User talk:Purplebackpack89: Difference between revisions
→Unblock after nine months: Re:Kennedy |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::Well, I personally don't believe they warranted a ban. If I edit in the same manner I edit on EN, where people generally don't have problems with either my edits ''or'' candor, I doubt I'll have problems here. '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/c|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 16:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC) |
::Well, I personally don't believe they warranted a ban. If I edit in the same manner I edit on EN, where people generally don't have problems with either my edits ''or'' candor, I doubt I'll have problems here. '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/c|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 16:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::eek! Thats not what I wanted to hear. Basically you're saying you've learned nothing? Taken nothing on board? Thats a dissapointing response to a perfectly good question. That doesn't really warrant an ublock PBP... Note that I actually supported your unblock on ST, but I find this worrying... <small>[[user:kennedy|<font color="#800000" face="lucida handwriting">Kennedy</font>]]</small> <sup>([[user_talk:kennedy|<font color="#800000">talk</font>]]) </sup> 11:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
:::eek! Thats not what I wanted to hear. Basically you're saying you've learned nothing? Taken nothing on board? Thats a dissapointing response to a perfectly good question. That doesn't really warrant an ublock PBP... Note that I actually supported your unblock on ST, but I find this worrying... <small>[[user:kennedy|<font color="#800000" face="lucida handwriting">Kennedy</font>]]</small> <sup>([[user_talk:kennedy|<font color="#800000">talk</font>]]) </sup> 11:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
'''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/c|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 11:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:::::I took that from the part that you say that the ban wasn't warranted, you'll edit the same as you do on EN where they don't have problems. Basically from that I think you're saying that you are going to continue to edit the same as you did before? <small>[[user:kennedy|<font color="#800000" face="lucida handwriting">Kennedy</font>]]</small> <sup>([[user_talk:kennedy|<font color="#800000">talk</font>]]) </sup> 11:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
:::::I took that from the part that you say that the ban wasn't warranted, you'll edit the same as you do on EN where they don't have problems. Basically from that I think you're saying that you are going to continue to edit the same as you did before? <small>[[user:kennedy|<font color="#800000" face="lucida handwriting">Kennedy</font>]]</small> <sup>([[user_talk:kennedy|<font color="#800000">talk</font>]]) </sup> 11:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::::Before on '''EN'''. Since I've never been blocked there and have over 11,000 contributions, I must be doing ''something'' right. The people who want to keep me banned center around an argument that I can't go more than a few edits without disrupting the project and my block record on EN contradicts that assumption. '''''[[User talk:Purplebackpack89#top|<font color="#660066">Purpleback</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89|<font color="#000000">pack</font>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/c|<font color="gold">89</font>]]<font color="#FF9900">≈≈≈≈</font>''''' 11:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
*Since you are community banned, I opened a thread on [[WP:ST]] ([[Wikipedia:Simple talk#Unblock request from Purplebackpack89|see here]]) for everyone to comment. -[[User:Barras|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''Barras'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Barras|<span style="color:red; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''talk'''</span>]] 16:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC) |
*Since you are community banned, I opened a thread on [[WP:ST]] ([[Wikipedia:Simple talk#Unblock request from Purplebackpack89|see here]]) for everyone to comment. -[[User:Barras|<span style="color:blue; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''Barras'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Barras|<span style="color:red; font-family:Bookman Old Style">'''talk'''</span>]] 16:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:11, 6 August 2012
![]() | This user has been banned indefinitely from changing Wikipedia by the community. Please review the banning policy before commenting or unblocking. (see: block log · changes · current autoblocks) |
Unblock
- You might want to write a more substantive request. The above is ambiguous and unlikely to gain much support. Best, Goodvac (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- The point is that the block hasn't served its purpose of making the WP better. Since I've been gone for the last three months, edits that I would have made weren't made by anyone else. Ergo, you need "a few good men" like me to make those edits.
- Also, DJ, can you point to where the consensus was six months. I remember two or three Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 20:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Block review
- Um, the block was in November. May is six months from November, not seven, therefore I am requesting again
- In response to DJSasso, please paste the follow:
- Um, Goblin (multiple times) and Kennedy/Ydennek/NotGiven... Also, the point of any block is to make the Wikipedia mainspace better. The block has failed in that regard. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 13:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry
Sorry that your still blocked dude.184.44.131.154 (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Unblock after nine months
Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 14:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Non-admin comments I believe Purplebackpack89 deserves to edit here again. Blocks/bans are only used to stop destructive vandalism not to take someone's privileges away forever. I believe we can trust him again after watching his edits on other sister projects and wikipedias, which shows growth overall in cooperation with other users. Purplebackpack89, how would it be different if the community allows you to edit freely again? Have you really thought about your actions that ultimately led to you being banned? Best, Jonatalk to me 16:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I personally don't believe they warranted a ban. If I edit in the same manner I edit on EN, where people generally don't have problems with either my edits or candor, I doubt I'll have problems here. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 16:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
- eek! Thats not what I wanted to hear. Basically you're saying you've learned nothing? Taken nothing on board? Thats a dissapointing response to a perfectly good question. That doesn't really warrant an ublock PBP... Note that I actually supported your unblock on ST, but I find this worrying... Kennedy (talk) 11:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I personally don't believe they warranted a ban. If I edit in the same manner I edit on EN, where people generally don't have problems with either my edits or candor, I doubt I'll have problems here. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 16:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 11:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I took that from the part that you say that the ban wasn't warranted, you'll edit the same as you do on EN where they don't have problems. Basically from that I think you're saying that you are going to continue to edit the same as you did before? Kennedy (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Before on EN. Since I've never been blocked there and have over 11,000 contributions, I must be doing something right. The people who want to keep me banned center around an argument that I can't go more than a few edits without disrupting the project and my block record on EN contradicts that assumption. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 11:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- I took that from the part that you say that the ban wasn't warranted, you'll edit the same as you do on EN where they don't have problems. Basically from that I think you're saying that you are going to continue to edit the same as you did before? Kennedy (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Since you are community banned, I opened a thread on WP:ST (see here) for everyone to comment. -Barras talk 16:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Statement of reasons for unban (for Auntof6)
You can expect good behavior owing to thousands of EN-Wiki and SIMPLE-wiktionary edits without a block while continuing to hold rollback, reviewer and autopatroller. Also, I'd point out that most similar bans (i.e. ones not stemming from) have been lifted after nine months or less Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 22:47, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Response to Gotanda
Diffs please that point to anything of a disruptive nature. Gotanda, Calling starting an RfC about whether unsourced articles should be merged or deletion "arguing" is inaccurate: it's perfectly acceptable to question the notability of unsourced articles in an RfC, and certainly not a reason to keep me banned. If people thought I incessentally argued about the LDS Church, I'd have been blocked on EN or restricted from LDS-related articles over there, neither of which has come close to happening. Therefore, I think your criticism is a bit invalid, and that you should reconsider calls to keep me banned. Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 01:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)