Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melee (game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 00:15, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Melee (game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. The only available sources seem to be books by the game's creator and trivial mentions at a few game-related blogs. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 22:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I have added one really good source, so I suspect there is more out there. BOZ (talk) 17:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will also note that User:Brainy J added a couple of ref ideas to the article's talk page a couple months ago. I don't have access to either, but I would say this makes the topic WP:GNG-worthy. BOZ (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak keep More sources would be great, but we've at least one very good one and this game has been fairly important in the history of RPGs (he says of personal knowledge). Will change to keep if anyone can find an additional solid source (I can't find anything on the talk page?). I can't find anything on-line that's a RS, but that's not shocking given the age of the game. Hobit (talk) 15:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Hobit, see the box that says "The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:". BOZ (talk) 00:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010(talk) 13:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.