Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | SAT (Log · Page History) |
| User | Transmissionelement (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 34 |
| Minor edits | 2 (5.9%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 25 (73.5%) |
| Reverted edits | 1 (2.9%) |
| atbe1 | 113.1 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 4,483 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -24,185 |
Minor edits
·
2 (5.9%)
Major edits
·
32 (94.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
25 (73.5%)
Manual edits
·
9 (26.5%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (2.9%)
Unreverted edits
·
33 (97.1%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 23:36 | Diff · History | 736 | (reverted) Undid revision 936937335 by Petergstrom (talk) Uncertain why this info was removed, it seemed well-sourced and relevant |
| 2018-02-07 00:35 | Diff · History | -386 | Reverted to revision 821058063 by TDJankins (talk): Eliminating odd duplicate link add that was then changed to something irrel. (TW) |
| 2014-04-22 20:38 | Diff · History | 434 | Reverted 1 edit by 122.173.215.179 (talk): Rvrting incorrect edits. (TW) |
| 2013-11-06 19:18 | Diff · History | -850 | →Reuse of old SAT exams: Rmving what is essentially extensive quoting from the cited article |
| 2013-04-22 02:45 | Diff · History | 11 | Reverted 1 edit by 65.191.80.114 (talk): Rvrtd frivolous edit. (TW) |
| 2013-01-03 05:25 | Diff · History | 0 | Reverted 1 edit by 84.74.51.194 (talk): Rvrtd frivolous edit. (TW) |
| 2012-05-11 21:20 | Diff · History | 1 | Reverted 1 edit by 86.20.184.194 (talk): Rmvd unhelpful edit. (TW) |
| 2012-01-13 15:55 | Diff · History | 0 | Reverted 1 edit by 71.113.252.244 (talk): Rvrtd bad edit. (TW) |
| 2012-01-06 15:51 | Diff · History | 41 | →Mathematics: small edits |
| 2011-09-03 16:17 | Diff · History | 1 | Reverted 1 edit by 82.73.11.5 (talk): Rvrtd non-grammatically correct edit. (TW) |
| 2011-01-10 16:24 | Diff · History | -80 | →Test preparation: The parenthetical comment was going to become a list of every company; you either name them all or none, and there's a link to the test preparation page in the sentence already. |
| 2010-09-20 15:21 | Diff · History | -4 | Reverted 1 edit by 41.199.41.193; Rmvd nonsensical edit. (TW) |
| 2010-08-09 23:44 | Diff · History | -21 | Reverted 1 edit by Fsenior; Rmvd non-notable commercial company. (TW) |
| 2010-06-05 16:25 | Diff · History | -53 | Reverted 1 edit by 92.124.0.77; Rmvd per WP:EL. (TW) |
| 2010-05-18 16:00 | Diff · History | 0 | →Critical Reading: sentence edit for clarity and grammatical soundness |
| 2010-05-17 13:33 | Diff · History | -106 | Reverted 1 edit by E235; Rmvd per WP:EL. (TW) |
| 2010-05-07 14:53 | Diff · History | -10 | Reverted 1 edit by 76.167.154.175; Rmvd non-notable company. (TW) |
| 2010-05-05 13:33 | Diff · History | 4 | Reverted 1 edit by 86.96.229.93; Rvrted to prior version. (TW) |
| 2010-04-21 15:58 | Diff · History | -72 | Reverted 1 edit by 151.188.105.130; Rmvd irrelevant, non-sourced statements. (TW) |
| 2010-03-18 14:09 | Diff · History | -13 | Reverted 1 edit by 61.17.119.106. (TW) |
| 2010-03-03 16:14 | Diff · History | -15 | Reverted 1 edit by 122.175.76.87; Eliminated redundant comment. (TW) |
| 2010-02-16 16:59 | Diff · History | -276 | →IQ 200 geniuses who scored extremely high on SAT: Section was not supported by reliable sources and appears irrelevant to the article. And, if they have 200 IQs, they should score high. |
| 2010-02-16 16:56 | Diff · History | -28 | Reverted 1 edit by 75.20.177.91; Rmving non-essential inclusion. the referenc eis not rtying to provide a comprehensive list of all options. . (TW) |
| 2010-02-15 19:53 | Diff · History | 226 | Undid revision 344259990 by 98.100.163.238 (talk) Rvrted incomplete edit |
| 2010-01-11 02:25 | Diff · History | 898 | Reverted 1 edit by 67.81.242.18; Previous version was fine; new edit was nonsensical. (TW) |
| 2009-12-24 15:03 | Diff · History | -17 | →2008 changes: Edited for clarity; its better but probably needs a further edit |
| 2009-12-22 18:51 | Diff · History | 2,817 | Reverted 1 edit by 74.197.228.170; Content was valid. (TW) |
| 2009-11-11 21:55 | Diff · History | 50 | Reverted 1 edit by 168.229.20.14; I see no need to remove these reference requests as they are needed. Otherwise they are unsourced claims.. (TW) |
| 2009-11-06 15:15 | Diff · History | -14 | Reverted 1 edit by 96.48.128.224 identified as vandalism to last revision by Fvasconcellos. (TW) |
| 2009-10-06 16:28 | Diff · History | -225 | →Test preparation: Removed list of specific prep companies after opening topic for debate on Talk page. See Talk page for basis. |
| 2009-10-01 21:33 | Diff · History | -135 | Undid revision 317340655 by Astercom (talk) (Rmvd link to SAT prep book; the other Further Reading items are social or psychometr) |
| 2009-09-30 15:24 | Diff · History | -21,793 | Undid revision 317100918 by Valuedcustomerman (talk) Vandalism |
| 2009-09-01 12:52 | Diff · History | -86 | Rmvd link to SAT prep book; the other Further Reading items are social or psychometric analyses of the SAT, not straight test prep books |
| 2009-07-12 15:01 | Diff · History | -1 | extra period removed |
All times are in UTC.