A multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of combination methotrexate and gefitinib versus methotrexate alone to treat tubal ectopic pregnancies (GEM3): trial protocol
- PMID: 30458863
- PMCID: PMC6247635
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-3008-6
A multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial of combination methotrexate and gefitinib versus methotrexate alone to treat tubal ectopic pregnancies (GEM3): trial protocol
Abstract
Background: Tubal ectopic pregnancy (tEP) is the most common life-threatening condition in gynaecology. Treatment options include surgery and medical management. Stable women with tEPs with pre-treatment serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels < 1000 IU/L respond well to outpatient medical treatment with intramuscular methotrexate. However, tEPs with hCG > 1000 IU/L can take significant time to resolve with methotrexate and require multiple outpatient monitoring visits. In pre-clinical studies, we found that tEP implantation sites express high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor. In early-phase trials, we found that combination therapy with gefitinib, an orally active epidermal growth factor receptor antagonist, and methotrexate resolved tEPs without the need for surgery in over 70% of cases, did not cause significant toxicities, and was well tolerated. We describe the protocol of a randomised trial to assess the efficacy of combination gefitinib and methotrexate, versus methotrexate alone, in reducing the need for surgical intervention for tEPs.
Methods and analysis: We propose to undertake a multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial (around 70 sites across the UK) and recruit 328 women with tEPs (with pre-treatment serum hCG of 1000-5000 IU/L). Women will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio by a secure online system to receive a single dose of intramuscular methotrexate (50 mg/m2) and either oral gefitinib or matched placebo (250 mg) daily for 7 days. Participants and healthcare providers will remain blinded to treatment allocation throughout the trial. The primary outcome is the need for surgical intervention for tEP. Secondary outcomes are the need for further methotrexate treatment, time to resolution of the tEP (serum hCG ≤ 15 IU/L), number of hospital visits associated with treatment (until resolution or scheduled/emergency surgery), and the return of menses by 3 months after resolution. We will also assess adverse events and reactions until day of resolution or surgery, and participant-reported acceptability at 3 months.
Discussion: A medical intervention that reduces the need for surgery and resolves tEP faster would be a favourable treatment alternative. If effective, we believe that gefitinib and methotrexate could become standard care for stable tEPs.
Trial registration: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN67795930 . Registered 15 September 2016.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Ectopic pregnancy; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Gefitinib; Gynaecology; Methotrexate; Reproductive medicine; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (16/SS/0014) on 29 February 2016. Data will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. We will make the information available to the public through national bodies and charities, e.g. the Ectopic Pregnancy Trust.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
ST holds a patent that relates to the use of gefitinib to treat ectopic pregnancies. BM is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548). BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva, Merck KGaA, and Guerbet. CB is on the advisory panel for Clearblue, was Scientific Chair of the Association of Early Pregnancy Units 2015–2017, and is a Medical Advisor to the Ectopic Pregnancy Trust. TB receives departmental research support from Roche Diagnostics and Samsung Medison. AWH is on the Scientific Board of the Association of Early Pregnancy Units, and is a Trustee and Medical Advisor to the Ectopic Pregnancy Trust. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Phase II single arm open label multicentre clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of a combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancies (GEM II): study protocol.BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 19;3(7):e002902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002902. Print 2013. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 23872290 Free PMC article.
-
Gefitinib and methotrexate to resolve tubal ectopic pregnancy: the GEM3 RCT.Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Jun. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Jun. PMID: 37459432 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Combination gefitinib and methotrexate treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies: a case series.Hum Reprod. 2014 Jul;29(7):1375-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu091. Epub 2014 May 7. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 24812320 Free PMC article.
-
Combination of gefitinib and methotrexate to treat tubal ectopic pregnancy (GEM3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2023 Feb 25;401(10377):655-663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02478-3. Epub 2023 Feb 1. Lancet. 2023. PMID: 36738759 Clinical Trial.
-
Methotrexate vs placebo in early tubal ectopic pregnancy: a multi- centre double-blind randomised trial.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012 Aug;7(3):238-43. doi: 10.2174/157488712802281321. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2012. PMID: 22540910 Review.
Cited by
-
Have we overlooked the role of mifepristone for the medical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy?Hum Reprod. 2023 Aug 1;38(8):1445-1448. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead116. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37295950 Free PMC article.
-
Early (Days 1-4) post-treatment serum hCG level changes predict single-dose methotrexate treatment success in tubal ectopic pregnancy.Hum Reprod. 2023 Jul 5;38(7):1261-1267. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead089. Hum Reprod. 2023. PMID: 37178269 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Future Perspectives of Ectopic Pregnancy Treatment-Review of Possible Pharmacological Methods.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114230. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36361110 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G, Dawson A, Drife J, Garrod D, Harper A, Hulbert D, Lucas S, McClure J, et al. Saving mothers' lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The eighth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118(Suppl 1):1–203. - PubMed
-
- Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management in early pregnancy for ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage (clinical guideline 154) [http://www.nice.org.uk/CG154]. Accessed 12 Nov 2018.
-
- van Mello NM, Mol F, Verhoeve HR, van Wely M, Adriaanse AH, Boss EA, Dijkman AB, Bayram N, Emanuel MH, Friederich J, et al. Methotrexate or expectant management in women with an ectopic pregnancy or pregnancy of unknown location and low serum hCG concentrations? A randomized comparison. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):60–67. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des373. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous