An icon of a desk calendar. An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. An icon of a paper envelope. An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. An icon of the Google "G" mark. An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. An icon representing logout. An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. An icon of a tick mark. An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. A opening quote mark. A closing quote mark. An icon of an arrow. An icon of a paper folder. An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. An icon of a digital camera. An icon of a caret arrow. An icon of a clock face. An icon of the an X shape. An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component An icon of a speech bubble. An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. An icon of 3 horizontal dots. An icon of a paper envelope. An icon of a facebook f logo. An icon of a digital camera. An icon of a house. An icon of the Instagram logo. An icon of the LinkedIn logo. An icon of a magnifying glass. A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. An icon of 3 horizontal lines. An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. An explanation mark centred inside a circle. An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. An icon of a star. An icon of a tag. An icon of the Twitter logo. An icon of a video camera shape. A icon displaying a speech bubble An icon of the WhatsApp logo. An icon of an information logo. A mathematical 'plus' symbol. An icon indicating Time. An icon of a green tick. An icon of a greyed out success tick. An icon of a loading spinner. An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. An icon of a facebook f logo. An icon of the Twitter app logo. An icon of the LinkedIn logo. An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. An icon of an mail envelope. A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Incredibly valuable’ report not received by Police Scotland, Bayoh inquiry told

Former deputy chief constable Fiona Taylor has been giving evidence to the inquiry into Sheku Bayoh's death in Kirkcaldy.

Former DCC Fiona Taylor
Former deputy chief constable Fiona Taylor has been giving evidence at the inquiry.

Police Scotland did not receive a police watchdog investigation report that would have been “incredibly valuable” in terms of examining officers’ conduct, the Sheku Bayoh inquiry has heard.

Retired deputy chief constable Fiona Taylor, who served in her role from 2018 to 2023, spoke about the Police Investigations and Review Commissioner (Pirc) report when she gave evidence to the inquiry on Wednesday.

Mr Bayoh, 31, a father-of-two, died after he was restrained on the ground by six police officers in Kirkcaldy on May 3 2015.

The inquiry is examining the circumstances leading to Mr Bayoh’s death, how police dealt with the aftermath, the investigation into his death, and whether race was a factor.

Sheku Bayoh
Sheku Bayoh died in 2015.

In October 2018, then lord advocate James Wolffe decided not to prosecute any officers who were involved in the incident after Pirc submitted an investigation report.

However, the inquiry heard on Wednesday Police Scotland were never shown any of Pirc’s findings in the months following the decision.

Angela Grahame KC, senior counsel to the inquiry, told Ms Taylor: “We’ve certainly heard that the Pirc report was not sent to Police Scotland, by Pirc or by the Crown.”

Ms Taylor said Police Scotland “didn’t have that Pirc investigation to the best of [her] knowledge”.

Former DCC Fiona Taylor
Fiona Taylor giving evidence to the inquiry.

Ms Grahame then asked her if she would have considered the Pirc report to be necessary before police could carry out its own assessment into its regulations.

She replied: “In terms of that assessment being as complete as it could possibly be, it would have been helpful to have that material, certainly.”

Ms Grahame then asked if, after the Crown Office made the decision not to prosecute officers, were there any “active lines of investigation” adopted by Police Scotland to seek further information from officers who were present during the incident following which Mr Bayoh died.

Ms Taylor said no, and that she does not “recall there being consideration” to the possibility of interviewing the officers a number of years after the incident took place.

She said she “cannot remember in all good conscience” whether there was consideration given to doing so, but added: “Certainly that activity was not undertaken.”

Angela Grahame KC
Angela Grahame KC quizzed Ms Taylor.

Inquiry chairman Lord Bracadale then interjected, asking: “It’s clear that at that point having the Pirc report which has been, as you put it, helpful at least.

“Did you explore at all with the Crown or the Pirc whether you could get the Pirc report?”

Ms Taylor replied: “You’re right, it would have been incredibly valuable.

“We may well have had that conversation but I suspect we would have pended that conversation until we understood whether the family wanted to exercise their right to review.”

Lord Bracadale then asked: “Looking to the future, would it assist those responsible for misconduct reports in the police to have the Pirc report at a point where proceedings were not being taken?”

Ms Taylor said: “Yes sir, I think it would.

“This is a set of circumstances that we can experience on occasion with Pirc, that they have carried out an investigation.

“They still have the report, and because the investigation is being carried out by Pirc investigators, Police Scotland doesn’t have that statement or indeed all the facts in front of them, so yes I think that would be incredibly valuable.”

Lord Bracadale
Lord Bracadale.

During the afternoon session, Ms Grahame asked Ms Taylor what steps Police Scotland have taken since Mr Bayoh’s death to ensure it is an anti-racist organisation.

Ms Taylor said there is “work to be done for us organisationally to become a truly anti-racist organisation”.

She added: “To understand what that means, and to integrate our determination to become an anti-racist organisation into every element of policing activity.

“Now, I don’t think that was the case in 2015, I wasn’t here, but certainly the work that I have done, the work that I did in my tenure in Police Scotland, very much focused on how do we become a different organisation, a better organisation, an organisation which actually understands what it means to be anti-racist and what that then means in terms of discharge of those powers and responsibilities that are bested within police officers.

“Also what that means in term of the culture within the organisation, to ensure that it nurtures, supports, values and progresses every single individual, police officer or police staff within the organisation.”

The inquiry, taking place in Edinburgh, continues.