Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes
- PMID: 16595217
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.077
Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether patients with borderline semen should be treated with conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Design: Randomized study.
Setting: A university medical center in The Netherlands.
Patient(s): One hundred six couples with borderline semen who were undergoing IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes.
Intervention(s): Performing IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes.
Main outcome measure(s): Fertilization and pregnancy rates.
Result(s): One thousand five hundred eighteen oocytes were collected in 106 oocyte retrievals: 849 oocytes were randomly allocated to ICSI, of which 761 were microinjected, and 669 oocytes were randomly assigned to IVF. In 26 of the 106 patients, there was fertilization only after ICSI and not after IVF (IVF- group). The fertilization rate was 51% (92/182 oocytes). In 78 patients, there was fertilization after both IVF and ICSI (IVF+ group); the fertilization rate was 51% for both the IVF- and ICSI-treated oocytes (271/528 oocytes and 334/658 oocytes, respectively). In 2 patients, there was no fertilization after either IVF (0/6 oocytes) or ICSI (0/9 oocytes). Patients of the IVF+ group had a higher total motile sperm count after preparation than did those of the IVF- group. More high-quality embryos were obtained after ICSI in patients of the IVF+ group. In 101 patients, embryo transfer was performed: 26 in the IVF- group and 75 in the IVF+ group. No significant differences were found with regard to pregnancy rates between those two groups: pregnancy rates were 54% in the IVF- group and 48% in the IVF+ group.
Conclusion(s): Performing ICSI on at least some of the oocytes will avoid unnecessary fertilization failure in patients with borderline semen: in this study, 26 of 104 cycles (25%) were rescued by ICSI.
Similar articles
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a treatment for unexplained total fertilization failure or low fertilization after conventional in vitro fertilization.Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):612-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.029. Fertil Steril. 2005. PMID: 15749489 Clinical Trial.
-
Electrical activation of oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a controlled randomized study.Fertil Steril. 2009 Jan;91(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Fertil Steril. 2009. PMID: 18829025 Clinical Trial.
-
Artificial oocyte activation in severe teratozoospermia undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.047. Epub 2008 Jan 18. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 18206146 Clinical Trial.
-
Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters are not related to fertilization rates, embryo quality, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection, but might be related to spontaneous abortion rates.Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.018. Epub 2007 Sep 27. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17904130 Review.
-
[Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001. PMID: 11499344 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 15;8(8):CD001301. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001301.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37581383 Review.
-
Prolonged semen incubation alters the biological characteristics of human spermatozoa.Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022 Dec;49(4):270-276. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2022.05435. Epub 2022 Nov 7. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2022. PMID: 36482501 Free PMC article.
-
Opportunities and Limits of Conventional IVF versus ICSI: It Is Time to Come off the Fence.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5722. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195722. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36233589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ALWAYS ICSI? A SWOT analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Sep;37(9):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01836-0. Epub 2020 Jun 24. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 32578032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) versus conventional in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in couples with non-severe male infertility (NSMI-ICSI): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 30;9(9):e030366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030366. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31575574 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical