Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004227.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004227.

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Suspected Angina Pectoris

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I and the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Suspected Angina Pectoris

Philip D Adamson et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: We determined whether high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I can improve the estimation of the pretest probability for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected stable angina.

Methods and results: In a prespecified substudy of the SCOT-HEART trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the Heart), plasma cardiac troponin was measured using a high-sensitivity single-molecule counting assay in 943 adults with suspected stable angina who had undergone coronary computed tomographic angiography. Rates of obstructive CAD were compared with the pretest probability determined by the CAD Consortium risk model with and without cardiac troponin concentrations. External validation was undertaken in an independent study population from Denmark comprising 487 patients with suspected stable angina. Higher cardiac troponin concentrations were associated with obstructive CAD with a 5-fold increase across quintiles (9%-48%; P<0.001) independent of known cardiovascular risk factors (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.46 per doubling of troponin). Cardiac troponin concentrations improved the discrimination and calibration of the CAD Consortium model for identifying obstructive CAD (C statistic, 0.788-0.800; P=0.004; χ2=16.8 [P=0.032] to 14.3 [P=0.074]). The updated model also improved classification of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association pretest probability risk categories (net reclassification improvement, 0.062; 95% confidence interval, 0.035-0.089). The revised model achieved similar improvements in discrimination and calibration when applied in the external validation cohort.

Conclusions: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration is an independent predictor of obstructive CAD in patients with suspected stable angina. Use of this test may improve the selection of patients for further investigation and treatment.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01149590.

Keywords: angina, stable; cohort studies; coronary artery disease; humans; odds ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures

Singulex provided reagent, calibrators and controls without charge and undertook the analysis of cardiac troponin I. NLM has acted as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Beckman-Coulter, Roche and Singulex. All other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cardiac troponin improves predicted risk of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with suspected angina
The red dots represent the risk of obstructive CAD as estimated by the established CAD Consortium model accounting for age, sex and symptom description. The blue dots represent the revised risk estimates with the addition of cardiac troponin quintiles. The shaded regions correspond to the risk groups and associated recommendations for further investigations as described in the ACC/AHA guidelines on the management of stable CAD. CAD, coronary artery disease; ACC, American College of Cardiology; AHA, American Heart Association; hs-cTnI, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I; ECG, electrocardiography; y, years.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Model calibration within the external validation cohort
Plot demonstrates poor calibration of predicted probability vs observed proportion of obstructive coronary artery disease using the established CADC model (blue). Good model calibration is demonstrated within the validation cohort following the addition of troponin to the CADC model (red). The dashed line represents perfect calibration. CADC, Coronary Artery Disease Consortium; HL, Hosmer-Lemeshow.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sekhri N, Feder GS, Junghans C, Hemingway H, Timmis AD. How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients. Heart. 2007;93:458–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Euro Heart Survey Investigators. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. European heart journal. 2005;26:996–1010. - PubMed
    1. European Society of Cardiology Task Force. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. European heart journal. 2013;34:2949–3003. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 95. NICE; London: 2010. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin.
    1. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, Berra K, Blankenship JC, Dallas AP, Douglas PS, Foody JM, Gerber TC, Hinderliter AL, King SB, 3rd, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary. Circulation. 2012;126:3097–137. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data