Top edits to an article
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Article | User talk:Maunus (Log · Page History) |
| User | WeijiBaikeBianji (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 22 |
| Minor edits | 1 (4.5%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 91.6 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 26,808 |
| Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
1 (4.5%)
Major edits
·
21 (95.5%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
22 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
22 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-02-07 20:42 | Diff · History | 449 | →Race and intelligence: r (I'm not Maunus, but I came by here while following another talk page thread) |
| 2015-04-14 17:45 | Diff · History | 1,469 | →Congratulations on earning the Million Award by improving the English language article: new section |
| 2015-03-26 17:59 | Diff · History | 446 | →It's okay to use the current edition, really. : new section |
| 2015-02-23 02:24 | Diff · History | 218 | →Statement on SAT page needs a cite: Did you check the article edit history? |
| 2014-12-24 18:36 | Diff · History | 852 | →thanks?: There will surely be differences of opinion on some of these issues, but we all have the opportunity to learn facts from another and to adjust our opinions calmly and civilly. |
| 2014-10-27 23:48 | Diff · History | 959 | →That's a really interesting DYK nomination: new section |
| 2014-10-26 17:55 | Diff · History | 2,823 | →Is your claim that further reading references are somehow disfavored on Wikipedia? Where does policy say that?: |
| 2014-10-26 16:53 | Diff · History | 2,063 | →Is your claim that further reading references are somehow disfavored on Wikipedia? Where does policy say that?: new section |
| 2014-10-14 15:57 | Diff · History | 1,529 | →I was glad to see you reminding other editors about Wikipedia core policies: new section |
| 2014-10-01 21:17 | Diff · History | 572 | The policy applies differently to living persons from how it applies to persons long dead. See WP:BLP for details. Meanwhile, finding sources would be a good idea. |
| 2014-10-01 20:51 | Diff · History | 2,282 | →Feel free to check for sources; let's be very careful about BLP issues per Wikipedia policy: new section |
| 2014-09-27 01:52 | Diff · History | 1,531 | →POV sources are not Wikipedia reliable sources except for limited uses: new section |
| 2014-09-02 17:09 | Diff · History | 19 | →Political Correctness: added reflist-talk template to place reference in correct thread (no change of text) |
| 2014-07-01 23:35 | Diff · History | 940 | →Level 4 vital articles list of 10,000 articles: new section |
| 2014-02-05 18:46 | Diff · History | 315 | →Intelligence citation: r to I.P. |
| 2014-01-15 16:28 | Diff · History | 839 | →These sources for Race, IQ, Genetics: In general, blogs are not reliable sources, and Wikipedia is the better for editors finding sources in places other than blogs. |
| 2013-09-05 19:42 | Diff · History | 357 | →Nyborg and Biographies of Living Persons: I'll check carefully for sources for this WP:BLP article. |
| 2013-07-24 22:23 | Diff · History | 1,152 | →Thanks for your helpful edits in several controversial articles: new section |
| 2011-02-01 01:37 | Diff · History | 420 | →Letter to The Economist January 29th–February 4th 2011: new section |
| 2010-11-28 03:51 | Diff · History | 1,796 | →Question about using sources to edit an encyclopedia: Thanks for the specific suggestion, but I would like to double-check this |
| 2010-11-27 03:18 | Diff · History | 5,374 | →Question about using sources to edit an encyclopedia: new section |
| 2010-08-02 02:10 | Diff · History | 403 | →Thanks for your participation on the race and intelligence articles.: new section |
All times are in UTC.