Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
![]() |
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Global rollback for Kostas20142
- Global user: Kostas20142 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 2 April 2020 22:09 UTC
I have been active (again) for the last few months in xwiki patrolling, and having this permission would be useful for me. I am a rollbacker in various projects and Wikidata sysop (since early march). I have read and understood the relevant policies. --Kostas20142 (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Checking their contributions, there is more than sufficient activity, trustworthiness, and responsibility to grant the tool. Thank you for volunteering, Vermont (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support No concerns - contribs look good and their activity is consistent enough for the tool. Although recent, trusted admin on a larger project. ~riley (talk) 23:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support, per above. Of course! Did a good work, trusted and active user. Thanks for your work. —Sgd. Hasley 00:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Support per ~riley. -- CptViraj (📧) 02:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support, no concerns. Competent candidate. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ talk ] 03:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Support --Minorax (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Sure, helpful, active xwiki, reverts seems good, trusted in several projects, admin in a content project. No red flags for me, looks good to go.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Support--𐐎ℹ𝕜ⅈ𝕭𝒂𝕪ⅇ𝕣 👤💬 10:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Support An active user in crosswiki activity. --Uğurkenttalk 15:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Несмир Кудилович (разговор) 15:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Long pattern of hat collecting that results in minor to no usage of such roles once obtained. Nihlus 16:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Could you give some examples? Vermont (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- See my oppose on en:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kostas20142. It's the second one. On top of that, he has been an ArbCom Clerk trainee and was removed for inactivity. Another example. Nihlus 17:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Could you give some examples? Vermont (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -FASTILY 19:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support good cross-wiki work. Hat collecting is, as usual, a non-issue for me since global rollback causes incredibly little harm when unused. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support per Riley. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:33, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -BRP ever 08:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Support -J. Ansari Talk 14:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 16:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Global rollback for Gumruch
- Global user: Gumruch (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 6 April 2020 18:11 UTC
Hello, I have a global account since 2008. I am a sysop on cs-wiki and regular cross-wiki contributor flagged with editor/autopatrolled/autoreview rights on 11 other wikis. Global rollback would be usefull for me as I usually check global contributions of local vandal IPs. I have read and understood the rollback rules. Thank you. Gumruch (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global sysop permissions
![]() |
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Requests for global rename permissions
Steward requests/Global permissions/Global renamers
Global rename for Phjtieudoc
- Wiki: meta.wikimedia.org (list 'crats • bot policy • summary • 'crats rights)
- User: Phjtieudoc (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
- Not ending before 2 April 2020 04:17 UTC
Hello. I'm Phjtieudoc from the Vietnamese Wikipedia. I have joined Wikipedia since March 16th, 2017 and currently have more than 10000 edits on Vietnamese Wikipedia. I can speak Vietnamese and English. Currently I'm a Patroller on Wikipedia, which fight vandalism and tagging speedy deletion on articles, and helping the newcomers. For months, our "user renaming request" page have tons of requests on renaming. Thus we do have a global renamer who speaks Vietnamese but he usually don't active for personal reasons, and most of the global renamer couldn't speak Vietnamese, so it is hard for them to know the name changing reasons provided by users. I came here from 1997kB's recommendation and I'd like to volunteer to be the second renamer for the Vietnamese Wikipedia to complete those undone renaming request and respond them more quickly. I am often active on our home Wikipedia and want to make Wikipedia a better place for the users. I have read the terms & policies on meta and want to be another hand to reduce the works of global renamers, free them more times for editing. Thank you for your attention to this request, have a nice day and best regards! Phjtieudoc (talk) 04:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Well.. not a perfect candidate, but I am satisfied with their work on local venue-which receives good amount of requests and there's only one native renamer to handle them.
- To the candidate, if this pass please proceed carefully and whenever have doubts, consult before act. Good luck! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Oppose same as above. If the claim is that you’ll be using it to support one language group that’s great, but I would prefer to see
+sysop
on that project to show the trust of the local community. No familiarity with renames or naming policy on more than one project makes lake of sysop there a no-go from me. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Support Per 1997kB. I think they should be okay despite not a sysop as they are quite active at local venue. We need vi renamers too. If they are clerking without good clue at the local venue, I think they will be prohibited long ago which they aren't so they are sort of okay.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 16:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Support cons : Not an admin, Pros : Language skill + Have experience as clerk.--AldnonymousBicara? 17:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Support per 1997KB.--BRP ever 04:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Not a local admin, but experience as a clerk. Contributions on the viwiki page look good. – Ajraddatz (talk) 20:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Support, per above. —Sgd. Hasley 14:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Support, even though I agree that you should try to get adminship. Leaderboard (talk) 05:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Support I prefer prospective global renamers to be an administrator elsewhere, but I'm willing to make an exception this time as they have good experience as a clerk and giving them the tools will benefit Vietnamese Wikipedia. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 12:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -FASTILY 19:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support LGTM per 1997kB --DannyS712 (talk) 15:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support No concerns here. ~riley (talk) 18:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Good to go. Minorax (talk) 18:08, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support per 1997kB and Camouflaged Mirage. --Kostas20142 (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support no concerns here either. More diverse language renamers the better, in my books. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -J. Ansari Talk 14:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Requests for global IP block exemption
![]() |
| Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
remove GIPBE for Slywizard21
- Global user: Slywizard21 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
CU blocked on enwiki as a sockpuppet of a blocked user, violated IPBE policy. Also inactive for 2 years, last edit on 27 March 2018. -- CptViraj (📧) 08:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Global IP block exempt for Qiyue2001
- Global user: Qiyue2001 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
A proxy is needed to edit any wikimedia-affiliated wikis in PRC due to the cencorship. I have had IPBE on zhwiki years ago, and now I would request a global permission to edit on other wikis, thanks, --Qiyue2001 (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Qiyue2001: you already have GIPBE. However, as the flag doesn't exempt you from local blocks, you may need to contact a local sysop of the project you are trying to edit so they can grant you a local flag. —Thanks for the fish! talk•contribs 16:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
![]() |
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
2FA Tester for Koryva
- Global user: Koryva (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Hi there. I'm running through 1Password to change all my matching passwords to unique ones and noticed 2FA is possible with Wikimedia. Since I work in security, I would very much appreciate it if you would please allow 2FA on my account. Thanks much, in advance! -- Koryva
2FA Tester for Thompson.matthew
- Global user: Thompson.matthew (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
Read the help page, know how TOTP works, won't lose seed key, will save backup scratch codes. --Thompson.matthew (talk) 13:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Requests for other global permissions
![]() |
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
global interface editor for Petrb
- Global user: Petrb (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA)
- Discussion: Hi, I had this permission four times or more, but it was always automatically removed after some time, I would like to have it again, because it helps me maintain Huggle and its configuration pages and templates, which are all over Wikimedia projects, and often protected, thanks. Petrb (talk) 21:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not ending before 21:09, 1 April 2020 UTC
Support doesn't look like the rights are used much (examples might be nice!), but for the primary maintainer of a massively used program I'm comfortable with giving this access for the few times when it is needed. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support Per Ajraddatz. Do add a closing date please too. Thanks.Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support No concerns - good for another year. Closing date added. ~riley (talk) 19:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -FASTILY 19:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support trusted user, valid reason. --Kostas20142 (talk) 23:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Support per Ajr and riley. --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Support -BRP ever 08:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation