After a bleak climate change-denying US presidential debate last week, the US Supreme Court also announced another move with potentially major implications on the climate tech market — the revocation of a precedent known as the Chevron Doctrine, which allowed agencies like the EPA, IRS, and more to issue guidance around key issues. In other news: - Fervo Energy’s biggest power purchase agreements ever - Rivian and Volkswagen’s new $5bn deal - And a sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) partnership between LanzaTech and LanzaJet. In deals - $375m for Sila Nanotechnologies, Inc. silicon anodes, - $211m for Eos Energy Enterprises, Inc. energy storage, - $120m for Etched's efficient AI chips. And keep an eye on your inbox for our newsletter this Friday — where we’ll have our special report on funding for the first half of 2024. Follow on for the details 👇 https://lnkd.in/e4QdeSuu
Sightline Climate (CTVC)’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Energy & Climate Policy | Track II Energy Diplomacy | 📍Brussels, Abu Dhabi | Oxford MPP | Opinions my own |
Critical topic, thank you for highlighting it, Ann Mettler! Apart from "non-EU cleantech," I believe it's crucial to understand whether we can accurately quantify the "correct" figures for missed climate targets, and even more so for energy security. For decades, we have struggled to assign a dollar figure to climate inaction and discount rates, and I believe this challenge will persist. However, it is timely to question whether we can adequately assess energy security risks and determine the associated costs. If so, how long should these cost-benefit analyses be, and as always, what should we label as pluses and minuses?
Vice President, Europe at Breakthrough Energy. Previously, Director-General at European Commission. Views are my own, often rooted in 20+ years of experience in public policy.
As #eu Ambassadors meet to talk (and chop) #cleantech #funding - pretty much one year after President Von der Leyen's seminal speech in #davos, vowing that 'the story of the clean-tech economy will be written in Europe' - I was delighted to be quoted in today's POLITICO Europe Energy and Climate newsletter: Cost of inaction: “Back in my days in EU public policy, we would always try to calculate the ‘Cost of non-EU’,” Ann Mettler, a former head of the European Commission’s in-house think tank who’s now high up at Bill Gates’ Breakthrough Energy venture, wrote on LinkedIn. “Perhaps some former colleagues would be so kind to calculate the ‘Cost of non-EU cleantech’ — not only in terms of missed climate targets but also (energy) security compromised, unhealthy dependencies deepened, and (even more) industrial competitiveness lost.” You can read the post here: https://lnkd.in/e78vQnhB
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
"There's a little bit of an arms race ... between industrial nations. Nobody wants to lose their competitive edge," says Chris Taylor, chief executive of GridStor. "Industrial policy is back at the forefront all over the globe." Our CEO joins other global business leaders in the Financial Times weighing in on how the 37% increase in investment in #CleanEnergy in the U.S. this year is also emblematic of policy tensions around globalization -- read the story at https://lnkd.in/gigzW-SP #Cleantech #BatteryStorage #IRA #Decarbonization #FinancialTimes #industrialpolicy #EnergyStorage #supplychain
Biden’s climate law triggers global shifts in cleantech supply chain
ft.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Good things come to those who act!" A common and frankly boring argument against nascent low carbon technologies is that they are not readily available and very expensive. It is boring because it is an argument that can be levied against pretty much every new technology. In this short but punchy piece, the FT reminds us how much of the progress that will come (or not) is in our hands. We need to get going with deploying low-carbon tech at scale so we learn the lessons and the benefits can start accruing. In a world that has now breached the 1.5degC warming threshold for a few months now, it is a timely reminder...
Fossil fuels could have been left in the dust 25 years ago
ft.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
US industrial policy is highly charged! Today the Treasury department released guidance on 45X manufacturing tax credits--a reminder that the battery supply chain is central to American global industrial competition. The separate incentives for battery metals production, electrode materials production, cell manufacturing, and pack manufacturing mean each part of the supply chain has support to develop domestically -- and all of the incentives are *stackable*, compounding cost reductions in the batteries manufactured for #EnergyStorage and #ElectricVehicles. It is also satisfying to see reasonable guidance that will allow unconventional battery techs, like #ThermalStorage and #FlowBatteries, to qualify for incentives--we're going to need all the energy storage we can make here. Re-upping the Financial Times story and why we at GridStor are quoted--the US energy storage sector is at the crossroads of US industrial policy and climate policy.
"There's a little bit of an arms race ... between industrial nations. Nobody wants to lose their competitive edge," says Chris Taylor, chief executive of GridStor. "Industrial policy is back at the forefront all over the globe." Our CEO joins other global business leaders in the Financial Times weighing in on how the 37% increase in investment in #CleanEnergy in the U.S. this year is also emblematic of policy tensions around globalization -- read the story at https://lnkd.in/gigzW-SP #Cleantech #BatteryStorage #IRA #Decarbonization #FinancialTimes #industrialpolicy #EnergyStorage #supplychain
Biden’s climate law triggers global shifts in cleantech supply chain
ft.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The German business daily Handelsblatt published my op-ed today in which I argue for a fundamental rethink so that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) becomes a vital option in Germany to reach our ambitious climate goals. More here: https://brnw.ch/21wDDjT The reality we have to face is this: Without #CCS as additional element, it will hardly be possible to sufficiently abate the greenhouse gas emissions of a number of key industries. The technology is a pivotal tool to meet climate goals within the timeframes Germany has set for itself while also keeping industry jobs in Germany. The eight key takeaways from my article are: 👉 Germany aims to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. That is a very ambitious goal. To succeed, we need to use all available instruments. 👉 As to creating the proper regulatory environment, we need to avoid the tendency to formulate lofty goals that then get stuck in the gears of bureaucracy. 👉 To date, carbon storage is largely viewed as a niche solution in Germany. Making matters worse, the relevant legislation, the “Kohlendioxidspeicherungs¬gesetz” (Carbon Dioxide Storage Act) of 2012, effectively shackles the development of CCS projects in Germany. 👉 CCS is critical to maintaining the competitiveness of a range of important German industries such as the cement and glass industry, but also the iron and steel industry as well as large parts of the building materials industry and consumer goods industries. 👉 Moreover, this technology also has the potential to become an industrial growth market. Indeed, CO2 could serve as a valuable raw material for new fields of application, for example, in the chemical or plastics industries. There are already examples that have achieved proof of concept. 👉 Politics and business need to work together to reach Germany’s climate goals. This involves promoting and implementing innovative solutions. Other nations, including the United States and Norway, have shown that this can be achieved when it comes to CCS. 👉 German companies are highly innovative and very skilled technologically. The German mechanical engineering sector in particular can pride itself in its track record of always meeting the technical and commercial requirements of the times. This can also become true for CCS. 👉 In summary, the task ahead is to find the right balance between regulation, engineering capabilities and entrepreneurial freedom. If we can achieve that, we can simultaneously serve our economic and our climate goals.
Gastkommentar: Warum Politik und Wirtschaft in der deutschen Klimapolitik viel enger zusammenarbeiten müssen
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I saw this chart yesterday 👇 Clean technologies and energy are growing exponentially 😌 Plus, RMI has just published The Cleantech Revolution report with lots of data and chart backing this thesis. The next post of The Climate Tech Business will be fun to write 🤓
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The controversial environment-saving tech that sounds like it was pitched by a stoned teenager — “You should, like, suck all the carbon stuff out of the sky or whatever” — is suddenly a very real thing. Direct air capture (DAC) is the emerging atmosphere-restoring process of sucking in large quantities of air, stripping out carbon dioxide molecules, then transferring that carbon into underground storage. But could it really work? That's exactly the question we're trying to answer in today's edition of The Hustle. Catch up on it here⬇️
Sky vacuums may not reduce carbon, but they sure are good at sucking up billions
thehustle.co
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
2023 will be remembered as the year BigTech recognised the value of Direct Air Capture. Frontier, now on the 3rd purchase cycle, announced their Summer 2023 recipients and allocated $3m out of the $10m in pre-purchase agreements to DAC start-ups. Congratulations Airhive, Spiritus, Holocene, EDAC Labs, and Carbon Atlantis! Frontier's support for innovative and novel approaches to CDR along with a commitment to open-source has arguably been the single most catalytic intervention in CDR. Check out the deal details here: https://lnkd.in/eiQyK7ds A few steps further up the TRL scale... This week Amazon added their name to the growing list of corporate giants entering the world of direct air capture. Their purchase of 250,000 tonnes over a 10-year period procured from 1PointFive's Stratos Plant, is yet another fine example of the bold and ambitious corporate action we need to see to ramp up scale in our seemingly not-so nascent industry. Alongside this purchase, which ranks in at the 6th largest carbon removal deal in history, Amazon's $2Bn investment into the Climate Pledge Fund added CarbonCapture Inc. to their list of portfolio companies. No corporate has done more for carbon removal than Microsoft who account for over 2.8 million tonnes purchased. Last week, this number increased to over to 3.1 million as they announced a deal totalling 315,000 tonnes from Heirloom. For so long the question has been: "what does DAC need to scale?" This of course is a multifaceted question but let us not underestimated the value of having these kind of deals on your books and the capital that comes with it, regardless what end of the spectrum TRL spectrum your company sits. The Direct Air Capture Coalition applauds the leadership shown from all organisations involved. Congratulations all! Melanie Nakagawa, Lauren Kickham, Brian Marrs & Shashank Samala, Noah McQueen Adiari Vazquez, Ph.D., & Adrian Corless, Jonas Lee, Patricia Loria, MBA and MNR Amazon Deal - https://lnkd.in/eYcy3Kgr Microsoft Deal - https://lnkd.in/dM_JH3XG
Amazon Supports the World’s Largest Deployment of Direct Air Capture Technology to Remove Carbon From the Atmosphere
businesswire.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Embracing Transformation in the Energy Industry. The global battery industry is in the midst of a remarkable evolution, fueled by the surging demand for batteries and electric vehicles (EVs). The landscape of EVs is shifting at an astounding pace, with forecasts indicating a remarkable 18% of all car sales to be electric this year - a significant leap from 13% in 2022 and more than double the 9% in 2021. This incredible momentum signifies that nearly one in every five cars sold worldwide in 2023 could be an EV, a milestone further solidified by the impressive 10 million EVs sold last year. This seismic shift in the automotive sector is undoubtedly a positive stride towards cleaner and more sustainable transportation. However, it's also a call to action, underscoring the need to establish more resilient, transparent, and eco-friendly battery value chains. As we embrace this electrifying revolution, the importance of investing in advanced technologies becomes paramount. The Advanced Technology Fund is at the forefront, driving innovation and supporting the development of cutting-edge solutions that can shape a greener future. Let's seize this transformative moment to build a more sustainable world, where EVs and batteries power progress with a reduced carbon footprint. Together, we can forge a path toward a brighter and cleaner future for generations to come. Source: World Economic Forum #BatteryIndustry #ElectricVehicles #SustainableFuture #Innovation #AdvancedTechnologyFund
How to build more sustainable global battery value chains
weforum.org
To view or add a comment, sign in