closed because we should focus on the proposal of Closure of Meta first. --[[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] 15:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Foot notes== |
==Foot notes== |
Revision as of 15:09, 1 April 2009
I can name a gazillion numbers bigger than 2.8 million. There's 3 million, 4 million, 5 million... And 416 is so tiny compared to 2.8 million that it's not worth being compared to larger numbers. Hardly worth anything, really... 296.5 million edits may seem big, but there are still numbers way bigger than it - have y'all heard of the number 360 trillion?
Support
Sahmeditor 13:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC) As the one who proposed
- Support Jimbo Wales once insulted my mother. --Closedmouth 14:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support And the infidels shall have the righteous shunned, the glorious proposal removed. But the righteous shall prevail... in a few decades or so. Wctaiwan 14:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Needs MOAR desu Antonio Lopez (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support per nom. Maybe move the valuable content to the incubator wiki. --Thogo (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Support - "valuable content"? What "valuable content"?! Nobody speaks English anymore, anyway. John Carter 14:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- this would free up some time. Melodia 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Strong Support--Seha 14:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- support Mostly Per Thogo , We admins on Incubator feel a bit bored .Though we have much bigger projects in incubator but dealing with tiny wikis such enwiki wouldn't be tough --Mardetanha talk 14:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- I don't like English--1j1z2 14:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- I hate English--FireJackey 14:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Strong[1] Support -- English wikipedia is a waste! Better to reserve the host for wikimedia commons! -- Meisam 14:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support - the few people there seem to be badly behaved to me.... While not fluent at English it is my language & I'm not keen on it. --Herby talk thyme 14:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Tengo gusto de inglés, apenas no en Wikipedia. --Neskaya 15:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- English is useless.--Gzdavidwong 15:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Merge with German Wikipedia - close enough.--Scott MacDonald 15:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose Sure, it doesn't have enough edits, but that's not a reason to close. A bot could bring the count up to 360 trillion easily. Algebraist 14:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Rename it to "simple English" and close the other one because of redundancy. --FritzG 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose, this project should not be closed because we should focus on the proposal of Closure of Meta first. --Bencmq 15:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Foot notes
- ↑ Of of its users called me idiot!