Jump to content

Proposals for closing projects/Closure of English Wikipedia: Difference between revisions

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: Line 24:
*'''Oppose''' Sure, it doesn't have enough edits, but that's not a reason to close. A bot could bring the count up to 360 trillion easily. [[User:Algebraist|Algebraist]] 14:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Sure, it doesn't have enough edits, but that's not a reason to close. A bot could bring the count up to 360 trillion easily. [[User:Algebraist|Algebraist]] 14:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' Rename it to "simple English" and close the other one because of redundancy. --[[User:FritzG|FritzG]] 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''' Rename it to "simple English" and close the other one because of redundancy. --[[User:FritzG|FritzG]] 14:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
* '''Oppose''', this project should not be closed because we should focus on the proposal of Closure of Meta first. --[[User:Bencmq|Bencmq]] 15:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


==Foot notes==
==Foot notes==

Revision as of 15:09, 1 April 2009

I can name a gazillion numbers bigger than 2.8 million. There's 3 million, 4 million, 5 million... And 416 is so tiny compared to 2.8 million that it's not worth being compared to larger numbers. Hardly worth anything, really... 296.5 million edits may seem big, but there are still numbers way bigger than it - have y'all heard of the number 360 trillion?

Support

Sahmeditor 13:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC) As the one who proposed[reply]

Oppose

Foot notes

  1. Of of its users called me idiot!