Wikifunctions:Requests for deletions: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Mdaniels5757 in topic Requests for deletion
Content deleted Content added
→Z1221 & Z1501: Reply |
Mdaniels5757 (talk | contribs) →Z10444: resolved |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::::Oh I didn't realize that different things were under different licenses, neat! Either way its a different license and I'm not a lawyer [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 17:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
::::Oh I didn't realize that different things were under different licenses, neat! Either way its a different license and I'm not a lawyer [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 17:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
::Yeah, I did a check myself on the compatibility between cc4.0 and Apache2.0 before I deleted, it was a bit of a grey zone from my quick read, therefore I deleted considering 1: Grey zones are best to be avoided where possible. 2: The description of the object included cc4.0 licence when created and 3: the title in general indicated that it probably shouldn't be used therefore I deleted for copyvio. [[User:Terasail|<span style="color:#088; font-weight:750;">Terasail</span>]][[User talk:Terasail|<sup><span style="color:#000;">'''[✉️]'''</span></sup>]] 15:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
::Yeah, I did a check myself on the compatibility between cc4.0 and Apache2.0 before I deleted, it was a bit of a grey zone from my quick read, therefore I deleted considering 1: Grey zones are best to be avoided where possible. 2: The description of the object included cc4.0 licence when created and 3: the title in general indicated that it probably shouldn't be used therefore I deleted for copyvio. [[User:Terasail|<span style="color:#088; font-weight:750;">Terasail</span>]][[User talk:Terasail|<sup><span style="color:#000;">'''[✉️]'''</span></sup>]] 15:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
{{Section resolved|1=—‍[[User:Mdaniels5757|Mdaniels5757]] ([[User talk:Mdaniels5757|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mdaniels5757|contribs]]) 21:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)}} |
|||
=== [[Z1221]] & [[Z1501]] === |
=== [[Z1221]] & [[Z1501]] === |
||
Revision as of 21:40, 18 November 2023
Functions or implementations or tests who do not work properly or meet notability criteria can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions under the "Requests for deletion" section below.
If it is obvious vandalism, just report it in Wikifunctions:Report vandalism, or ping an administrator. Contact can also be made with an administrator on Telegram or IRC #wikipedia-abstract.
 | SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. |
| edit |
|
|---|
| Archives |
Requests for deletion
Z10444
Per http://brainfuck.org/ and the description on the item itself, released under CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is not compatible with CC0. --DannyS712 (talk) 03:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Done Terasail[✉️] 11:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)- Sidenote/reminder, per site-footer "All code fragments and implementations in the main namespace are available under the Apache 2.0 License." -- I don't know if this affects the deletion nomination though. Hope that helps. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 15:13, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Quiddity (WMF) the warning when publishing is that you release things under CC0 not Apache 2 DannyS712 (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- For function-definitions it warns about CC0, but for function-implementations it warns for Apache 2. (I checked! (imgur link)). :-) Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh I didn't realize that different things were under different licenses, neat! Either way its a different license and I'm not a lawyer DannyS712 (talk) 17:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- For function-definitions it warns about CC0, but for function-implementations it warns for Apache 2. (I checked! (imgur link)). :-) Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, I did a check myself on the compatibility between cc4.0 and Apache2.0 before I deleted, it was a bit of a grey zone from my quick read, therefore I deleted considering 1: Grey zones are best to be avoided where possible. 2: The description of the object included cc4.0 licence when created and 3: the title in general indicated that it probably shouldn't be used therefore I deleted for copyvio. Terasail[✉️] 15:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Quiddity (WMF) the warning when publishing is that you release things under CC0 not Apache 2 DannyS712 (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Minnan (Z1221) & Minnan (Pe̍h-ōe-jī) (Z1501)
Related to the same natural language. --Wolverène (talk) 08:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. I am also not sure it is a good idea to distinguish between Southern Min language and Standard Chinese spoken in the Minnan region, it was hardly assumed by those who assigned the codes. --Wolverène (talk) 08:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ping @Quiddity (WMF): since you have been able to help with a similar request. --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've added a note to phab:T348370 about this. Please postpone the deletion here, for now. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 20:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)