Commons:Deletion requests/AI porn images

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI porn images

[edit]

Out of scope. I cannot think of any reason why we would need AI-generated pornography, especially so much of it. --Di (they-them) (talk) 19:21, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. These images are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. A limited number of AI-generated images could be useful as illustrations of AI image generation itself, but the borderline pornographic nature of most of these images is an unnecessary distraction from that goal. In any event, illustrating AI image generation would require more details about how exactly the images were generated (e.g. what specific model, prompt, and parameters were used), and these images lack any of that information. Omphalographer (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, for reasons stated by others above. - Jmabel ! talk 23:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per COM:PORN. Their quality is neither good for educational purpose, and I think non-pornographic AI-generated images can do the illustration work as well.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:16, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete WTF? Nothing of value here. Gamowebbed (talk) 13:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Delete all this filth without exceptions! How could one even hesitate, this should be a speedy deletion, no need to bother the community with that, the difference is so obvious:

-- Tullius Detritus (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tullius Detritus: Just because other stuff exists on Commons doesn't mean that your porn is necessary. In fact, if you think that the other images are out of scope, you are free to nominate them for deletion as well. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:06, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WTF? as stated above, you can nominate those for deletion too Gamowebbed (talk) 17:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regular looking real nude women = bad, imaginary nude women who look like pornstars = good? Dronebogus (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete not because AI porn is out of scope, but because we have enough to represent the bare (geddit) concept and any new uploads should represent notable topics. These are spam uploads of personal art, so they’re out of scope. Dronebogus (talk) 22:58, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:39, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]