Jump to content

User talk:Black Kite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia






New message from Red-tailed hawk

[edit]
Hello, Black Kite. You have new messages at Wikipedia:AE.
Message added 05:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:24, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AE

[edit]

I posted about that to Red-tailed hawk earlier but I'm not sure when they will be back online. I don't think a TB will be sufficient, but maybe. Some sanction is needed. Doug Weller talk 10:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User

[edit]

User @Josephruela: could be user @Fa30sp:. See history page of 2025 FIFA Club World Cup. Island92 (talk) 14:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Newv edit war occurred. Previously, user Fa30sp was prevented from editing this page for the same reason. Island92 (talk) 15:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked. Black Kite (talk) 19:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not an apology, but more like a "you were right, I was wrong"

[edit]

Should have known better, I guess. On those rare occasions when I disagree with you, I think, well Black Kite can't be perfect all the time. That ... is apparently not what happened here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s talk

[edit]

Let’s talk about why you took away my phrase that is accurate that says Uruguay won a hat-trick of world titles. What is the point of taking that away? It’s true. This is shown via a photo in the fifa museum in Zurich, Switzerland. That “twitter post” still exists on X but you saw the photo. You know the FIFA museum says this, and yet you still want to take away credit from Uruguay as winning a hat-trick of world titles. Why? Please re-instate it back on their page. You don’t even need a reference to put that true sentence.Truefacts24 (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Summer Olympics Football

[edit]

You deleted my summer Olympics work and said “ That's an interesting take on it, but it's going to need a discussion at the talk page before such wide-ranging changes”

Why does my correct history need to be discussed but the version of it before which I fixed which is incorrect information with less official sources doesn’t need discussion to be there? Please explain. Truefacts24 (talk) 13:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]