Wikidata:Edit groups/OR/6ca12d684e3

@Richirikken:

• Q107166380 is a duplicate of long existing Q59533615 found via Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human HumanAFuser (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I merged the Leopold Vorreiter Item now, hope that was fine --Richirikken (talk) 09:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• "Johannes Carl Reinhold" (Q107174774) - 08:27, 10 June 2021‎ Richirikken talk contribs‎ 3,779 bytes +3,779‎ ‎Created a new Item: Batch of new Persons (mainly German scientists aktive in the years 1933 - 1945) which are not yet in Wikidata and have a GND and ... but your creation edit doesn't contain any GND HumanAFuser (talk) 08:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Sorry, the second batch of person I added have no GND to my knowledge --Richirikken (talk) 09:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• will you add VIAF and ISNI?
  • viaf https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q107166595&diff=1438686370&oldid=1438218308 HumanAFuser (talk) 08:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • viaf+isni https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q107166585&type=revision&diff=1438885448&oldid=1438843637 HumanAFuser (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• more duplicates found via Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human:
  1. Q107164143 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q94944921&diff=1438739665&oldid=1337220208 HumanAFuser (talk) 10:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Q107165266 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q94828486&diff=1438749287&oldid=1402710751 HumanAFuser (talk) 11:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Q107163159 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q56304857&diff=1438759644&oldid=1428235155 HumanAFuser (talk) 11:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Q107164740 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q82718795&diff=1438761047&oldid=1426787249 HumanAFuser (talk) 11:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Q107166568 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q95305328&diff=1438881410&oldid=1309407841 HumanAFuser (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Q107165852 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q94888524&diff=1438886333&oldid=1271894055 HumanAFuser (talk) 14:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Q107163349 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q11771849&diff=1438893287&oldid=1438891771 HumanAFuser (talk) 15:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Q107163891 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q94761213&diff=1438896469&oldid=1370404951 HumanAFuser (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Q107164028 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q65007217&diff=1438898074&oldid=1430633070 HumanAFuser (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Q107165148 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q95008749&diff=1438899873&oldid=1402691500 HumanAFuser (talk) 15:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Q107164904 = Q95007552
  12. Q107165279 = Q9263865
  13. Q107166220 = Q95271633
  14. Q107165493 = Q94913524
  15. Q107166378 = Q78165042
  16. Q107164158 = Q67214687
  17. Q107164465 = Q94759378
  18. Q107166156 = Q91947414
  19. Q107164341 = Q65174527
  20. Q107166591 = Q94779935
  21. Q107165036 = Q95008996
  22. Q107166323 = Q94904292
  23. Q107163266 = Q82293426
  24. Q107164983 = Q95007570
  25. Q107164617 = Q94788768
  26. Q107165480 = Q83490514
  27. Q107163644 = Q95340379
  28. Q107164016 = Q94761573 - each starting with Q107 remaining in Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human solved, 18 as listed from GEPRIS merged, two other from other source. HumanAFuser (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• duplicates without GND ID in the later object, found via your contributions list
  • Q107176050 https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q57893&diff=prev&oldid=1438750858 HumanAFuser (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the cleaning --Richirikken (talk) 11:52, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The contribution was part of a data donation I managed with @Elya:. You can find more information here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:GEPRIS_Historisch_(DFG) --Richirikken (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Elya, Richirikken: - why for a given GND ID, a new item was created, even if an existing item in WD already contained the GND ID? HumanAFuser (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HumanAFuser: this was a huge upload which I did to my best knowledge. Altogether 3.255 new persons have been genarted from which 1.827 had a GND. All persons without have been professionally checked, if they have a GND or if they are already in Wikidata. The one case you found Q107176050 had a mssing GND in our data which is a mistake. I think this resulted from difficulties discerning proposals to the "Notgemeinschaft der Deutschen Wissenschaft" and the "Reichsforschungsrat" between this two person: https://gepris-historisch.dfg.de/person/5140444? https://gepris-historisch.dfg.de/person/5140442? The other duplicates where just a handful from more than 3.200 new persons. If you still find some duplicates, please let me know, I'll help to clean it up. best regrads --Richirikken (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't answer the question. GND 117494038 is in WD since 2020-05-19 22:13 (Q94841812) [1], merged 2020-07-20 18:47 into Q59533615 [2], still 2021-06-09 Q107166380 containing GND=117494038 was created as a new item. I would assume that one checks for existence of a given GND ID before creating a new item with that GND ID. But maybe it were really only few cases. Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human lists 378 more to check, but I don't if it contains any more GEPRIS humans. Overall: Great work, thanks a lot! HumanAFuser (talk) 13:39, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As explained, I checked all cases for existing GND in Wikidata prior to upload. However the GND was missing on our side for the case (Q107176050), thus I was unable to detect this duplicate. You are welcome to add information to the new cases, which will find a way back in our database. Best regards --Richirikken (talk) 13:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, not as explained. You created items with GND ID, where the GND ID was already in WD. HumanAFuser (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right, for the upper cases. I'm not sure why I did't find these cases with open refine and hope this are just a few cases. I did a prior reconcilitation with the GND in open refine though and excluded more than 40 cases from upload. Do you have a special script to check for such cases in my upload, besides this page Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human? --Richirikken (talk) 15:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no special tool. But it seems not many with GND are left for checking. I don't know how OpenRefine works, I would have checked it with SPARQL via the WD query API and maybe a local script or database. HumanAFuser (talk) 15:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HumanAFuser:, thank you for your help. Have you checked all cases with a double GND, or are there still open cases? --Richirikken (talk) 20:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See above "each starting with Q107 remaining in Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human solved, 18 as listed from GEPRIS merged, two other from other source. HumanAFuser (talk) 16:51, 10 June 2021 (UTC)" - but I have no special GEPRIS query. I am working on cleaning Property_talk:P227/Duplicates#human . HumanAFuser (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]