Steps to replicate the issue (include links if applicable):
- Add ltr talk page discussion in an rtl wiki or the other way around.
- Here is an example: https://fa.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=35343366#A_report:_IP_Editing_Restriction_Study_on_Farsi_Wikipedia
What happens?:
I haven't tested this on a wiki with new discussion looks but it's probably going to suffer similarly:
What should have happened instead?:
Open question(s)
- 1. Should Topic Container metadata actions follow directionality of interface or content language? See T305286 and T311663.
Testing
- Create an LTR-wrapped discussion on an RTL wiki, e.g. https://ar.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/wiki/%D9%86%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B4:%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%AA%D9%8A%D9%85%D8%B1_%D9%81%D9%88%D9%86_%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%84?dtenable=1
- Check the page with visual enhancements (topic containers) both enabled and disabled
Expected:
- The subscribe button is aligned opposite to the heading text (i.e. on the right, as the topic is LTR)
- Topic container metadata follows the interface directionality (RTL) so is also right aligned