RfA/RfB voting history: CX Zoom

CX Zoom has cast 18 support, 0 oppose and 1 neutral votes. The tool was unable to find votes in 2 RfAs/RfBs they've edited.

Supported

• Novem Linguae (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 16:57, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
• Ingenuity (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 19:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
• Spicy (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 14:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
• Aoidh (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
• ComplexRational (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support. I see no issues. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 13:12, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
• Extraordinary Writ (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support Obviously. A great editor whom I've seen do great job here and there. My personal interaction with him was when he helped me get some pages from a book at Resource Exchange. He is willing to go that extra mile to assist editors trying to improve content on Wikipedia. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 16:12, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
• Isabelle Belato (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support: Fully qualified candidate with lots of content creation and anti-vandalism experience. The signature issue alone wasn't enough to sway me away from Support column, but its handling was also very impressive. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 13:32, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
• Whpq (Successful, edits to page)
  • I'm very glad that you ran. Easy support. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 13:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
• Z1720 (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 11:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
• Femke (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 02:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
• Shushugah (Unsuccessful, edits to page)
  • Support: I have seen them work elsewhere. I see no issues honestly. Has a clue, is civil, and willing to help out. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 08:46, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
• DatGuy (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support Fastily's oppose gave me a pause, but I find strong agreement in Tavix's, Volten's, Nick's rationale. Administrator numbers are in decline, and a good contributor should be given the tools. A net positive to the project. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 05:55, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
• DanCherek (Successful, edits to page)
  • Sure why not? —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • {C•X})} 07:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
• Tamzin (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support: One of those How aren't you an admin already? editors. Glad to support. —CX Zoom[he/him] ^{(let's talk • C • L)} 07:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

• Colin M (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support. I'm new to the RM area but I've seen Colin do a really fine job in here. His answers to the various questions were compelling too. I'm glad that a fellow Page mover is running for Adminship. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 14:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• Sdrqaz (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support. I often came across their work and I've never found issues with them. Thoughtful answers. Overall a good candidate in my view. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 17:15, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
• Firefly (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support, did a quick review, couldn't find any red flags. Though I haven't had much interaction with him, he's being unanimously supported by everyone I know are great editors/administrators. I see no issue with granting him the mop. All the best. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 09:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
• Modussiccandi (Successful, edits to page)
  • Support No reason to not support after going through their answers above. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 17:08, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Opposed

Neutral

• theleekycauldron (Unsuccessful, edits to page)
  • Neutral leaning oppose: I've some concerns about the implications of granting Adminship to TLC (and birth age is not one of them). My opposition is mostly on the basis of her editing activity as raised by many editors before me. The existence of pages named I see dumb people here, the word Fuck in at least two instances of which one seem to be demeaning another editor, the Belle Delphine DYK debacle and the decision to remove a genuine criticism from her talk page not as a regular cleanup but apparently as a way to hide it from plain sight raises some questions. I wouldn't be casting a vote until she answer the questions raised above or if they don't in which case I'll be opposing this request. In either case, I see TLC as a great editor who does much of the behind the scenes work on DYK nomination area and I wish her the best. Regards, ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 13:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Unknown

These are RfAs/RfBs that the user has edited, but the tool was unable to parse a vote for.

• President-Wiki-Man (Unsuccessful, edits to page)
• Lee Vilenski (RfB, Successful, edits to page)

Read the documentation, view the source code, or report some bugs.