Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology
- PMID: 34136666
- PMCID: PMC8178439
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001
Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology
Abstract
Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown's infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the 'hope technology' which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted 'quests for conception'. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories - namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men's eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own 'masculine hope technology'; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are 'good to think with' in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.
Keywords: anthropology; assisted reproductive technology; in-vitro fertilization; reproduction; reproductive science; sociology.
© 2020 The Author(s).
Similar articles
-
Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 May 13;10:46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020 Jun. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020. PMID: 32760816 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection beyond 2020.BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(2):237-243. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15526. BJOG. 2019. PMID: 30548407 Review.
-
Medical Cosmopolitanism in Global Dubai: A Twenty-first-century Transnational Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Depot.Med Anthropol Q. 2017 Mar;31(1):5-22. doi: 10.1111/maq.12275. Epub 2016 Feb 15. Med Anthropol Q. 2017. PMID: 26756447
-
Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. Epub 2015 Mar 22. Hum Reprod Update. 2015. PMID: 25801630 Review.
-
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074488 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agigian A. Wesleyan University Press; Middlefield, CT: 2004. Baby Steps: How Lesbian Alternative Insemination is Changing the World.
-
- Ahmed L. Women and the advent of Islam. Signs. 2006;11:665–691.
-
- Almeling R. University of California Press; Berkeley, CA: 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm.
-
- Argyle C.E., Harper J.C., Davies M.C. Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016;22:440–449. - PubMed
-
- Baldwin K. ‘I suppose I think to myself, that’s the best way to be a mother’: how ideologies of parenthood shape women’s use for social egg freezing technology. Sociol. Res. Online. 2017;22:2–15.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources