Commons:Deletion requests/AI-generated adolescent girls

Out of COM:SCOPE images--Trade (talk) 02:52, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 9.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 8.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 7.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 6.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 5.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 4.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 3.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 2.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the old cabin - 1.jpg

• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 5.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 4.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 3.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 2.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - In the village - 1.jpg

• File:Stable Diffusion - In the village - 7.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - At the village - 6.jpg

• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 10.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion -In the desert - 9.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 8.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 7.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 6.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 5.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion - In the desert - 4.jpg

• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 5.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 4.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 3.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 2.jpg
• File:Stable Diffusion (unfiltered) - At the guesthouse - 1.jpg

I am not not sure why eroticism should be out of scope. These images illustrate what can be done by Stable Diffusion on the subject. I tried not to be repetitive and vary the models' features, activities, settings, postures, clothing, lighting, etc. This deletion request looks very much like censorship of erotic images. I do not just dump loads of AI-generated crap without thinking, I take the time to curate and categorize them. There is so much erotic junk on commons, wouldn't having some better quality erotic images be useful? They illustrate the abilities of Stable Diffusion so much better than what we had before?

You will notice that I try to avoid the absurdly buxom models that are so prevalent and keep them realistic, as if these situations could have happened in real life. Maybe that is what annoys you?

To sum it up:

• In scope nude underage girl
  In scope nude underage girl
• In scope nude woman on a plane
  In scope nude woman on a plane
• In scope realistic depiction of Joan of Arc
  In scope realistic depiction of Joan of Arc

• Out of scope
  Out of scope
• Out of scope
  Out of scope
• Out of scope
  Out of scope

Tullius Detritus (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, nudity (or even pornography) is allowed on commons, as long as it's legal and different to what we already have. If these can be used to illustrate a certain technology, they're certainly also in scope (the images appear to be unused, though). There is, however, a debate among law scholars whether AI-generated child pornography is legal or not. IIRC the majority means no (see e.g https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/92436/is-ai-child-virtual-porn-illegal-in-the-us). So some of these images could be borderline legal due to that. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That and i did not wanted another by David S. Soriano case due to the volume he was uploading the files Trade (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree the underage thing is an issue. AI results are rather inconsistent and with the same prompt you may either get mature women, young women, adolescent girls or actual children, that's very weird.

I indeed uploaded some files where the model had very juvenile faces, but they are just a few and I categorized them into

Category:Nude adolescent girls in art so that they can be found easily. And to be consistent on this topic, nude anime female characters in Category:Nude or partially nude women in anime and manga should also be reviewed for 'underageness'...

I am also aware that Commons is not my personal space and did intend to provide illustrative images, yes I uploaded many at once, but that's mostly done, my erotic streak is over and maybe even AI image generation altogether as I find it rather frustratingly random in its present state.

Maybe I might have been more selective in my curation, but it's a bit difficult to choose...

Also please just look at uploads like Designermadsen's. Are all his works really so educative and not somewhat self-indulgent? Again this deletion request looks like censorship of erotic content.

Actually maybe we could define a quota? Each Commons user would we allowed say 100 hundred AI-generated (more or less educative) files (too many? 50?), beyond that, there should be deletions?

I fear I am already beyond 100 and some pruning might be needed :/

I think I will reply to each file deletion request above individually as these 'Out of Scope' mass deletions are abusively too convenient: you tag files you dislike as 'out of scope' and voilà, good riddance! Tullius Detritus (talk) 10:26, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Omphalographer and Jmabel: --Trade (talk) 00:47, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]