Back
Dajasj
•
Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts/archive1
•
en.wikipedia.org
Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts/archive1 (Log · Page History) |
| User | Dajasj (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 5 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 4.4 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 2,870 |
| Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
5 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
5 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
5 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 20:45 | Diff · History | 486 | →List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts: Reply |
| 2024-07-01 12:41 | Diff · History | 169 | →List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts: Reply |
| 2024-06-30 09:19 | Diff · History | 524 | →List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts: Reply |
| 2024-06-26 20:10 | Diff · History | 345 | →List of Dutch (in)formateurs and scouts: Reply |
| 2024-06-16 18:22 | Diff · History | 1,346 | ←Created page with '{{subst:PR/subst}} {{Peer review page|topic=socsci}} I've listed this article for peer review because I want to turn it into a Featured List in the future. I have a few specific questions: * Is the introduction good enough for anyone not familiar with the topic? * Does the default sorting method make sense, or should I do ascending on date? (I prefered the most recent at the top, as I can imagine more readers would look up the more recent ones) * Should I i...' |
All times are in UTC.