Jump to content

User talk:Toddst1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia




Administrators' newsletter – September 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


November Articles for creation backlog drive[edit]

Hello Toddst1:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous


ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious[edit]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – February 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous


Reliable sources[edit]

What's the current thinking on onthisday.com ? It seems obvious to me that it's a mirror site, but it's been allowed as an external link on many pages. Deb (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just replied to your query on RSN. Yeah, totally a mirror site. Yes, its use is rampant. It's amazing how many folks will argue that onthisday or similar pages published by AP are reliable sources. It's just another sign of the decline of this project. Toddst1 (talk) 05:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the main sign of "decline of this project" are over the top strict admins, who do not allow any futher improvements of it by undo and accusations of other users in edit war, instead of helping and finding compromises.
@Toddst1 Do you happen to know anyone like that by a chance? Gigman (talk) 13:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't compromise on the reliability of sources. You just proved my point. BTW, I'm not an admin. Go away now. Toddst1 (talk) 23:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just happened to randomly stumble upon this page. I have no idea who any of you in this conversation are, nor what any relevant background may be, but I just wanted to say that saying something like "Go away now" is so extremely beyond the level of civility that should be expected by any serious wikipedia editor. Perhaps you meant it with a sense of humor, as tone can be hard to read and often gets lost in writing, especially on the internet, but unless I'm drastically misinterpreting something, may I please ask that you rethink how you speak to others? How would you feel if spoken to that way? Please read Wikipedia:Civility. Vontheri (talk) 06:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What in the world?[edit]

Hello, previously I've noticed you reverting my edits and threatning me with blocking... However, you did not provided any further suggestions or actions. You see, I've tried to avoid citating onthisday.com, but after seeing numerous usage of it on other articles, including DOYs, I've started to use it too, and weren't reverted by anyone untill a few days ago. I want a clarification, why onthisday.com is considered as unreliable source, meanwhile it's not in the list of such, and why is there so much of citation of it? Also, regarding that same 4th of February page, why Niagara falls ice bridge disaster isn't allowed to be in the list, while it is mentioned on Niagara Falls page? Once again, I saw so much similiar cases, (when some event is too small to have it's own article, but still meantioned in other)

But my real question is, if there are rules about that not being allowed, why there are so much violations of it in, and nobody's fixing? And why only recent edits get reverted without previous (I literally reffered to onthisday.com on the same page more than twice, but you haven't removed those edits)

Anyway, while I'm awaiting for you response, I want to say, that from now on, thanks to you and other of "your type", since I only get revertions and warnings for trying to do something, I will never ever make any further contributions on Wikipedia, except undo the ones I see breaking the rules. Just like @Kiwipete does, if that's the way you guys do things around here. But unlike you, I will undo all incorrect edits, not only the recent ones, and we will see what the articles will become. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glebushko0703 (talkcontribs) 14:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOFIXIT. Toddst1 (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous


Re: Source is not reliable[edit]

Hi @Toddst1, I wanted to follow up on your message on my talk page. As I, now, understand it, my Instagram Reel source to the claim that Tessa Violet was born on March 20,1990 violated the no original research doctrine, due to infering the year via the date of publication minus the age stated in the video. After doing some more research the topic, I have discovered that on Tessa Violet's genius profile, which has been verified as her, states that she was born on March 20,1990. Would this count as a reliable source on this matter or do I need to continue to research for a more reliable source?

-@Madalyn the Rose Madalyn the Rose (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reliable enough to me. See WP:DOB. Toddst1 (talk) 18:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Madalyn the Rose:When I looked at it, I thought it was a social media page. Apparently it's somewhere between that and WP:USERG which is not ok. Toddst1 (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024[edit]

Hello Toddst1,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive[edit]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Graham Beards
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Nomination of Woody Outlaw for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woody Outlaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody Outlaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walsh90210 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2024[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Technical news

Miscellaneous


The latest[edit]

Check this out! Deb (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Editor doesn't want to hear anything [1]. Toddst1 (talk) 23:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly do not want to hear anything from editors who pretend that me pasting info in a (largely unreferenced) list from an article where I already referenced that exact info (and every single other fact), as much as they may dislike it, is not at all the same as "adding unreferenced info". Especially if they go on suggesting that I should be intimidated off wikipedia or blocked for not serving their commands. I hope this clarifies it. Feel free to erase this comment, as I did with your comment, but hear this: never bother me on my talk page again. Dahn (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ANI is <- that way.[2] Toddst1 (talk) 23:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And you thought you had a block log! Deb (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deb, I'm not sure what full scope of the malfunction is there, but WP:SOMTP captures some of it. Toddst1 (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Too right. WP:POINT also applies, except he thinks that adding a cn template is going to annoy us. (LOL) Deb (talk) 07:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Carol Leonning wiki page needs updating, can you help?[edit]

Carol Leonning bio needs updating, very old info often used and incorrect -- for example she has won four Pulitzer Prize Awards -- see her Washington Post Bio for more accurate information: https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/carol-d-leonnig/ I am not able to update myself because I am her sister-in-law and have a conflict and I am not very skilled at wiki editing, but want to help because it the information on it is so incorrect. She is often called upon to do TV and radio interviews and they use this information and make incorrect introductions of her. Also, the photo on this site is so old; it would be better to use the official photojournalist photo from her Washington Post (online). Thank you if you are able to help make this site more accurate. MHKelley (talk) 16:34, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MHKelley: you have a very talented and accomplished sister-in-law. And thanks for declaring your relationship and being aware of our WP:COI policies. BTW,she has only 2 "n"s in her last name: Carol Leonnig.
I'm not seeing anywhere that the Post's photo of Carol is in the public domain, so we can't use it. However, if you have a photo you took that you'd like to make available for use, we could use that.
While I was a primary contributor to her bio, that was done during a time when I had much more time available for wiki editing. I'm far, far less active these days. However, if I find myself with some time to dig in to it, I'll see what I can do.
I see you've left a note on the article's talkpage which is a great start. If you wanted to suggest any specific edits on that page, that would be a great idea. Toddst1 (talk) 19:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I have followed up with Carol to ask about a photo that she has permission to share or if the Washington Post photo is in the public domain. (Funny that I got her last name wrong, she has been my sister-in-law for more than 20 years and named one of her daughters after me so I should get it right!) I will try to leave specific edit ideas on the article's talkpage. I wasn't sure if that was appropriate but since you suggested it then it must be OK -- so I will take time to do that. Thank you so much for your help, I sincerely appreciate it. I hope to learn more and become better at Wiki editing. I used to be a journalist myself. I worked mostly in television news so I'm not the strongest when it comes to print writing/editing. I very much appreciate Wikipedia and its commitment to accuracy. Thank you for your contributions. MHKelley (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MHKelley: That's great and leaving polite suggestions with a disclaimer that you are related is the way to handle stuff like this. A lot of folks try to use wikipedia as a vehicle to puff their image or spin perception, so a lot of editors can be sensitive, but as long as the material you suggest follows WP:NPOV we should be fine. Feel free to email me directly by clicking the link in the column to the left if you want specific help or if folks aren't receptive on the talk page. I'll see what I can do. Cheers! Toddst1 (talk) 18:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]